NH Rep. Nancy Elliot gives sex-ed lessons

Timothy Kincaid

February 12th, 2010

On Tuesday, New Hampshire Representative Nancy Elliot decided that a discussion over repealing the state’s marriage equality law could be spiced up a bit by a little discussion about anal sex.

QUEERTY.COM nancy elliot new hampshire from Queerty on Vimeo.

Rep. Nancy Elliot: We heard in this hearing one of the people came to testify and they said that this is not normal. And I had to think about it a while. Y\’know, what are we talking about?

And so, I started thinking, and we\’re talking about taking the penis of one man and putting it in the rectum of another man, and wiggling it around in excrement. And I had to think, I\’m not sure, would I allow that to be done to me? All of us, if something happened to you, would you let that happen to you?

Is that normal? Is that something that we want to portray as the same as the ‘one flesh union\’ between a man and a woman? I dunno.

Um, then, I started to think, I remember when we were having the testimony, people were saying that um, it was brought up that this would rise to the schools and I\’m thinking, “No, no. No no, that won\’t happen.”

Well I heard yesterday from a mother that in the fifth grade, in Nashua, they were giving um, they were given as part of their classroom instruction, naked pictures of two men showing presentation of anal sex.

Chairman David Cote: Representative Elliot, let\’s keep our discussion directly to the bill and not…

Elliot: This is directly to the bill!

Cuz, because we have made a marriage on same sex, they are now teaching it in the public schools. They are showing our fifth graders how they can actually perform this kind of sex.

And they are condoning, they are saying, “It\’s normal and this is something that you may want to try.” That is the context of the lesson, that this is something that you, as fifth graders, may want to try.

I see it as a real problem in our society. I see it as a real affront to our citizens that their children are suspected to this.

And so I think that it is important that we revisit what we did. We made a mistake. We should repeal it.

Oh, my.

It certainly would be newsworthy if ten year-olds were being encouraged to try anal sex. But it now appears that the telephone call that Nancy Elliot was talking about receiving may have occurred at some point when she forgot to wear her tinfoil hat. (Nashua Telegraph)

Superintendent Mark Conrad said that school officials have asked all elementary school principals about the claim. Conrad said there is no evidence to substantiate Elliott\’s comment and no parents have called to complain.

“We don\’t have any information that this has occurred,” Conrad said Friday.


February 12th, 2010

Lying for Jesus strikes again! Along with the singularly focused obsession only with what gay MEN do (and only SOME of them at that)..

And uhh.. Nancy should tell her husband (if she has one) that if he’s “wriggling it around in excrement” then he’s doing it wrong.. :P

Ditto all those who are “wriggling it around in menses.”


February 12th, 2010

A simple challenge I’ve never seen the bigots answer no matter how many of them I ask:

Can you name a single example of a major gay rights supporter or group being caught in a lie, like the one this article is about for example?

I’ve yet to find one person who can point to an example of us ‘immoral’ people lying while this website and dozens more have archives going back years with at least one of the major ‘moral’ groups being caught in a lie at least once a month, often once a day or once a week.

a. mcewen

February 12th, 2010

i’m glad someone called her out. when folks like her make outrageous statements, so many people either shake their heads or laugh that no one calls out the statement for the inaccuracy that it is.


February 12th, 2010

Okay, I would call her bluff!

Make anal sex illegal, but allow same-gender couples to legally marry!


February 12th, 2010

It sounds like Rep. Elliot needs to stop worrying about the bowels of gay men being full of excrement and focus her concerns a little closer to home.


February 12th, 2010

Like many, this poor lady has confused her own personal disgust (with something she seems to be spending a little too much time imagining) with morality.

Other people’s sexuality doesn’t bother me because it is not mine. And if you don’t like gay marriage, don’t get involved in one.


February 12th, 2010

Another lying politian! What do they think the people are all fools. The only ones that are folls are the homophob’s and Holy Rollers.


