US Olympic Committee goes anti-gay

Timothy Kincaid

April 29th, 2011

From OutSports

The U.S. Olympic Committee has named Peter Vidmar, a 1984 gold medalist in gymnastics, as its chief of mission for the 2012 U.S. Olympic team in London. In this job, Vidmar will be the liaison officer for the U.S. team in dealing with the International Olympic Committee and London organizers.

Vidmar, a Mormon, is an active opponent of gay marriage. In the 2008 fight for Proposition 8 in California, Vidmar donated $2,000 to pass the ballot initiative and also protested in public.

It is not likely that the Olympic Committee deliberately selected Vidmar to slight gay Americans. More likely, they simply don’t consider anti-gay activism to be a disqualifier for its representatives. Equality for gay people is – to the USOC – just “an opinion” over which reasonable people may differ.

In today’s highly competitive television market where a downtick of just a few percentage of viewers can cost the Olympics millions, and in which corporations (including those who fund the olympics) are supportive of gay equality and very hesitant to align with negative associations, this is a risky way to operate.

Michael van Atta

April 29th, 2011

The Olympic Committee has a well-established homophobic past. In the 1980s, the Committee selectively sued the Gay Olympics (now called the Gay Games) in order to prevent the homosexuals from using the word “olympics.” The premise of the suit was that use of the word sullied its meaning and, by extension, was damaging to the mainstream Olympics. Gay Olympics was the only party sued, even though word “olympics” appeared widely at that time–from Special Olympics to the Saturday morning cartoon “Laugh-Olympics” (which I believe was the one with the villain Snidely Whiplash). Unfortunately, the Olympic Committee won their suit, which is why the Gay Olympics became the Gay Games.


April 29th, 2011

Michael beat me to it.

The Olympic committee has never seemed to be bothered or punished for their long history of homophobia. I don’t see this latest development bothering too many people.

Timothy Kincaid

April 29th, 2011

One interesting side note:

The young attorney representing the USOC argued that it didn’t matter for what reason they wanted to restrict their name or from whom, it belonged to the US Olympic Committee and was theirs to do with, right or wrong.

In 1987, Ronald Reagan appointed that young attorney to the federal bench. His appointment was opposed by Nancy Pelosi due to his USOC work, as she felt it demonstrated an insensitivity to gay people. His bid failed.

However, in 1989 he was re-nominated by George HW Bush and received unanimous consent. He served in the Ninth Circuit as a judge until he recently retired, after ruling on the most controversial and high profile case of his career.

That attorney was Vaughn Walker, the judge that overturned Proposition 8.

Timothy Kincaid

April 29th, 2011

And while I understand the outrage about the denial of the use of Gay Olympics, it appears that there was a LONG history of denial of the use of the name, especially for international sports events.


April 29th, 2011

They didn’t go after the Special Olympics.

Timothy Kincaid

April 29th, 2011

yes, that is the one exception that they made.


April 29th, 2011

I’ve had the privilege of volunteering at SO events, and whatever the issues involving other groups (even one dear to my heart) using the term ‘olympic,’ I think the Special Olympics are unquestionably deserving of an exception, even if it’s the only one.

Gary Brewton

April 29th, 2011

The US Olympic Committee persecuted Gay Olympics founder Dr. Tom Waddell, trying to take his home: This is fag bashing; because it about went far beyond preserving the USOC sole right to use the Olympic name, into the realm of vindictiveness.


April 30th, 2011

I vaguely recall there were things named “Rodent Olympics” or something like that that the Gay Olympics entered as evidence. Apparently the OC did not mind its use for animals. Just by f*gs.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.