Box Turtle Bulletin

Box Turtle BulletinNews, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
“Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife…”
This article can be found at:
Latest Posts

Log Cabin takes up mantle of liaison to House

Timothy Kincaid

November 3rd, 2010

As the control of the House of Representatives shifts to Republicans, so too does the primary responsibility for lobbying the House leadership on matters of importance to the LGBT community shift to gay Republicans. And Log Cabin is cautiously optimistic that they have built bridges towards the leadership which could result in more movement on our issues than might otherwise be expected. (Washington Blade)

Although Democrats retained their control of the Senate, most political observers — including LGBT advocates — agree that major LGBT-related bills would have no chance of passing in Congress next year without the consent of Republican leaders like Boehner. And most observers believe House Republicans won’t allow gay bills to come to the House floor for a vote.

Cooper, however, said he and his Log Cabin team have a plan for persuading congressional Republican leaders to consider and agree to a vote on at least two gay bills. According to Cooper, one is an as yet to be unveiled tax reform bill that would address “tax inequities that affect the gay community.” The other is the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, or ENDA, which Democratic leaders declined to bring up for a vote during the past two years. The measure calls for banning employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Cooper said the tax bill would appeal to “the broader conservative community” while addressing inequities in the gay community.

Although I am not privy to information about the tax bill, I speculate that it would eliminate the tax on insurance premiums paid by companies to dependents of gay employees. This could be packaged as an undue burden on businesses as well as an unnecessary and punitive special tax.

Another area which Cooper may consider approaching the leadership could be on Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. This policy is universally unpopular with virtually every demographic in the country and would cost individual congressmen very little to support the repeal. Leadership could play both sides by allowing a free vote while opposing the change “during wartime” thus avoiding offending their “base” but allowing for future credit for the change.

I don’t know whether Cooper is basing this on realistic expectations or just blowing smoke. But the truth is (and I think we all know it) that the relationship between the gay community and the Democratic Party is at an all-time low. Exit polls show that not only did fewer gay people show up yesterday than two years ago, but they had much less party loyalty. (AmericaBlog)

Percent of gay voters who voted Democratic in House races:

2006 House races: 75%
2008 House races: 80%
2010 House races: 68%

And ironically, the Republican Party really has to do very little to do if it wants to further disillusion gay voters and add to the decay of this dependable Democratic voting bloc. President Obama’s lack of adequate communication with the community accompanied by what is perceived as either stalling or even tactical hostility on issue of DADT, DOMA and other legal battles has gays and lesbians doubtful about the Democratic Party depth of commitment to civil equality.

It is possible – though I think unlikely – that political calculations could lead Republican leadership to strategically concede on some issues of importance to our community based on the recognition that social change will force their hand eventually anyway Even backing off and not aggressively “fighting against the homosexual agenda” could leave some gay voters without any loyalty to Democrats or fear of Republicans and that could plausibly shift the vote by as much as 1% in some crucial races in 2012. (I am aware that this may be more wishful thinking than reality)

In any case, I wish Log Cabin well. They have a thankless job, and will receive from our community leaders all of the blame for anything harmful that the Republican Party does and no credit whatsoever for any success that they are able to achieve. But if they are able to bring about a vote on ENDA, they will indeed have my respect.

Comments

POST COMMENT | COMMENT RSS 2.0

John in the Bay Area
November 3rd, 2010 | LINK

There is no evidence that Republicans will vote to overturn Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. One of the only House Republicans to do so, Daou, lost his seat.

They aren’t fixing any tax inequities affecting gay families either. I doubt that the incoming Republicans would even agree to give this guy 5 minutes of their time to make his spiel.

Lucrece
November 3rd, 2010 | LINK

If the Democrats with such a wide margin in the House could not get a vote on ENDA, you can forget about it ever happening under a Republican majority.

The NE Republicans are hardly representative of the party.

You’re talking about the House Republicans who voted near unanimously against DADT repeal when it came up. If anything, the new brand of Republicans elected are even more conservative.

You can kiss anything happening for LGBT’s outside of the lame duck session goodbye.

Everything else will need to come from the courts until the Democrats gain supermajorities in the Senate and House again.

And no, barely 60 votes counting DINO’s from the Hicksville in the Senate was not a supermajority.

Tone
November 3rd, 2010 | LINK

If Barack Obama has feet of clay on LGBT issues, can anyone seriously think that the current complexion of the GOP will be any better? Ring Ring, “Who’s calling?” Reality, and she’s calling collect.

Sir Andrew
November 4th, 2010 | LINK

A small, friendly note, Tim: It’s ‘liaison’. The news editor in me wants to warn you that misspellings such as that cause people to mistrust your writing, even if only subconsciously.

Timothy Kincaid
November 4th, 2010 | LINK

Thanks Sir Andrew. Sadly, the post captions are not subject to spellcheck so while such an error would be detected in the body of the post, my naturally atrocious spelling catches me up.

Ryan
November 4th, 2010 | LINK

Obviously, there will never be pro-gay legislation or even gay recognition with a Republican controlled Congress. For every gay vote they might get, they would lose ten Christian votes. ENDA is gone, and DOMA is here to stay, at least for another 16 years. I’m none too optimistic about the Dems repealing DADT during the lame-duck session, either. But hopefully I’ll be proven wrong on that one.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.