April 8th, 2009
The Vermont Senate and House today voted to override the governor’s veto and provide marriage equality for all citizens of that state. And the city council for the District of Columbia voted to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions. All three of these legislative bodies are made up of members who stand for regular free and fair elections. So how does the Family “Research” Council’s Tony Perkins react to today’s news?
“Same-sex ‘marriage’ is a movement driven by wealthy homosexual activists and a liberal elite determined to destroy not only the institution of marriage, but democracy as well”
That’s right. Overwhelming votes by representatives of the people are destroying democracy.
There are more winger reactions here.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
homer
April 8th, 2009
Every night I retire to my underground command center and order my minions to work harder to destroy The Institution of Marriage. But every night they report back to me that Straight Man and Straight Woman, my arch-nemesises (nemesi?) are already busy destroying Traditional Marriage! Curse them! Bawahahahahaha!
Joel
April 8th, 2009
It is so intriguing to understand their attempt at reason and logic, or maybe under which variation of faith do they figure ““Same-sex ‘marriage’ is a movement driven by wealthy homosexual activists and a liberal elite determined to destroy not only the institution of marriage, but democracy as well— out.
Devon
April 8th, 2009
They realized they couldn’t use their standard talking points of “imposition” and courts going against the will of the people.
Naturally, it’s still hard to remove the propaganda programming, but that it took such groups as the AFA, the FRC, Focus on the Family, CWA, and others so many hours to produce their public statements compared to other gay marriage announcements, they’re realizing they’ll have to change some of the rhetoric. Even if it all is still backwards to the notion of democracy and the purpose of the courts.
Scott
April 8th, 2009
Hey, the poor guys just had their “activist judges” argument destroyed by Vermont, so he needs a fall back position. His brain would explode if he had to actually consider it a actual civil rights issue. Religious Right types like Perkins always need an enemy, so he’s created one out of whole cloth, because in his limited worldview, “normal” people wouldn’t be for this. As common sense about this spreads, watch for the arguments from Perkins to head off the deep end even more.
Jason D
April 8th, 2009
It’s intriguing how Populist the RR has suddenly become. I have a feeling that they won’t accept marriage equality even if it was voted in by people.
They will continue to push the “will of the people” idea because we have yet to see marriage equality win when put to a popular vote — which shouldn’t surprise anyone. Looking at the history of civil rights, the public at large doesn’t really lead the way. Usually it is the courts and legislature first, and the people, upon seeing how the sky did not fall, basically accept reality. There are still those who believe blacks shouldn’t be free, or voting, and think this country would be better off if we never gave women the right to vote or own property.
scotte
April 8th, 2009
I think Perkins view is really quite simple – democracy consists of everyone else agreeing with him. Most of us got past that world view at age four or five, evidently Mr. Perkins missed that stage of development.
I wonder if the Democratic majority in Congress will have the courage to let DC keep to its own decisions (what was that line about “democracy” and “will of the people” again?).
Mustang Bobby
April 8th, 2009
“Same-sex ‘marriage’ is a movement driven by wealthy homosexual activists…
More right-wing nonsense. Where the hell are all these rich gay men? All the ones I meet make less than I do, and I’m not rich by any measurement.
Jason D
April 8th, 2009
Mustang, I’m unemployed, and before being laid off twice in the past year, I wasn’t wealthy by any means.
Emily K
April 8th, 2009
Two weeks ago I couldn’t afford to buy toilet paper because i chose to spend my money on food instead.
So smack down two myths – that of a wealthy gay, and that of a wealthy Jew.
Attmay
April 8th, 2009
Destroy democracy? How can we destroy what we, living in a representative republic, do not have (thank God)?
Timothy (TRiG)
April 9th, 2009
I think the USA, like most countries, does have democracy, Attmay. But it doesn’t have direct democracy. And a good thing too.
A representative republic is a form of democracy in which there are various balances so that laws are less likely to be brought in on a whim.
TRiG.
Leave A Comment