ADF Sues Michigan Group For Disrupting Church Services

Jim Burroway

May 15th, 2009

Photo from the

The Alliance Defense Fund, an a Scottsdale-based anti-gay legal group, has filed a federal lawsuit against the “Bash Back!” anarchists who invaded a church during morning worship services near Lansing, Michigan. Here is the ADF’s statement:

Alliance Defense Fund attorneys filed suit in federal court Wednesday against a radical anarchist group that openly advocates the use of riots and crime to further its views in favor of homosexual behavior. ADF attorneys filed the suit on behalf of Delta Township\’s Mount Hope Church against the group “Bash Back!,” which invaded the church\’s building during a worship service on Nov. 9 of last year.

“The use of violent threats and criminal behavior to make a political point should never be acceptable in America,” said ADF Senior Counsel Gary McCaleb. “Bash Back! revealed how dangerous the homosexual agenda is to our First Liberty, religious freedom. ADF filed this suit to stop Bash Back! and other activist groups from invading churches, disrupting worship, silencing pastors, and terrifying adults and children who attend religious services.”

A local news account of what happened is here. The ADF cites a clause of the “Freedom to Access To Clinics Act,” which was intended to protect those who provide or obtain abortions. That clause also protects places of worship by prohibiting actions by anyone who:

(2) by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship;

What “Bash Back!” did was clearly inexcusable and against the law. It was also abyslmally stupid. My dad used to tell me that even a broken clock is right twice a day. I think this is the first time I’ve ever said this about the ADF, but the ADF and Mount Hope Church are very much in the right. “Bash Back!” clearly and deliberately violated Mount Hope’s First Amendment rights and should be held accountable for it.

jOHN

May 15th, 2009

Not that I am supporting this group but I wonder if any of the church members realize that what they felt that morning many young gay people feel every day of their lives.

Clancy

May 15th, 2009

Unfortunately, the anti-gays will use this as further ammunition on how much we “hate” Christians and will do everything we can to destroy society. For our part there will be some hand wringing for a while to see who will say what. While I am not condoning what they did, do these people get nervous when a certain Kansas group pickets funerals? I guess I am a little tired of us not being able to just say, “These people do NOT represent the gay community. We are just as appalled by their behavior as you are. Stop trying to make it seem that they are only following “the gay agenda”.”.

SharonB

May 15th, 2009

Is Bash Back a gay advocacy group, an anachist group, or both?

Please don’t tell me they are are members of some anarco-sydicalist commune.

a. mcewen

May 15th, 2009

Bash Back means nothing to me. It’s a counterproductive group of pseudo revolutionaries who does the lgbt community more harm than good. It’s transitory visibility at its worse. I hope we do what we can to distinguish legitimate lgbt groups from this group.

Rick in Kansas

May 15th, 2009

Given the ADF’s string of losses in challenging NY Gov. Patterson’s executive order recognizing out of state same sex marriages, the “good christian lawyers” really need a win against teh gays to bolster their flagging image. So why not take on such an easy case as this? They aren’t likely to get a dime out of the community’s version of wannabe anarchists, but they get a nice symbolic victory of defending this “poor beseiged church” against the evil homoSEXuals and that can’t hurt in their own fundraising efforts.

Tommy

May 15th, 2009

One of the fun things about Bash Back is that they are anti-gay marriage activists. Straight (pun intended) from their myspace page…

“State recognition in the form of oppressive institutions such as marriage and militarism are not steps toward liberation but rather towards heteronormative assimilation.”

Personally I think we need to make very clear that they are Maggie Gallagher’s problem, not ours.

JJQR

May 16th, 2009

I’d love to see those pink-hooded fools try to pull that in a black church in a black neighborhood.

MCR

May 16th, 2009

I totally agree that Bash Back was in the wrong, but just as a point of clarification, they can’t violate a chruch’s first amendment rights. The first amendment guarantees the freedom to practice religion free from government interference.

Saying Bash Back violated the church’s first amendment rights buys into the same line of reasoning that allows any people like Carrie Prejean to say their first amendment rights are violated because others disagree with them.

Buffy

May 16th, 2009

I’m not supporting the actions of Bash Back. However I find it ironic the ADF is suing citing a law they and their ilk commonly claim violates their “religious freedoms” since it requires them to remain a certain distance from clinics and women seeking reproductive health care services. (Apparently it’s necessary to make physical contact with a woman to “provide abortion alternatives” and they pine for the good old days when they could get right into a woman’s face and beat the Love Of God into her. )

Timothy (TRiG)

May 18th, 2009

Interrupting church services was a part of the Suffragette Movement.

TRiG.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: New York Times Looks At "Homosexuals In Revolt"

Today In History, 1977: "The Advocate" Reports Another FBI Document Dump On Gay Rights Groups

Today In History, 1977: Houston Klan: "We Endorse and Seek the Execution of All Homosexuals"

Today In History, 1988: Canada's Largest Protestant Church Accepts Gay Ordination

Born On This Day, 1917: Chuck Rowland

Born On This Day, 1957: Stephen Fry

Activists Urge Indonesian Court to Criminalize Homosexuality

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.