Tea Party Leader Will Exchange Debt Ceiling for Keeping Gays Out Of Military

Jim Burroway

May 10th, 2011

William Temple (Photo: Evan McMorris / TPM)

Tea Party Founding Fathers chairman William Temple addressed a news conference Monday morning warning lawmakers against raising the debt ceiling. Dressed in his trademark colonial garb, Temple warned that any lawmaker who voted for raising the debt ceiling would receive a zero on their scorecard when they rate candidates for 2012. But he was open to compromise:

On the list was keeping the front lines of America’s wars as free of openly gay people and women of any sexual leaning as possible. Temple said that “if the House Armed Services Committee and the Pentagon slow down on injecting open homosexuality and females into forward combat roles,” tea partiers might be able to put up with their new Republican House voting to ensure American government services are paid for with more borrowed cash.

Temple’s line of reasoning:

When the Pentagon’s own studies show that military effeminization may have an extremely costly impact on recruiting and retention, when Islamists have shown their willingness to sexually brutalize American female reporters, why would John Boehner’s House Republicans be caving to political correctness? Why would House Republicans who know better be fostering inappropriate attractions in the intimacy of tents, bunks, barracks, platoons, subs, tanks, convoys, cockpits, latrines, showers, toilets and locker rooms when we are fighting wars in three Muslim nations?

It’s a good thing the Tea Party is only interested in economic matters.

Lindoro Almaviva

May 10th, 2011

Like we have been sayinmg all along: Xenophobic,racist, homophobes in patriot drag

Rob in San Diego

May 10th, 2011

Gee I’m not sure if we should consider them the “fiscally conservative” party or the “we hate gays” party.

On a military note, since muslims execute gays, I can’t think of a better fighting force to exact revenge. The thought of gays killing muslims on the battlefield is kinda cool.


May 10th, 2011

First of all, I’ve never even heard of this guy, and to assume that because he says he is a “founding father” of the Tea Party means that he speaks for all those that support the small government movement is like saying that Perez Hilton speaks for the entire gay community. It’s ridiculous! Yes, there are bigots and idiots in every political/social activist group out there, but that does not mean that everyone in that group is a bigot or an idiot. There is a large portion of the Tea Party movement that is made up of Libertians as well as many Independents, Republicans & Democrats that have Libertarian leanings, so by lumping them all together as racists, bigots & homophobes, aren’t you really just guilty of doing what you claim this guy is doing? Aren’t you judging an entire group of people based on the behavior/beliefs/statements of a few?
I’m also curious to know if any of those that have responded or the author of the piece have actually ever been to a Tea Party event?

enough already

May 10th, 2011

There was a time, not even that long ago, when one could pretend that the Teaparty was all about small government, sane fiscal policy and that was it.

After the 2010 elections, all the Teaparty has done in every single venue over which they now have control was:
To do nothing about jobs.
To do nothing to heal the economy.
To do everything they could to attack women, gays, the transgender and children.

Show me a real democrat or a real libertarian (Ayn Rand for starters, even – or don’t you know what she firmly believed about fundamentalist Christians?= who is in this movement. Oh, but you can’t because the whole point of the Teaparty is to impose their christofascist program upon the country.

Priya Lynn

May 10th, 2011

Kristie said “the Tea Party movement that is made up of Libertians as well as many Independents, Republicans & Democrats“.

There, fixed it for you.


May 10th, 2011

Tea partiers need to go pound sand in a rat hole. With People like them running around loose this country is F***ed.


May 10th, 2011

Is that Kristie Palin or Kristie Bachman?


May 10th, 2011

When people take away other people’s right to freedom of expression, then you have to shut them down. If he gets media attention, then the way to deal with Temple is to stick a pie in his face, or eggs etc. No point having a debate with an idiot.

Patrick Hogan

May 10th, 2011

Inappropriate conduct going on inside tanks, convoys, cockpits and latrines? He’s either trolling or completely batshit…

I’ve been in more than a few cockpits, tanks and latrines in my life — tetris has nothing on the idea of having sex in any of them. As for convoys: I would think that the large number of other people would be rather prohibitive to intimacy…

Or maybe he’s just seen too many low budget porns. “Cockpits and Convoys” sounds like a porn…


May 10th, 2011

Kristie, there are many polls out there you can google. The numbers don’t lie: the vast majority of Tea Partiers vote Republican, are Christian conservatives, are anti-gay and anti-choice. Claiming otherwise is just dishonest. The “Tea Party” is just the GOP rebranded, poorly.


May 11th, 2011

Please humor me while I say “I told you so”.

I said all the while that Tea Partiers were campoaigning on Fiscal Issues that as soon as some of them got elected they would flip like a pancake onto Hating the Gays.

Prophecy fulfilled.


