Gay Saudi Diplomat Seeks Asylum

Jim Burroway

September 12th, 2010

Ali Ahmad Asseri, the first secretary of the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles, has told NBC News that he has asked for political asylum in the United States. He has reportedly informed the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that Saudi officials have refused to renew his diplomatic passport after discovering that he was gay and close friends with a Jewish woman. He was questioned by a DHS official on August 30 after formally applying for asylum. DHS and Saudi officials decline to comment.

Without a diplomatic passport, Asseri has been effectively fired from his job and has no legal means of remaining in the U.S. In an email to NBC news, Asseri said, “My life is in a great danger here and if I go back to Saudi Arabia, they will kill me openly in broad daylight.”

Saudi Arabia follows Sharia law, which calls for the death penalty and/or lashings for homosexuality.

Timothy Kincaid

September 12th, 2010

This is a tough one.

Generally the US can be pretty decent about allowing gay people asylum if they are truly in danger (depending, of course, on what judge you get).

But being a diplomat complicates things.

Saudi Arabia is one of our closest allies in the Middle East and I can’t see the State Department allowing anything which would upset the delicate balance of our relationship.

I have no idea what will happen. I guess that depends on how insistent the Saudi family (several of whom more of less live in the US) are about his return. Unfortunately, he exacerbated things by insulting some princes.

Tim

September 12th, 2010

He should be given the chance to live in a third country, for instance here in the UK where there is already a large Saudi and Middle Eastern community, or somewhere else of his own choice.

Being gay and insulting minor royals should not be a capital crime.

I hope it works out for him.

Emily K

September 12th, 2010

I agree with Tim. insulting royalty and being gay are not things worthy of the death penalty. I hope he is given the chance to seek asylum in a third country.

Granted, I know I don’t know the whole story. But if those two things are what will put his life in danger, those two things are what I’m judging my opinion by.

Adrian-T

September 12th, 2010

If it were a just world ther would be no Saudi anything. It’s terrible that our close allies pour billions into spreading that murderously warped Wahhabi version of Islam around the world. The Saudi regime has filled madrassas, schools and mosques with hate preachers and literature; trained, armed and turned a blind eye to fanatics and terrorists in the middle east, kashmir, afghanistan and the former soviet muslim countries. Ultimately Britain takes the blame for setting this horrible little state up in the first place. (worth reading: Secret Affiars by Mark Curtis)

This poor diplomat’s chances are poor; the last thing the West wants is human rights aND democracy in any oilm rich country.

Other Fred in the UK

September 12th, 2010

I doubt that Her Majesty’s Government would be any keener on annoying the Saudis than the U.S. That said somewhere small and unimportant (from the Saudi perspective) might be leant on to take him.

The cynic in me wonders whether he insulted the Princes precisely so that his claim for asylum was not entirely based on his sexual orientation.

Tommy

September 13th, 2010

Other Fred,

That’s my take on it. Bush stacked the immigration courts with judges that would reject asylum claims of gay people for just about any reason, including fearing for their lives.

And yes, the Saudi ruling class are our enemies. They’ve been the main source of financing for global terrorism since at least the 80’s. Not to mention having one of the worst human rights records in modern history. Something every other government conveniently forgets.

If he isn’t given asylum here, hopefully someplace like Luxembourg will grant it.

Seraphiel

September 14th, 2010

Well, there’s not really any such thing as royalty. Nobody’s accident of birth makes them better than someone else, or warrants a greater punishment if they’re insulted. These notions of princes and kings need to be left in the dark ages.

Saudi Arabia is a land ruled by toxic anachronisms; nobody should be forced to go there, least of all someone who has a good chance of being murdered to satisfy some theocrat’s politically-motivated bloodlust.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1808: Australian Court Convicts Two Of "Most Disgusting and Abominable" Crime

Today In History, 1865: Dr. Barry's Death Reveals a Lifelong Secret

Today In History, 1985: Rock Hudson's AIDS Diagnosis Confirmed

Emphasis Mine

Born On This Day, 1844: Thomas Eakins

Born On This Day, 1879: J. Warren Kerrigan

Born On This Day, 1974: Gareth Thomas

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.