The Daily Agenda for Thursday, May 23
It's Not the Principle, It's the Prejudice
Congratulations Mitch!
Gay Couples Excluded from Immigration Bill Markup
How To Spot A Swivel-Eyed Loon
The Daily Agenda for Wednesday, May 22
House of Commons officially passes marriage equality
British Commons Approves Marriage Equality Bill
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Why Does This Flag Only Have 6 Stars? « Camels With Hammers
July 6th, 2009 | LINK
[...] Click here for the answer. This entry was written by Dan Fincke, posted on July 6, 2009 at 3:39 am, filed under Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. « Towards A “Non-Moral” Standard Of Ethical Evaluation [...]
Christopher Waldrop
July 6th, 2009 | LINK
I heard about this flag on the NPR program Studio 360. It was one of several offered up as an “alternative” to the rainbow flag.
I like this design, but, needless to say, I hope in time it will be more filled-in.
Jim Burroway
July 6th, 2009 | LINK
The beauty of this flag is that whenever it is filled in, it could be argued that there would be no need for a separate rainbow flag.
Cthulhu\'s Quill
July 6th, 2009 | LINK
Two more and it could be a dipper!
Scott
July 6th, 2009 | LINK
Of course, those of us residents who live in the District of Columbia will be left out of a National Symbol yet again. Ironic considering that there are large chances that we could become that 7th star on the flag in the next few days.
Equal marriage recognition from other jurisdictions is set to become law tomorrow (July 7, 2009). It’s pretty much a test case for introducing full gay and lesbian marriage rights by the City Council later this fall.
Go figure.
Marriage Equality Flag « Play Happy.
July 7th, 2009 | LINK
[...] Via Box Turtle Bulletin. [...]
Rebecca Juro
July 7th, 2009 | LINK
Interesting how you count Mass. and NH as deserving of stars for having marriage rights even though neither state has any legal protections for its transgender citizens.
I frankly find your qualifications to be considered worthy of a star on your flag to be at best flawed and at worst outright discriminatory.
As the kids say, Epic Fail.
Burr
July 7th, 2009 | LINK
It’s the marriage equality flag, not the trans rights flag. Though I’d like to see one of those, too.
Jason D
July 7th, 2009 | LINK
Rebecca you appear to have skipped over the first sentence of the post, here it is again(bold is mine):
“This six star “Flag of Equal Marriage” represents the six states which have marriage equality, by order of their entry into the Union.”
As the kids say: EPIC READING FAIL.
Emily K
July 7th, 2009 | LINK
Obvious flame war is obvious, as we say.
I understand where Rebecca is coming from. The contest was for a new LGB*T* flag. And this one only represents gays. It’s a wonderful flag. It’s a great symbol and I’d like to see it adopted.
But I don’t agree that it could truly replace the rainbow flag, as it only covers a single issue in the gay community.
Jason D
July 7th, 2009 | LINK
Emily,
Just to clarify, the flag’s home page is here:
http://makeitequal.org/
As you can see, it’s based on a suffragette protest flag. They do not mention the contest. Their facebook page only mentions it was chosen for the contest.
By way of context, it appears, at least, that the flag was designed first and then the contest came along later and they decided to enter. Or at least the flag does not appear to be designed specifically for the contest. So no one designed this flag to intentionally forget the transgender folk. It appears this flag was created for a specific issue, much like the white knot or the red ribbon.
You do have a point, however, that as a replacement for the rainbow flag, it’s underqualified as marriage equality isn’t the only LGBT issue. I agree. But that’s not what the article here, or the original flag’s creator is saying. It’s what the contest is saying.
Rebecca seems to have missed the point that the flag wasn’t designed to address the LGBT community at large. She seems to have missed what the flag was created for, and conflating the purpose of the contest with the motivation for the flag creation.
Of course, it doesn’t help that studio360 seems to either have two contests running, or has decided to call this contest both the”Gay Flag Design Challenge” and something called the “Listener Design Challenge” so it’s difficult to tell what’s going on.
Leave A Comment