Pawlenty caves to NOM pressure

Timothy Kincaid

August 5th, 2011

After a day in which the National Organization for Marriage, an adjunct of the Roman Catholic Church, pressured former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty by bitching about him to various media and encouraging the people on its email list to call him, Pawlenty caved. (Politico)

“After reviewing the pledge, the governor wanted to sign it and we sent it to them this morning,” said Pawlenty spokesman Alex Conant.

Because, of course Pawlenty wanted to pledge his fealty to a special interest group that is shrinking in size and influence and to announce that he, too, would appoint puppet judges to the federal bench so as to allow the executive branch to dictate the outcome of legislation.

Klassy.

Sir Andrew

August 5th, 2011

Catholic Church? Really?? I thought they were essentially an adjunct of the Mormon church.

Timothy Kincaid

August 5th, 2011

Sir Andrew,

The Mormons have backed WAY off since California. You’d think that they’ve never heard of Prop 8 from the way they’ve been lately.

No, NOM is strongly tied to the Catholic Church. Brian, Maggie and most of the staff are Catholic and what little we know about their funding (and we know VERY little) has all been Catholic groups like Knights of Columbus. Frankly, I suspect that they are almost entirely funded by the church itself (or, alternately, a small number of very wealthy catholic individuals) and that is the reason behind all the violations of voter protection laws. Even their arguments have reverted to Catholic theology such as Natural Law.

Nick Thiwerspoon

August 5th, 2011

Lets’ not call them NOM, since they really have nothing to do with marriage. Let’s call the OAGR (Organisation Against Gay Rights).

Nick Thiwerspoon

August 5th, 2011

That’s “Let’s”. Sorry. Dyslexia.

Timothy Kincaid

August 5th, 2011

Cute acronym, Nick, but I’ve found that people take my opinion more seriously when it gives our enemies the courtesy of their own name and doesn’t try to express contempt of them personally.

That’s one reason that we discourage terms like “ReTHUGlican” or commenting on Maggie Gallagher’s weight. Not only is it discourteous, it distracts from our criticism of their policies.

The answer to their puppet-judge pledge is not, “yeah, but you’re fat” or to give them a pejorative nickname. And if it does become our answer, then not only will it turn off people we could persuade, but it lets us know that we have no winning argument.

(Though, of course, The Peter is an exception. It doesn’t alienate a single person on the planet to mock LaBabs.)

Nick Thiwerspoon

August 5th, 2011

Yeah, good point. The problem is that they say they “support marriage”. And by accepting their term for themselves (“National Organization for MARRIAGE) we strengthen them. I did a blog piece on this a month or so ago:

http://nikolaos-thiwerspoon.blogspot.com/2011/06/nom-oagr.html

I thought it relatively intemperate, but those I consulted said I hadn’t been rude enough!!!

Ben in Atlanta

August 6th, 2011

I clicked on the links but I still see no connection to the “National Organization for Women” tag before “Tim Pawlenty”. What am I missing? Since CBN would probably rather keep women barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen, what does that have to do with NOW.

Sick him ladies.

Priya Lynn

August 6th, 2011

I agree Nick, never accept the National Organization “For” “Marriage”‘s dishonest name as it is, always specify that they are not for marriage, they are against it.

Cowboy

August 6th, 2011

There are some Mormon connections at NOM. I wouldn’t doubt Romney was feeling some pressure from high-placed Mormons in NOM ranks.

Though Orson Scott Card isn’t one of them. I can’t imagine Romney being influenced by some science-fiction writer.

Just who has the power to make NOM open its books? Certainly not the courts. Maybe a investigative team from 60 Minutes?

tristram

August 6th, 2011

“Pawlenty caves to NOM pressure”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6_1Pw1xm9U

Paul J. Stein

August 6th, 2011

Looks like a “SideShow” GOP convention. Freaks of nature, snake oil,charlatins, scam artists. A “REAL” conservative oldtime REPUBLICAN could walk away with the nomination. Can not wait to see and hear the drama.

BlackDog

August 6th, 2011

The problem is that since the Rednecks, the Religious Right, and (through media outlets like Fox News) a few very wealthy individuals have all taken over the Republican party…most of those old school conservative old time Republicans either are…or are closer to being…Democrats now.

When Mike Huckabee said he didn’t think HE could make it in the current political environment on the Republican side I knew they were in trouble.

JimInMa

August 6th, 2011

adjunct of the Moron church, more like.
Which includes both Mormon *and* Roman

Qwerty

August 8th, 2011

Interesting fact from recent New York legislation: New York was the very last state in the country to legalize no-fault divorce. This was late in 2010.

No-fault divorce makes divorce much easier and way less expensive to obtain.

Funny thing, though. I didn’t see NOM parading through Manhattan or in Albany crusading against this particular piece of legislation. I guess divorce is not a priority for NOM, despite Brown’s oft-repeated “Maggie is out there fighting against divorce all the time…”.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1964: "Homosexuality In America"

Today In History, 1965: Gay Rights Advocates Picket the Civil Service Commission

Today In History, 2003: U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Nation's Sodomy Laws

Today In History, 2013: U.S. Supreme Court Declares Defense of Marriage Act Unconstitutional

Today In History, 2013: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Appeal of California's Prop 8

Today In History, 2015: U.S. Supreme Court Legalizes Marriage Equality Nationwide

Born On This Day, 1951: Lance Loud

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.