February 12th, 2010

I wish someone had responded, “And what does it matter? Whatever you do is going to disgust someone else.” But I’m glad that someone did their research and called her on her, um, excrement.


February 13th, 2010

Yet another politician who thinks their job properly involves fantasizing about the sex lives of people they don’t know or actually care about.


February 13th, 2010

Rep. Nancy Elliot is a liar!


February 13th, 2010

And folks keep re-electing these idiots who, rather than do research, grab a rumor and run with it.


February 13th, 2010

I suppose this just might be because I am in college, but a lot of my straight friends do anal as well, and it’s no big deal. When will people stop treating sex in its many, healthy forms as evil, immoral or whatnot? Sure, there are sex acts that are awful (incest, pedophilia, bestiality, et. al.), but not this one. Anal sex is not exclusively gay. Nor does it have to be dirty. No more so than vaginal sex, at least.

Richard Rush

February 13th, 2010

Nancy Elliott should read the comment by Confessor on the BTB post titled “Valentine’s Question: could you give it all up?” But Confessor’s moving story of love and devotion would likely be lost on Elliott.

Here is a person (Elliott) elected to represent all her constituents, and when confronted with the reality of loving relationships between certain human beings, all she is able to see are vivid images of the detailed mechanics of anal sex. Such a profound lack of human empathy should disqualify her from elective office.

Ben in Oakland

February 13th, 2010

Well, all Ican say is that Ms. Elliott has spent way to much time on the first page of xvideos.com while not wearing both her tin foil hat AND her glasses. Because all of those people who are enjoying getting their ecreta wiggled in seem to be women, though none of them seem to be Ms. Elliott.


February 13th, 2010

If nothing else, I don’t think it qualifies as “excrement” until it’s been excreted.

Regan DuCasse

February 13th, 2010

What IS it with these people?!

The public comportment of gay people doesn’t raise the ire, contempt, disgust that people like this woman thinks it SHOULD, so in a STATEHOUSE political meeting, she felt she just HAD to go THERE?!

There is NO venue too sacred or worthy of respect where a politician, or clergy member will refrain from graphic details regarding the assumed sex practices of gay people.

I’ve heard recordings of ministers in CHURCH (with children present) being just as graphic, I’ve heard Oral Roberts on national broadcasts from HIS church doing the same, and I’ve heard politicians like THIS one, and anti gay teachers as well in THEIR classrooms of 5th graders doing the same.

Apparently the stupidest irony isn’t lost on these people. These same ones who complain that gay people don’t have the proper RESTRAINT when it comes to having a sex life.

But apparently people like this state rep have none when it comes to describing it in detail in PUBLIC.

Ben in Oakland

February 13th, 2010

It creminds me of 30 years ago when I was fighting the briggs initiative. Briggs just LOVED to talk dirty. One of my favorites: “How would you like if you little boy went into a restroom and some homosexual put his penis into your son’s mouth?” This was in 1978.


February 13th, 2010

But apparently people like this state rep have none when it comes to describing it in detail in PUBLIC.

I gave up on conservative “morality” when I realized that the so-called moralists were always the most prurient fantasizers and sadly willing to engage in what they claimed to be better than.

Alex H

February 13th, 2010

First off, I wish I went to that school with the pictures of men having anal sex so at least I’d have a clue when I was 15.

Second, Elliot really should do more research before claiming what is and isn’t normal.

I can see why women wouldn’t like anal sex, but men have a prostate gland that’s the joy buzzer that’s hidden deep inside the body and can only be activated through that love tunnel, which makes anal sex very pleasurable. Too bad Elliot won’t ever experience it but it kind of shatters her concept of “normal” since nature must have thought why not? Otherwise why put it in such an out of the way area that really can only be accessed one way?

Thirdly, “squirming around in excrement” maybe that’s how she does it but I’m sure many of us do not.

And speaking of which, there are some women out there who have sex when on their periods–so they don’t get pregnant–or even when they’re pregnant and there are even some who have anal sex (not for their pleasure but for their dear husbands who want a “tighter fit”), so if Elliot wants to talk disgusting, that’s disgusting.

