July 31st, 2009
The National Organization for Marriage is right. Gay marriage IS a religious freedom issue. They’ve just identified the wrong party as victim.
Currently in the US, and much of the Western World, there are churches that devoutly believe that their faith calls for same-sex couples to enter into marriage, protected by family, conducted by church, and supported by state. Other churches do not think that chruch or state should recognize same-sex marriages.
Governments have taken sides.
They have declared that because some churches don’t wish to sanctify marriages, that therefore the state will not recognize the marriages conducted by other churches. Even the most casual glance will reveal that behind every argument against marriage equality is one theme, an argument that is never absent and which never takes a back seat to any secular claims: “I demand that the state endorse and enforce my anti-gay religious beliefs about marriage.”
Any rational person will see this for what it is: state sponsored religious preference of one church over another. In the restriction of marriage equality, it is not only same-sex couples who have lost their rights; churches have as well. But, for a number of reasons, this is seldom a part of the argument.
Now the Quakers (the Society of Friends) in Britain are highlighting this injustice. (BBC)
One of the UK’s oldest Christian denominations – the Quakers – looks set to extend marriage services to same-sex couples at their yearly meeting later.
The society has already held religious blessings for same-sex couples who have had a civil partnership ceremony.
But agreeing to perform gay marriages, which are currently not allowed under civil law, could bring the Quakers into conflict with the government.
In the UK, same-sex civil partnerships are called “marriages” in the press and in conversation, but there is one very peculiar restriction that sets these unions apart from truly being marriages: churches are barred from conducting marriage civil partnerships or allowing them on their premises. Civil Unions must be held in a civic space like a hall and there can be no religious component.
This is not acceptable to Quakers.
The Quakers – also known as The Religious Society of Friends – are likely to reach consensus on the issue of gay marriage without a vote at their annual gathering in York on Friday.
They will also formally ask the government to change the law to allow gay people to marry.
Often those who oppose equality speak in aggreived tones of a need to protect religious freedom. It will be interesting to see how anti-gay activists respond to this plea by devout Christians for a right to practice their faith.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Burr
July 31st, 2009
Wow. That’s a really odd wrinkle on things. What in the hell was the reasoning behind that? Has it really been enforced?
Priya Lynn
July 31st, 2009
I’m shaking my head in disbelief. It amazes me that they would bar churches from conducting marriages or allowing them on their premises. Also stunningly ironic that despite the anti-gays false claims that their freedom of religion is being violated it is actually the pro-gay churches whose freedom of religion is being violated.
tavdy79
July 31st, 2009
The ban is on performing a civil, legal ceremony in temples, rather than a purely religious ceremony. If it were on the latter the British government would be in breach of article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The issue for Quakers is that by being unable to perform the civil ceremony we’re unable to treat same-sex couples the same as opposite sex ones – gay couples HAVE to have two ceremonies. Most divorcees have to have two separate ceremonies, however that decision is purely up to the religious order, it’s not a legal requirement.
Zeke
July 31st, 2009
We in the United Church of Christ have been making the point that OUR religious liberty and the religious liberty of other gay affirming churches/synagogues/temples are the ONLY faith groups that have EVER been denied “freedom of religion and expression? in this whole same-sex marriage debate.
No one has told conservative churches that they have to marry people they don’t want to. They deny marriage to all kinds of couples and NO ONE has even threatened to deny them the right to do so. But churches like mine are specifically told by the government that we can’t marry certain members and certain couples in our church family. The government is directly impinging on the expression of our religious beliefs that all people are created equal and deserving of full civil, human and spiritual equal rights.
BCCanuck
August 1st, 2009
Quakers (unformed silent service) are wonderful.
“It will be interesting to see how anti-gay activists respond to this plea by devout Christians for a right to practice their faith.”
Here in Canada the anti-gay activists write bitter tirades against the United Church of Canada: they call it a “pseudo-Christian cult empty of biblical Christian theological content.” Other LGBT-affirming faith communities fare even worse. So, what else is new?
Christopher Waldrop
August 3rd, 2009
Zeke said, “No one has told conservative churches that they have to marry people they don’t want to.” And this is exactly the issue. Many conservative churches have insisted, contrary to the facts, that their rights are somehow threatened by same-sex marriage, and that they will be “forced” to perform such marriages.
How many times does it have to be pointed out to them that they won’t be forced to perform any marriage they don’t want to before they’ll finally admit it? Maybe same-sex marriage will have to be legalized before those conservative churches will stop lying.
Leave A Comment