NY GOP Marriage Supporter May Turn Democrat

Jim Burroway

June 28th, 2011

New York statesman and freshman state Senator Mark Grisanti ( (R-Erie and Niagara Co), who eloquently described why he supported that state’s marriage quality law even though he campaigned against in in 2010, is taking withering flack –his local hometown paper describes them as “withering body blows” –from conservatives and fellow members of the Republican party:

Grisanti fared no better with his own party as Erie County Republican Chairman Nicholas A. Langworthy made clear his disapproval that the senator went his own way on a key issue.

“For Mark to go back on his word that he gave to his constituents and to me — I am deeply disappointed,” Langworthy said.

… Langworthy and Erie County Conservative Chairman Ralph C. Lorigo were especially critical of his reneging on a promise to vote against the measure while campaigning last year.

“He informed me by text while he was on the floor,” Langworthy said of Grisanti’s Friday vote. “I urged him to stick by his word he had given. The people elected him on what he ran on. This is not tax policy or something. This is important stuff.”

Important stuff — more important to the GOP than the economy.

Got it.

Grisanti now says that he won’t rule out running for re-election as a Democrat, after rejecting the idea following his vote last Friday.


June 28th, 2011

He may be a statesman and a good guy on the marriage vote but he doesn’t seem to have a consistent and reliable moral compass. He seems to change positions every time the wind blows. Democrat? Republican? Pro-equality? Anti-Equality? Which way is the wind blowing?

David Roberts

June 28th, 2011

The acceleration of the debasement of the GOP is just incredible. I’m amazed that I was ever a member. There really is nothing left to redeem them.

Jim Burroway

June 29th, 2011

He doesn’t seem to have a consistent and reliable moral compass. He seems to change positions every time the wind blows.

I guess some people would rather others remain predictably and reliably rooted in ignorance rather than being allowed to become “wiser today than yesterday,” as he put it:

I’ve done the research, and I believe that a person can be wiser today than yesterday. I apologize to those who feel offended, to those I have hurt with the votes that I had six months ago. But I believe you can be wiser today than yesterday when you do the work.

Growth and change is what we celebrate everyone someone recognizes they were wrong. It utterly baffles me to no end to see people do what we want them to do — to change their mind — and condemn them for it.

There used to be a place in the GOP for people with conviction and moderate views — remember Lowell Weicker? Could Ronald Reagan even get elected in today’s Republican Party primaries? After all, he did raise taxes when he saw the deficit begin to spin out of control in 1983. In the bigger picture, maybe it’s the GOP being blown by the winds, not Grisanti.

Mark Cross

June 29th, 2011

Spellcheck headline…

David C.

June 29th, 2011

Diaz, a Democrat and stridently against marriage equality, could trade parties with Grisanti and it would be a wash. It would also better align both of them ideologically.


June 29th, 2011

Very snarky and insulting comment Jim. You know good and damned well that I wouldn’t “rather others remain predictably and reliably rooted in ignorance”. I’m reasonably concerned about if he has ANY kind of roots at all. That was my point. This flip-flopping of parties and willingness to sell his soul to the Republican platform to get elected and then, thankfully, reneging on his “unalterable” campaign promise, and then considering switching parties again to save his seat, doesn’t give me much faith that he’s a man of principles but rather a man of opportunity. I would say the same thing about any politician who such a record regardless of whether I agreed with their current position or not.

You may not see it quite the same way as I do but there’s no call to pull out an insulting straw man argument and attribute it to me. I fully support growth and change of heart and mind. I didn’t condemn that in any way. I questioned his commitment based on his history.


June 29th, 2011

And may I point out that, by his own words, he DIDN’T have a change of heart and mind. He made it clear that in his heart and mind he always knew that marriage equality was the right thing to do but it was POLITICAL CALCULATIONS that drove his vote. HE said that, not me. So, knowing that, it seems absurd for you to defend him as if his change of vote was based on a new found understanding of gay people or the Constitution rather than a new found understanding that his job is to make laws that support and protect Constitutional guarantees of justice and equality instead of protecting his political career.

And AGAIN, I salute him and appreciate his growth in that important realization. I just hope that he has really learned that lesson and that his future actions better demonstrate it than his past actions.


June 29th, 2011

Jim, thanks for covering this. Grisanti deserves our ongoing support. It’s not a one-shot deal. Our opponents can bring a lot of social pressure on people, still, and be petty.

The worst thing that could happen to him is to “flop” back.


June 29th, 2011

Regardless of his flips or flops we have no choice really but to support his re-election; whichever party he runs under. It’s crucial that we get the marriage supporters re-elected; PARTICULARLY the Republicans, in order to show the state of New York and politicians in the other 49 states that voting for equality is a winning proposition and to show that our side is a greater force to reckon with than NOM, the Catholic and Mormon Churches and other anti-gay organizations. If NOM is successful in defeating the 4 pro-equality Republicans it will be devastating to our cause nationally.

Priya Lynn

June 29th, 2011

Tampazeke said “He may be a statesman and a good guy on the marriage vote but he doesn’t seem to have a consistent and reliable moral compass. He seems to change positions every time the wind blows.”.

Doing that was much more moral than remaining an anti-gay Republican would have been.

I’m with Jim, if you didn’t want him to “remain predictably and reliably rooted in ignorance” then it was pointless to criticize his flipflopping.


June 29th, 2011

I concur. We gays sometimes do not have the back of our supporters. I still lament how 4 Supreme Court justices in IA were voted out of office. NOM was exacting revenge. We had our sights on other goals. Let’s make sure that does not happen again.


June 29th, 2011

Gay marriage has been a very hard sell west of the Hudson Valley. Buffalo is in a culturally different part of the country from Albany and NYC.

If Grisanti gets defeated, chances are the winner would be the previous state Senator, Antoine Thompson. Who previously voted for gay marriage legalization. And arguably paid the price for it while everyone’s in a big hurry to reward Grisanti.

Timothy Kincaid

June 29th, 2011

He made it clear that in his heart and mind he always knew that marriage equality was the right thing to do but it was POLITICAL CALCULATIONS that drove his vote. HE said that, not me.

Zeke, you have your politicians confused. Grisanti did the research and changed his position accordingly. I think you are perhaps thinking of Kruger.


June 29th, 2011

I hope he follows his heart and leaves the BIGOT party in the trash where it belongs.


June 29th, 2011

Timothy, I understand that Kruger and Asanti said similar things but Grisanti said, in an interview with WGRZ explaining his vote, “I would say three years ago, it was probably, with that letter and how strong it was, was probably more political than actually conscience.”

So I believe my previous comment was accurate.

And thanks for bringing up Kruger. If Jim is going to heap praise on Asanti and accuse me of not graciously accepting a change of position, then why did he write the post putting down Kruger instead of simply praising him as well. Instead he complained that one was a statesman and the other was a politician. I content that they are BOTH politicians. And in SPITE of that I’m thankful for both of their votes. And as I said in another post, I believe that we MUST support Grisanti in his re-election bid no matter what party he runs under.

Priya, if you had read my post you would have been aware that I supported his flipping. I’m just concerned that, with his record, if the wind changes he may flop again.


June 29th, 2011

“Asanti” should be “Alesi”

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts


Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.