Indiana Senate votes for constitutional amendment to ban marriage equality

Timothy Kincaid

January 28th, 2010

The full Indiana Senate has voted to put a constitutional amendment on the ballot to restrict marriage to heterosexual couples. (WISH)

The state Senate passed a proposed constitutional amendment on gay marriage on a 38-10 vote late Thursday afternoon. The last time the Senate passed the proposal, the Indiana House blocked the effort to send it to a referendum.

The bill is unlikely to advance out of committee in the house, which is controlled by Democrats. Were it to do so, it would then need to be passed again by both houses after another election before being presented to the voters.

The bill, as presented, would ban both same-sex marriage and any “legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage“.

Robert in San Diego

January 28th, 2010

That’s great, in order for a constitutional amendment it must pass both chambers 2 times before going to the voters, You think my home state of California could of thought of something so important like that. So lets see here, denying Californians equal rights takes a 1 time majority vote but to try and pass a budget or anything else requires a 2/3 vote. WAY TO GO CALIFORNIA!

Eddie89

January 28th, 2010

Indeed, other states like Massachusetts and Connecticut also require very extreme and deliberate measures to modify their State Constitutions.

Perhaps it’s because California is a “newer” state and it’s founders wanted to be less “east coast” and so they made it possible to make changes to the constitution like it was nothing.

Sad… :-(

Lynn David

January 28th, 2010

I forget who is on the House committee; but the last time one of the democrats was a woman who was fence sitting. She literally broke into tears when she voted, not for us evidently, but wondering what her vote might do to her chances for re-election. We’ll have to hope someone isn’t in that position again. If it gets to the whole House it will pass, democrats will vote for it.

Timothy Kincaid

January 29th, 2010

Lynn David,

Interestingly, I don’t believe that there is a single legislator in any state who lost their reelection after voting for marriage or civil unions. Or so I read recently.

Lynn David

January 29th, 2010

I don’t think there was here either. But it is back in the same committee, the House Rules and Legislative Procedures Committee. They have two joint resolutions before them dealing with the definition of marriage, HJR-5 (the one like that the Senate passed) and HJR-7. Though both are nearly identical.

http://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2010/PDF/RES/HJ0005.1.pdf

http://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2010/PDF/RES/HJ0007.1.pdf

That committee has a lot of stuff to wade through
http://www.in.gov/apps/lsa/session/billwatch/billinfo?year=2010&request=getCommittee&committee_name=Rules+and+Legislative+Procedures&chamber=H

Mortanius

January 29th, 2010

Will just have to say “Shame on you Indiana, Shame on you”. Living here I know what goes on. It is the same 3-4 individuals who submit these bills even before the end of the first day of the session.

I find it amazing that at least here in the most northern of the southern states that bills like this need to pass two separate legislation session before advancing to the people for a simple majority vote. I have always said you don’t vote for civil rights, much less a simple majority vote.

To think that Pence was considering (maybe still) running against Bayh and Pence, as we know is one of the leaders of the anti-gay movement/teabaggers/ultra conservative.

Donnchadh

January 29th, 2010

Just a reminder: in its present wording, it seems to ban the state from recognising marriage of any sort.

AJD

January 29th, 2010

This is a sad development, but it’s a relief that Indiana doesn’t have a ballot initiative process like a lot of states out West do. It’s weird how the the Progressives (or was the the Populists? I don’t remember) in the early 1900s thought ballot initiatives were such a great way to rein in the stranglehold of big business on politics and the economy, but they never considered that, uh, the other side can use them too.

Kyle

January 29th, 2010

Geaux Saints!

Ray

January 29th, 2010

My husband is an Indiana native and he taught me that phrase Mortanius used about Indiana being the most northern of the southern states. We live in California but have ties to quite a few people in southern Indiana. It was quite a revelation to our Hoosier friends when, at age 86, my husband wrote to tell what seemed like most of Vincennes that he’d gotten married for the first time in his life. We’ve been together for 26 years but before me, my husband had a partner for 32 years who died at the age of 75. So it wasn’t a secret about my husband being gay.

We were inundated with well-wishes after our wedding announcement. The grapevine went into overdrive and people native to Indiana who had long ago moved away called and wrote to extend congratulations. There is hope in Indiana. It consists of the goodness of people like our friends, all of whom are straight. It’s just too bad their leaders don’t know about them, or simply don’t care.

Lynn David

January 30th, 2010

Well, Vincennes has always been known as a bit of a trendsetter in Indiana… oh, yeah, sure…. (I live on a farm just north of there.)

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

Today In History, 1954: Miami Mayor Calls for Anti-Gay Crackdown

Today In History, 1995: GOP Presidential Candidate Sen. Bob Dole Returns Donation from Log Cabin Republicans

Today In History, 1998: Lawyer Suggests Abortion If a Test Could Prove Fetus Has "Gay Gene"

Born On This Day, 1904: Christopher Isherwood

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.