GOP Names Focus Officer to Debate Committee

Jim Burroway

April 4th, 2011

Tom Minnery, director of Focus On the Family’s CitizenLink has been selected to serve on the GOP’s committee to determine what role the Republican National Committee will play in primary Presidential debates. Says Minnery:

They wanted someone who represents social conservatives, who is not a member of the (Republican National) Committee,” he said, “and that’s why they asked me.

“The party wants the candidate forums to be driven by party activists and grassroots representatives, and less by the national media that televise these events. The idea is that the party ought to be able to have some say over who poses questions to the candidates running for the party’s nomination for president.”

Kinda explains the GOP’s sudden shift back toward social issues, doesn’t it?

Lindoro Almaviva

April 4th, 2011

The RNC will always try to use Social Issues to bring the wedge (as exemplified in their attacks of Obama on Social issues, yet again). Apparently they have not understood that way too many people find the extreme far right and their antics distasteful.

At one point or another all those appeals to “the base” will render way too many Republican politicians unelectable.

At least seems the younger ones are seeing the writing on the wall.


April 5th, 2011

They have nothing else to run on.


April 5th, 2011

What do you mean, “…sudden shift BACK to social issues”?

Please show me one second of one day since 1980 that they WEREN’T focused on social issues.

Timothy Kincaid

April 5th, 2011


In the last election the party deliberately refused to run on social issues, focusing instead on taxes, the economy, and other non-social priorities. It worked rather well.

But what is going on at the RNC?

It’s like they said, “hey, that focus on economic issues and downplaying social issues got us votes… so now let’s do the opposite.”


April 5th, 2011

Voters are getting pissed that the GOP has NOT made any real progress with economic issues, but continued to play partisan politics to the point where nothing is getting done. Even their own supporters are losing steam. So switching back to scare politics is a sad but proven method to galvanize people who prefer emotion as a basis for decision making, because logic makes their heads hurt. I can only hope that the polls showing that a majority of Americans support marriage equality and other equality issues will translate to those people getting their complacent asses out of their chairs and voting to counteract the march to the polls that the wingnuts will orchestrate.

Seriously. IS there a way to make lack of equality sound as scary as the “loss of all things wholesome and American” that the haters promise will happen if anti-gay legislation is repealed? (when they aren’t threatening us with a Christian hell of fire and brimstone)

This makes me sad.

Timothy Kincaid

April 5th, 2011


Seriously. IS there a way to make lack of equality sound as scary as the “loss of all things wholesome and American” that the haters promise will happen if anti-gay legislation is repealed?

Yes, there is. And, seriously, it is already happening.

Have you noticed that NOM now has only two messages anymore?

1) I’m not a bigot. I’m really not. They’re calling me a bigot. See, they said I’m a bigot but I’m not. Mom, make the gays stop calling me a bigot!

2) And the black preachers all agree with me. So marriage is not a civil rights issue. It’s not. Look, here’s a black preacher to tell you. It’s not civil rights! It’s not!

Those both speak to the same thing. NOM knows (and fears) that when people get comfortable enough with an idea to actually look at it, “you can’t be treated like me because of who you are” sounds an awful lot like bias, animus, discrimination, and (though I don’t use the word much) bigotry.

They also know (and fear) that the young’ens already are past this issue and, furthermore, see it as shameful on the part of their parents.

And no one wants to be thought of as a bigot. Especially by their kids.

And let me just say that when you’re at a cocktail party in Los Angeles or New York, it may still be somewhat acceptable to be in favor of civil unions rather than marriage (though a bit suspect). But no one wants to be the guy saying, “well, they are sinners and its a choice.”

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.