February 5th, 2009
The New Hampshire House Judiciary Committee today will hear testimony on two competing bills on same-sex marriage. One bill would repeal New Hampshire’s 2007 civil unions law and further ban same-sex marriage. The bill one would enact same-sex marriages, and provide couples who already entered into a civil union the right to upgrade their legal status to that of a marriage.
New Hampshire Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson will testify in favor of legalizing same-sex marriages.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Joel
February 5th, 2009
Which one is most likely to succeed?
And…
TALK ABOUT OPPOSING VIEWS!
Suricou Raven
February 5th, 2009
None, I would guess. If the legislature approved civil unions in 2007, what is the chance they will ban them again now?
As states go, it’s a quite blue one. 58% democratic, 40% republican (2% empty, and one lonely independant).
At the same time, that’s 40% who are sure to vote against gay marriage – so it wouldn’t take many democrats dissenting to prevent passage of that bill.
I’m guessing that this is going to be a party issue, and the parties are balanced enough that each will be able to block the other.
Timothy Kincaid
February 5th, 2009
Suricou Raven,
We cannot blindly assume that Republicans in New England are anti-gay.
In the 2007 vote in the house for civil unions, 5 Democrats voted no and 26 Republicans voted yes. We don’t know how that would translate when it comes to marriage, but it does show that we cannot make assumptions.
Pender
February 6th, 2009
Yeah, the Granite state has a libertarian streak a mile wide. Could be that they (rightly) see civil rights and equality as libertarian causes — getting the government out of the business of judging us morally for things that do not affect anyone but ourselves.
Trevor
February 6th, 2009
I disagree. I find it perfectly reasonable to assume all Republicans will vote against same-sex marriage ALL the time (cynicism). This is the only responsible assessment of the likely voting outcome. Granted a few Republicans may vote for marriage equality. Like all cynics I’ll be secretly pleased when and if my assumptions are disproven.
John
February 6th, 2009
Then you’d be wrong, Trevor. Even though a large majority of Republican voters did support such amendments in states where they have passed, sizeable minorities did not. Let’s not forget that large numbers of Democrat voters also voted for these amendments in these states as well.
Timothy Kincaid
February 6th, 2009
Trevor, you may wish to be secretly pleased about Wyoming. Sixteen Republicans (39%) joined all Democrats to defeat an anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment. Had this been a party line vote, it would be on the ballot.
Leave A Comment