When I Was An Ex-Gay I Voted To Ban Gay Marriage

Today The State Supreme Court Ruled To Overturn My Vote

Daniel Gonzales

May 15th, 2008

Yes, in 2000 I voted yes on California Ballot Proposition 22 which defined marriage as the union of one man and one woman. At the time I had recently concluded reparative therapy with Joseph Nicolosi and held beliefs about sexuality largely consistent with Evangelical Christianity. I believed marriage was created by the Christian God and that our society had no choice but to retain God’s definition and voted accordingly.

In reaction to today’s decision the religious-right will no doubt claim this decision is counter to the will of the people. However this assumes nothing has changed in 8 years.

Eight years later I now realize how flawed, hurtful, and destructive my logic was. I wish to apologize for that vote. There are very few things in my ex-gay experience I am truly ashamed of — My vote in 2000 is one of those things. I thank the California State Supreme Court for making right on my error.

I have never been prouder than I am today to be from California.

Larry

May 15th, 2008

I had already planned to return permenantly to California later this year – even before this ruling came down. I moved away in 1999 for a job, and while I recognize the importance of having made that move, I am ready to go back. There’s no place like the Golden State. California or bust!

GDad

May 15th, 2008

Go, California!

Thanks for keeping us up to date.

Jarred

May 15th, 2008

In reaction to today’s decision the religious-right will no doubt claim this decision is counter to the will of the people.

I agree that this is what they will likely done (and it appears that Matt Barber already has). But I’ve always found it strange that people who normally preach that (1) people’s “willfulness” is what usually get them in trouble and (2) the majority are often in the wrong (“wide is the gate and broad is the path that leads to destruction”?) would suddenly be advocating for “the will of the people.” Such advocacy just isn’t consistent with the rest of their theology.

Cooner

May 15th, 2008

We’ll forgive you this time, Daniel. :) Seriously, a very heartfelt writing and very encouraging to see how hearts and minds change over time.

My partner and I had to leave California a few months ago for job/economic reasons. I hope we can move back someday.

Cal90049

May 15th, 2008

I was a field coordinator in the LA office for the No on Knight (Prop. 22) in 2000. I cannot tell you the disillusionment and shock that many of my coworkers and friends had about California when 22 passed. Most of us were transplants and considered California a mythical place. It was a rude awakening.

I left 4 years ago for a job and still not a day goes by I don’t miss “home”.

I miss it even more today.

Jason D

May 15th, 2008

it’s amazing to me how often the anti-gay side seems to not understand the government of their own country.

Supreme Courts NEVER interpret the law! Lower courts decide if a law has been violated or not, the Supremes decide if the law violates the constitution, and if it’s justifiable or not. That’s why they’re not elected, so that they care about the constitution, not “the will of the people”.

Our forefathers recognized that democracy, by itself, is little more than mob rule. They recognized that majority can be swayed, and that just because a bunch of people agree on something, doesn’t mean it’s right or wrong. So they came up with The Constitution, a set of rules and guidelines, basics. Do whatever you want, as long as your law doesn’t violate the consitution. Some of our laws don’t direcly violate freedoms, just define the parameters, the boundaries of that freedom — you can say whatever you want, but you can’t incite a riot, and you can’t openly threaten the life of the president. These are reasonable limits.

I should probably stop my lecture now, but it’s like they get hot and bothered, but don’t have any grasp of way this country works!

Rptrcub

May 16th, 2008

It takes a strong person to admit they were wrong, Daniel.

Jarod

May 16th, 2008

Though there are very few things from your “ex-gay” experiences that you are truly ashamed of (I sincerely hope that means that you didn’t encourage others to go down that road) I would assume that there are at least a few things that you regret.

StraightGrandmother

May 25th, 2012

That’s okay Daniel Gonzales, it is never to late to say you’re sorry. We all have regrets in life. Hopefully our regrets make us work harder to right the wrong.

Sincerely,
StraightGrandmother

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.