DADT’s Repeal Has A New Quarterback
Jim Burroway
July 9th, 2009
Iraq War Veteran and former West Point Military Academy professor Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA) says that now is the time for Congress to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoricThe Daily Agenda for Saturday, February 11
The Daily Agenda for Friday, February 10
Again anti-gays blindly and gleefully shoot themselves in the foot
Rep. Walsh leads with her heart
Advocate, WaPo, AP Get it Wrong On Anti-Homosexuality Bill
Uganda Executive, Parliament Tussle Over Anti-Homosexuality BIll
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, February 9
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 450 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Richard W. Fitch
July 9th, 2009 | LINK
Now here is a “fierce advocate”! He makes a very important point in why the POTUS has proceeded in the fashion he has: the law was enacted by Congress, it is by the authority of Congress that it must be repealed. Dismissing or suspending the law would put Obama in the same category as Bush with his signing statements. Thanks for posting the video.
John
July 9th, 2009 | LINK
I do not know much about Murphy, but given his backround I find this to be encouraging. I’ve always thought that this issue was best left up to gay vets and their allies to push forward instead of civilian activists. Perhaps this is why I prefer groups like Servicemembers United over SLDN.
Richard W. Fitch
July 9th, 2009 | LINK
@John: Have no fears about Patrick Murphy!! He was one of the most outspoken members of the committee that held hearings on DADT last summer. During the testimony by Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness, he used every word he could think of that came just short of calling her an arrogant, ignorant, pompous homophobe. I watched it on C-SPAN. It was one of the rare times I have actually stood up and cheered a politician during a newscast. Here’s a link to the BTB account, July 24 ’08:
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/24/2421
Richard W. Fitch
July 9th, 2009 | LINK
And a YouTube clip of Murphy at the hearing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7JieekkebU&NR=1
Hopes this gives added confidence for all to the ability of Murphy to usher the repeal of DADT
Regan DuCasse
July 9th, 2009 | LINK
Well, how many is it going to take?! Most of the American public supports open service. The hearing proved how many service members already know their colleagues are gay and don’t care. The coalition forces from Britain and so on have had openly gay service members for years, and gay and lesbian soldiers live and work in these close environments and don’t validate the impetus for the policy in the first place.
Isn’t all this proven to be way past academic as it is?
All this and STILL the tippy toe around an all out repeal?
So just WHAT will it take? How many speaking against DADT will it take?
gar
July 9th, 2009 | LINK
There’s an old Vulcan proverb, only Nixon can go to China. Rep. Murphy is our Nixon for this fight. Good man.
John
July 10th, 2009 | LINK
Richard: Oh yeah, I remember that. Donnelly came across as a complete…well, imbecile let’s say. Good times. :-)
Leave A Comment