So she really shouldn’t go there when it comes to people and what they do in their private lives.


February 13th, 2010

I wish a reporter would ask Mrs. Elliott a simple question- has your husband ever wiggled his penis inside your vagina during your period? It would be interesting to hear her reaction.

Jason D

February 13th, 2010

“men have a prostate gland that’s the joy buzzer that’s hidden deep inside the body and can only be activated through that love tunnel, which makes anal sex very pleasurable. Too bad Elliot won’t ever experience it but it kind of shatters her concept of “normal” since nature must have thought why not? Otherwise why put it in such an out of the way area that really can only be accessed one way?”

Actually, you’re a little off. The penis starts right next to the prostate gland, it is activated simply by the penis rubbing against it during sexual activity.

In both anal sex and regular sex, a penis is rubbing against the prostate. In anal, it’s the partner, in regular, it’s you.


February 13th, 2010

Actually, Jason, your correction is incomplete.

It’s not just the vagina/penis connection, or penis/hand connection that causes pleasure; it boils down to certain nerve endings being activated by the rubbing.

Thus, women actually ALSO enjoy anal sex, they just don’t get the extra amplifier that’s prostate stimulation.


February 14th, 2010

Good point.

The complaint is ALWAYS “the gays want to make all this public! They want to push their sex lives in our faces! They want to teach this to children!”

And it is always the homophobes who are talking in graphic detail. It isn’t gay people going to the statehouse and giving these details. WE say “please leave us alone to do what works for us.” THEY say “Penis! Excrement! Man on dog sex!” and so on.

Oddly enough, there is one point that Rep Elliot makes that is worth noting – although she doubtless didn’t make it deliberately. It is apparent that she felt she was in a venue for adults, and that there are topics she feels can be discussed openly by adults with other adults without worrying what some far-off children might think, since they aren’t there.

Which is OUR point. We’re all adults. We should be able to talk about things like our rights and relationships, and if necessary, who does what to whom, with the same adult freedom that straight people do.

But you know damn well this same woman who so freely and explicitly condemned all gay men everywhere would be Shocked! and Offended! if someone even spoke about KISSING their same-sex partner, much less matched her wiggle for wiggle.

Christopher Waldrop

February 15th, 2010

A woman can be proud and stiff
When on love intent;
But Love has pitched his mansion in
The place of excrement;
For nothing can be sole or whole
That has not been rent.
-W.B. Yeats, Crazy Jane Talks With The Bishop

Those lines came to mind because Yeats was almost certainly talking about vaginal intercourse. And Jane may have been crazy, but she obviously understood both love and biology better than the Bishop to whom she was speaking–and Elliott for that matter.

Tru Agape

February 27th, 2010

As far as I’m concerned, anal sex is nasty, disgusting, unsanitary, and degrading. And I find it intersting that the only couple that can’t perform it is a homosexual one – a female homosexual one. Anal sex has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Both hetrosexuals and homosexuals can be guilty of this. This woman needs to take her face out of her own excrement and see the anal sex problem as a universal one. This lady needs to be smacked!

Priya Lynn

February 27th, 2010

Agape, if you don’t like anal sex then don’t have it but don’t try to dictate to other people what they should or shouldn’t do with their sex lives, its none of your business.

Timothy Kincaid

February 27th, 2010

Tru Agape,

We don’t advocate for “smacking” anyone here.

Tru Agape

February 28th, 2010


Timothy Kincaid

March 1st, 2010

no prob :)

Kinsey Report

April 12th, 2010

Nancy Kinsey ought to learn something about Human sexual Behavior. She might consult

http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Kinsey_Reports

and learn something about which she is obviously ignorant.

If she doesn’t want to engage in anal, oral, vaginal sex she could “Just Say No”. (Others may Just say Yes, Yes and Yes Again). I wouldn’t have any kind of social or sexual intercourse with this narrow minded, judgmental and ignorant person.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.