Vandalized LGBT Center Vows To Keep Anti-Gay Graffiti

Jim Burroway

March 2nd, 2010

UC Davis GraffitiA vandalized LGBT center at the University of California at Davis has vowed to keep the graffiti as reminder that as a reminder that intolerance still exists.

The anti-gay vandalism follows other anti-Semitic and racially-motivated hate incidents on campus. A Jewish student found a swastika carved into her dorm room door late last week, and several racially-charged incidents were prompted by an off-campus party that mocked African-Americans with urban stereotypes.

UC Davis officials are planning a town hall meeting in response to the events.


March 2nd, 2010

While I understand the LGBT’s reasoning for leaving the graffiti in place, I’m not entirely sure it’s such a good idea. After all, the center is there to help LGBT folk. Some of the LGBT folk they’re seeking to help are probably dealing with some pretty intense problems, and being confronted with such reminders of the hatred they face whenever they stop in to seek help could just make matters worse for them.

Priya Lynn

March 2nd, 2010

I agree Jarred. I think its a better idea to as much as possible make such places a respite from hatred, not a reminder of it.


March 2nd, 2010

Perhaps they could donate the door to an artist who could use it as part of an instillation on hate and intolerance. Then they can redo the entrance and make it more welcoming.


March 2nd, 2010

Yeah I would save it as a separate piece rather than leaving it intact.


March 2nd, 2010

So, after reading about the incident on the LGBT Community Center at UCDavis, it appears the university center is considering keeping the door “for a while,” not forever, nor for a while, but merely after they had enough time to educate the larger community about the impact of hatred.

Here is the actual statement from the university community center:

Finally, the referenced CBS weblink within this Box Turtle article was written before the actual community meeting took place (as was the statement from the community center I posted above), so I am unsure whether there was a definitive time limit placed on the definition of “a while.”


March 2nd, 2010

Actually as of the posting of this blog post the graffiti has already been taken down. Last night there was a community forum held by the Chancellor because this is not the first incident of descrimination on campus. After the meeting facilities went through and cleaned up the center. So it was left up for a few days to prove a point and then removed.

Regan DuCasse

March 2nd, 2010

Does Maggie Gallagher or all the pro Prop. 8 witnesses who say they’ve been threatened and that there is an ‘avalanche of hatred’ against them have as much evidence as WE do of who threatens who, where, when…and for how long?

Pictures with context are enduring enough evidence that such a thing exists and has for a long, LONG time.

When Maggie and Co can name at any time when gay people, en masse worked to involuntarily DIVORCE her from HER spouse and any other straight couple, not even THEN would she come close to knowing the experience she’s hijacking.

She’d never admit just how fortunate she is, because we know her cynicism better than we’d get credit for.


March 7th, 2010

Let’s take it further, Regan…

How many incidents have there been of gay youth gangs roaming the streets of gay enclaves seeking out breeders and beating them up, then having the local police dismiss the crime?

How many incidents are there of fundamentalist churches being broken into and/or vandalized?

How many incidences have there been of TLBG supervisors and business owners discriminating against straight employees?

How many incidences have there been of TLBG athletes ganging up on the popular kids and beating them up?

I can go on and on with this ad infinitum…


March 30th, 2010


Gays campaign for Hate Crime Protection while many gays committ Hate Crimes.

That’s hypocritical


March 30th, 2010

Chuck — where does it say gay people did it?

That’s right: it doesn’t. Not even the ever unreliable CBN said that. Given that straight supporters of ‘No on 8’ outnumber the gay supporters about 10 to 1… why couldn’t a pissed-off straight person have done it?

And what do you consider to be “many gays”? A couple of isolated acts of vandalism doesn’t even come close.

Somewhat ironically, one of your references also contains the lie from the LDS church that “they weren’t involved” in the anti-gay campaign. Now, of course, we all know that they were in fact deeply but secretly involved.

Is lying what you’d consider to be in a “spirit of mutual respect and civility”?

Come to think of it — given the LDS Church is a proven liar on this whole matter, who is to say that they didn’t vandalise their own church?

[Apart from that, I’d be more than content to see anyone charged with a hate crime if that is in fact what they have done. Religion is already protected. Hypocritically.]

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.