Perry v. Schwarzenegger: a very Republican conversation

Timothy Kincaid

January 11th, 2010

vaughn walkerVaughn R. Walker, the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, is a Republican. He was nominated for the bench by Republican President George H.W. Bush.

And though independently minded, Walker has taken positions in the past that show him not to be universally a gay advocate. In fact, Walker’s first nomination (by President Ronald Reagan) was held up due to controversy over a gay-related issue. Walker was representing the US Olympic Committee in their demand that the Gay Olympics (now the Gay Games) not be allowed to use “Olympics” in their name.

So when lead co-counsel Republican Ted Olson speaks to the court, it will be a very Republican conversation. This is important to recall when anti-gay activists scream about judicial activism and the bias of the court – which they have already begun to do.

Freedom!

January 11th, 2010

[The IP address from which this comment was sent is the same as that which is used by a commenter identifying himself as George78. Although some network providers can assign an IP address so that it may link back to more than one computer, neither of the email addresses provided are valid so we cannot verify this. Please note that while BTB does not share email addresses, a valid email address must be provided to participate in the conversation here at Box Turtle Bulletin]

Laughable. It’s well known that Wacko Walker is a homosexual himself.

Several other homosexualist blogs have been bragging about this. Do a bit of looking on the web.

The bias that he has displayed in this case is nothing short of incredible. He’s all but declared how he is going to rule.

If you think you can try to spin him as a Republican, you are very mistaken.

Priya Lynn

January 11th, 2010

When people post under names like “Freedom” or “Truth” they rarely stand for either.

“Freedom”, its a proven fact that Walker is a Republican. If its so “well known” that Walker is gay you’ll have no problem presenting proof of that – let’s see it.

Pardon?

January 11th, 2010

Wow, the religious extremists are already trying to discredit the Judge and/or put pressure on him! Who’d want to be a judge in America? No contempt of Court?

The issue he ruled on was nothing to do with the merits of the case, but rather the vast national and international interest in the case, and in us all having a good look at the evidence and arguments, pro and con. Of course fundamentalists are always primarily interested in silencing their opponents and so would not want them to have airspace, let alone run the risk of their own bigotry being exposed for what it is in front of a world audience.

Mr. “Freedom” (intended ironically I presume), if you want to credibly make such assertions about the judge in the case, you should back them up with evidence/links/quotes, and give your full name.

And there’s no such word as homosexualist, or I guess we’ll have to start talking about “christianists”. Though there’s nothing Christ-like about the prop 8 lobby.

Priya Lynn

January 11th, 2010

[The IP address from which this comment [Freedom!] was sent is the same as that which is used by a commenter identifying himself as George78.]“.

LOL, and George78 was getting all testy when people dared to assume he was on the anti-gay side in the Millers/Jenkins thread.

Evan Hurst

January 11th, 2010

Is it just me or is it only wingnuts who don’t comprehend that blog moderators can see IP addresses?

Wonder if it’s the same troll I caught on TWO posting the SAME COMMENT over and over again under several different names.

Harold Howard

January 11th, 2010

“Is it just me or is it only wingnuts who don’t comprehend that blog moderators can see IP addresses?”

So what? I guess you never heard of open Wi-fi or TorBrowser. LOL!

Amicus

January 11th, 2010

A “show trial”? A show trial?!

This is yet another, disgusting attack on the courts, by the growing Taliban in America, led by the Robbie P. George and his call to unlawful behavior in the Manhattan Declaration.

The idea that a Federal Court in the U.S. is capable of staging a show trial shows how depraved and craven opponents of marriage for committed gay couples are.

andrew

January 12th, 2010

Still, it’s very flattering to know that BTB has the attention of some conservative whackjobs. Congratulations, boys, you must be doing something terribly right.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Former Fox News Head Roger Ailes Loved Calling People "Faggot"

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1895: Oscar Wilde Enters Bankruptcy

This Month In History, 1919: A Plea From An Invert

Born On This Day, 1966: Sean Patrick Maloney

Orlando-Area Republicans Back LGBT Protections

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.