Cheney Reiterates Marriage Support

Timothy Kincaid

June 1st, 2009

Washington Post:

Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday he supports gays being able to marry but believes states, not the federal government, should make the decision.

“I think, you know, freedom means freedom for everyone,” Cheney said in a speech at the National Press Club. “I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish, any kind of arrangement they wish.”

Update: Here’s the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9fdHMItz_0

Matt

June 1st, 2009

Almost seems crazy that a man can support (or claim to) marriage equality and then turn around and endorse torture.

Mike

June 1st, 2009

Well…he’s steps ahead of Obama on this one. Color me shocked.

Kevin

June 1st, 2009

I’m confused. Should I like Cheney or hate him now?

steve

June 1st, 2009

WHO CARES REALLY…he is an idiot!

but it is obama that im dissapointed in!! where is he on GLBT–in the closet???????

Rick Brentlinger

June 1st, 2009

I am thankful former VP Cheney openly supports our right to gay marriage.

I applaud his willingness to voice his support in public.

POTUS Obama and so many Democrat leaders have openly voiced their opposition to gay marriage yet some gays still support them and “hate” Cheney.

Odd position, that.

As far as Cheney supporting torture, that’s just silly rhetoric.

The “torture” you reference (enhanced interrogation) is not torture, according to Obama’s Attorney General Holder, who in Congressional testimony in the last two weeks, declined to describe enhanced interrogation as torture.

And for the record, Navy SEALS and a good number of other U.S. Military personal are subjected to water boarding as part of their training, which is one of the reasons Attorney General Holder, testifying before Congress, declined to describe it as torture.

Kith

June 1st, 2009

Isn’t it disingenuous to say “Freedom means freedom for everyone, unless The State says it doesn’t.”

Something is either a right or a person is free, if The State (or The States) get to decide who has this freedom/right, then a person isn’t free to do as they wish, they are slave to the whim of The State, and they don’t have the right to do something, they have a privilege. If one removes the portability of marriage, which let the states decide this issue for themselves does, then a a person becomes a prisoner to those states that allow it and stops being an American citizen.

When he so cavalierly says “But there should be no federal mandate” what he says is married gays stop being American citizens. This is hardly a commitment to the idea that “Freedom is freedom for everyone”. It’s more honest to say his point is “Freedom means freedom only for those who the majority of the states like.”

Ben in Oakland

June 1st, 2009

““I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish, any kind of arrangement they wish.”

HE’s made this statement several times before. Maybe i just have a hard time taking anything the man says at face value, but I don’t see this as supporting marriage equality. It is like what so many anti-gays say: you can do whatever you want, just don’t expect any legal benefits or recognition.

Not the same thing at all.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

Born On This Day, 1918: Leonard Bernstein

Texas Leads A Five-State Lawsuit Over Obamacare Transgender Rules

Wikileaks Outs Saudi Gay Men, Male Rape Victims, People With HIV

Is Australia's Marriage Equality Plebiscite Doomed?

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: New York Times Looks At "Homosexuals In Revolt"

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.