April 12th, 2009
From the Boston Globe:
The Senate will hold a hearing Wednesday on whether to make New Hampshire the fourth state to allow gay couples to marry.
The House narrowly passed the measure last month. Democratic Gov. John Lynch opposes gay marriage but has not said specifically that he would veto it.
Someone should inform the Globe that though Iowa is outside of New England, it still is a state. New Hampshire would be the sixth state to allow gay couples to marry and the fifth in which same-sex marriages could still be performed.
State sanctioned same-sex marriages were allowed in the following order:
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
elaygee
April 12th, 2009
veRmont
Timothy Kincaid
April 12th, 2009
thanks, fixed
patrick
April 12th, 2009
Thank you for making the point about 5 states having recognized the right although only 4 recognize it.
As the stories of Iowa and Vermont broke recently, it drove me crazy that so many news outlets just ignore California.
Even if Prop 8 is upheld by the court, the fact is that the court determined that same-sex couples have the right to be married.
The electorate took it upon themselves to strip (or try to anyway) a minority group of their constitutional rights.
It may be a minor distinction, but it is a very important one.
HappyCat
April 12th, 2009
The year, 2090 in a 6th History class. A student stands up and mentions California taking away Civil Rights. And at the same time, African-Americans are still a minority and there is a constitutional amendment on the ballot to make African-Americans property and slaves again. All will be legal because the precedent was set in 2008 to do so. And the people wanting to make African-Americans slaves again refer to the bible and claim it is God’s Law.
nuncio
April 13th, 2009
I agree HappyCat –
Slavery *is* in the bible. Also don’t forget that women are also considered the property of men, and have no rights whatsoever.
As in the words of Mythbusters – this one’s “Plausible”
jb
April 13th, 2009
Maine will have a hearing on similar legislation on April 22th at 9 am at the Statehouse in Augusta!
oddjob
April 14th, 2009
Thank you for making the point about 5 states having recognized the right although only 4 recognize it.
But CA’s court decision was reversed. If you’re going to use supreme court decisions as the benchmark then Hawaii was the first state to recognize gay marriage, in 1995; Alaska was the second.
Timothy Kincaid
April 14th, 2009
oddjob,
The listing is of those states in which same-sex marriages legally occured (as the Globe put it “state to allow gay couples to marry”).
Thus neither Hawaii nor Alaska are on the list.
Further, the CA Supreme Court was not “reversed”. Language was added to the State Constitution that would make the decision moot but, as the Court has heard arguments against the constitutionality of this language, the situation is in limbo. It would be inaccurate, as well as disrespectful to the 18,000 or so couples who legally married, to act as though they did not take place.
Leave A Comment