Is same-sex marriage coming for Maryland residents?

Timothy Kincaid

January 28th, 2010

Due to the control of the Maryland Senate being in the hands of Senate President Mike Miller, a Democrat representing Calvert and Prince George’s Counties, and due to the strategic placement of Sen. C. Anthony Muse on the Judicial Proceeding Committee, there is little chance of Maryland voting to offer its gay citizens the same marriage rights that it joyously bestows on its heterosexual citizens. These two men are devoted enemies of equality.

However, marriage recognition may come in another way.

Maryland code section 2-201 says: “Only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid in this State.” However, Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler has been asked to determine whether same-sex marriages conducted outside the state must be recognized within Maryland. Currently, speculation is that it must. (Daily Record)

He has not disclosed when he will issue his opinion.

Gansler\’s silence has fueled speculation that he — a supporter of gay marriage — will suggest that Maryland must recognize same-sex marriages under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution. As interpreted by the Supreme Court, a state must extend full faith and credit to the laws of other states unless doing so would offend the state\’s public policy.

This question has taken on increased attention as we get closer to March 2, the day that Washington DC attains marriage equality (much of the Maryland population lives in suburbs of the Nation’s Capital). To ward off that possibility, Sen. Emmett Burns has introduce legislation to deny recognition to out of state same-sex marriages.

Today Mr. Burns testified in the Judiciary Committee of the horrors that could come with recognizing the vows and promises of these long-term, committed, devoted relationships.

“I believe that same-sex marriage is against the natural order,” said Del. Emmett C. Burns Jr., D-Baltimore County, the measure\’s sponsor.

I think it unlikely that Burns’ bill will win in the Senate. But it is fairly certain to fail in the House. In fact, should a bill allowing marriage equality be allowed to obtain a vote in the House, there is a good chance it would pass.

“We have the votes in the House to pass marriage equality,” said Del. Heather R. Mizeur, a Montgomery County Democrat. “There are not enough votes to get it out of [the Senate committee]. Until that happens, until there is some change of heart or change in political landscape or change of composition in that committee, that bill is going to have a hard time.”

If Gansler finds that Maryland must recognize the marriage occurring in Washington, that state may well join New York in recognizing but not conducting same-sex marriages.

volpi

January 29th, 2010

i do not understand if the recognition of same-sex marriages conducted in others jurisdictions attributes the rights of married couples under new york law.i have a friend who is going to marry in spain(his fiancè is spanish,he is italian)and he says that new york yet gives same-sex couples equal rights. i am not a native english speaker and i am sorry in case errors occur

occono

January 29th, 2010

New York doesn’t “fully” recognize them as I understand it, the option, not mandate, to recognize them is….is this right?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.