New Hampshire Voters Support Marriage

Timothy Kincaid

April 28th, 2009

The New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition is reporting that a poll by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center finds support for marriage.

A poll released today by New Hampshire Freedom to Marry shows that 55% of New Hampshire Voters support marriage for lesbian and gay couples, while 39% are opposed.

The Senate will vote on the marriage bill tomorrow.

quo III

April 28th, 2009

That’s strange – the title of your post seems to be missing a word. Shouldn’t there be a ‘gay’ between ‘Support’ and ‘Marriage’? Supporting marriage isn’t automatically the same thing as supporting marriage between people of the same sex – not in the real world.

Bruno

April 28th, 2009

@quo III: tell that to the “National Organization for Marriage” too. Have you? Because being “for Marriage” in the real world means any kind of marriage, including same-sex. Have you told them this?

Duncan

April 28th, 2009

It’s a matter of context. No post on this blog would say “support” for what it opposes. Support is for friends.

Eddie89

April 28th, 2009

I would rather have the headline read: “New Hampshire Voters Support Marriage Equality”

Are there going to be two forms of marriage? Straight or gay? Or just marriage. Period.

Marriage Equality, people! Marriage Equality!

quo III

April 28th, 2009

Bruno, you’re wrong as a matter of logic. What you’re saying is equivalent to suggesting that if one is in favour of sex one is in favour of any kind of sex, including rape, incest, bestiality, and whatever else. Being in favour of something in general does not mean that one is in favour of absolutely all forms of it.

Jason D

April 28th, 2009

quo, rape is not sex.

There’s nothing wrong with the title. Sorry, but the times are changing. Check out m-w.com’s definition of the word “marriage” since at least 2004, marriage, according to well established dictionary, includes same sex couples.

Priya Lynn

April 28th, 2009

Quo III the National Oraganization “For” Marriage is not for marriage – they are against marriage for all people.

quo III

April 28th, 2009

Jason D, I’m not going to try to argue about the definition of sex with you. I’ll just say that your view of rape is not correct, and leave it there.

Priya Lynn: the NOW is for marriage as they define it, and they have at least as much right to their definition as anyone else.

Bruno

April 29th, 2009

@quo III: You just proved my point then. If the author of this article prefers same-sex marriage over other forms of marriage, then he is in the right to title it this way, just as NOM can title their organization to reflect their own view of marriage.

Unless what you’re trying to say is that there’s only one “correct” view of what marriage is, which I think is true. In that case, I’m proud to say, you are as far from right as can possibly be. Have a nice day :)

Ephilei

April 29th, 2009

The decision is whether lesbian and gay couples should get married, get “unioned,” or live without legal recognition. Getting them heterosexually married is not an option. (Sorry, Exodus.) In this context, marriage = gay marriage. In another context, like heterosexual marriage, it could mean something else.

More importantly: Yippee! The tide is turning!

Priya Lynn

April 29th, 2009

Quo III the National Oraganization “For” Marriage may ostensibly be “for” heterosexual marriages but none of their actions are in support of those marriages. Their reason for being and all of their actions are aimed at opposing same sex marriages, thus they are far more of a National Organization AGAINST marriage than in any conceivable way an organization “for” marriage.

Dave

April 29th, 2009

legislation that will enhance civil rights protections, while also protecting our freedom of speech

I have to hand it to Obama — the man’s got balls.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1979: Gay Law Students Challenge Pacific Telephone's Hiring Practices -- and Win

Today In History, 1986: Scientists Trace HIV to 1951

Born On This Day, 1819: Walt Whitman

Born On This Day, 1918: Bob Hull

Emphasis Mine

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1980: Tickets, Tux, and a Court Order -- A Male Couple Attends Senior Prom

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.