May 11th, 2011


Yes, Teabaggers are racists, bigots as a group. Yes, I have been to Tea Party (as they are now so politely called) rallies and they were scary, angry mobs of ignorant people spewing the stupidity fed them by their corporate masters and Fox News by racist bigots like Glen Beck and such astute economic advisers as Sarah Pallin.
As they say, you’re known by the company you keep.

PS. Are you a birther too?

Timothy Kincaid

May 11th, 2011

For those who would rather rain insult on Kristie than think about the matter, ya really ought to reconsider your motivation. Hate ain’t pretty, no matter who it comes from.

She is correct that many people are drawn to the Tea Party movement because of the reasons that it publicly espouses: fiscal conservatism. And that truly is the primary focus of their efforts.

A great deal of the attraction of the Tea Party, I believe, is that it is populist. Many Americans think that the Republican Party is ran by a CEOs and that the Democratic Party is controlled by special interest groups.

Neither party has proven to be particularly interested in what they see as happening to them. Within the memory of many members, “middle class” went from one working parent to both working, education is seen as failing, and the country’s status on economic, scientific, and cultural matters has slipped. They perceive that the Democrats care only about minorities and the Republicans have sidetracked them on social issues. They see the Tea Party as representing them, just good ol’ average Americans.

Unfortunately, “good ol’ average Americans” are also a demographic that isn’t particularly familiar with, informed about, or supportive of gay people (or minorities of any stripe).

So it is also true that although the Tea Party movement is primarily focused on fiscal issues, its members are generally not progressive on race, religion, sexual orientation or other social issues. We really shouldn’t be surprised that they hold anti-gay views.

But – and this is important – it’s not a bait and switch. They genuinely do want to focus on economic issues and while they are anti-gay, they are pissed off at politicians who have been trying to appeal to social issues while spending like a drunk sailor.

It isn’t that they aren’t anti-gay, rather that they are first fiscal conservative and then social conservative.

Temple’s statements above are traitorous to what the Tea Party folks have rallied around. He placed anti-gay advocacy higher than fiscal matters and gave debt raisers a pass if they were homophobic.

I’m certain that many a Tea Partier was screaming “No!!” This is exactly the same stuff the Republicans have been doing for decades.

Or, then again, maybe they are gullible and all nodded when he spoke.

Timothy Kincaid

May 11th, 2011

When people take away other people’s right to freedom of expression, then you have to shut them down.

Surely there is a special prize somewhere for this. The Irony Award, perhaps.



May 11th, 2011

Timothy, I’ll ask you the same question that Kristie asked. Have you ever been to a Tea Party meeting or rally? I’ve been to BOTH and I can assure you that the ones who are most visible and vocal fully deserve, and have earned, the “crazy” label that’s been given them. Are ALL of them anti-gay? Of course not, but it would be ridiculous to act as if most of them aren’t. Poll after poll have proven that. It’s like saying it’s wrong to claim that most fundamentalist Christians aren’t against gay civil equality. It may suck, but it doesn’t make it any less true.

Timothy Kincaid

May 11th, 2011


I don’t think that your comment addresses anything that I said. Perhaps you should read it again, as it seems to me that you may be responding to what you imagine is my opinion rather than what I actually wrote.


May 11th, 2011

It may very well be true that the “Tea Party” (actually just a faction of the Republican party) cares primarily about economic issues and secondarily about social issues. However, that’s a distinction without meaning. They’ll still vote against any and all gay rights issues, even if their primary objective is tax cuts for the rich.


May 12th, 2011

If Tea Partiers really cared only about fiscal conservatism without regard to social issues, they’d be Libertarians. When one chooses Tea Party instead, that tells me they care about both fiscal and social conservatism. No free pass from me just because some claim to only care about economic issues. Such a party already exists and they ignored it.


May 12th, 2011

My comment did address your post and I stand by it. You chastised people for the way they challenged Kristie, pulling out the “hate” card that you get bent out of shape when gay people use against anti-gay people. You also made the point that it is inappropriate to point out that Tea Partiers tend to be crazy. I pointed out that I have been to a meeting (accidentally) and to a rally (intentionally) and found them to very much live up to their billing.


May 12th, 2011

Why do these people have so much power? They do not represent the majority of Americans. They don’t even represent the majority of Republicans. So why is everybody so afraid of them?

Timothy Kincaid

May 12th, 2011


yep, I chastised people for attacking Kristie. But that’s all you got right.

I didn’t, for example, “make the point that it is inappropriate to point out that Tea Partiers tend to be crazy.”

And look at this whole thing:

Are ALL of them anti-gay? Of course not, but it would be ridiculous to act as if most of them aren’t. Poll after poll have proven that. It’s like saying it’s wrong to claim that most fundamentalist Christians aren’t against gay civil equality. It may suck, but it doesn’t make it any less true.

Ummmm…. what I said was

* its members are generally not progressive on … sexual orientation

* they hold anti-gay views

* It isn’t that they aren’t anti-gay

But I guess I didn’t say it quite enough.

So, Zeke, did your comment address mine? Well…. maybe not quite so very much.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.