Mormon/Boy Scout sexual abuse problem
"Not Equal" Flag Debuted in New York DADT Protest
"Not Guilty, Not Ashamed, and Not Finished"
Anti-gay general's comments infuriate the Dutch
ENDA Sit-ins Result in Arrests in DC and San Francisco
Anti-Gay Group Sells Snakeoil
Schumer Argues for LGBT Incusion in Immigration Reform
Ex-Gay Ministry Admits Sexual Abuse; Grateful At Not Being Found Out
Featured Reports
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than two hundred posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Lindoro Almaviva
October 12th, 2009 | LINK
OK, let me try to understand this:
We are in a time of war…
The commanders in those war fronts are seriously understaffed…
The commanders of said war fronts are begging for more soldiers…
The military will continue dismissing soldiers because they are gay…
Makes sense to me.
[/sarcasm]
Richard W. Fitch
October 12th, 2009 | LINK
With approximately 70% of the voters in favor of repeal and the military printing op-eds both in MSM and their own journals calling for repeal, how much ‘political capital’ does Obama need to persuade Congress that DADT no longer serves any viable purpose ….. as though it ever did?????
Leonard Drake
October 12th, 2009 | LINK
I don’t know whether I am actually at the point of switching parties (from either Democratic to Independent, or Democratic to Green), but…
I, for one, am growing sick and tired of being used for my “capital” at election time, promised the LGBT community will not be forgotten by the Democratic party at the Federal level, and when a wonderful opportunity now arrives, “there is no indication that [Obama]’s going to spend his political capital in that way.” Once again, the LGBT community has been swept back into the political closet of “‘that’ way.”
When will this change? If DADTDP is NOT acted upon soon, I fear interest will fade in the next Congressional session, as the focus of our Congressional Representatives and Senators will turn toward reelection efforts and not actual “representation.”
Burr
October 12th, 2009 | LINK
Do these guys look at the polls at all? Getting rid of DADT would win them serious points and show they aren’t a bunch of do-nothings. How can they pass up such a slam dunk?
Democrats are morons, period.
Kayla
October 12th, 2009 | LINK
Can he not just sign an executive order? How much political capital does that take? I think he’s stalling until he gets elected again. Giving the gays rights might turn away some votes, after all. http://www.newsy.com/videos/obama_i_will_end_don_t_ask_don_t_tell
John
October 12th, 2009 | LINK
Obama lied. Why is anyone surprised?
Richard Rush
October 12th, 2009 | LINK
My understanding is that Obama does NOT have the authority to end DADT by executive order, but that he DOES have the authority to impose a moratorium on the discharge (firing) of gay soldiers. Is that correct?
Kristie
October 12th, 2009 | LINK
RichardRush, you are correct. Obama could sign a “stop loss order” which would put a halt to the pursuit of any further investigations and dismissals of service members during a time of war. He could have done that on his first day in office but he doesn’t seem to have the moral courage to do the right thing unless it’s going to get him something.
If he signed the stop loss order it would halt the threat to gay service members for the moment and then he could give a nudge to congress about making repeal of DADT a priority. It’s not as if they would have a fight on their hands from constituents since a vast majority of the public (even the conservative public) thinks that DADT is a pointless policy that needs to go!
Leave A Comment