NC Senate Rushes To Enshrine Marriage Ban In State Constitution

Jim Burroway

September 13th, 2011

Reflecting the horrendous crisis which must be enveloping the state, the North Carolina Senate rushed through a proposed constitutional amendment to make same-sex marriage even more illegaler, barely twenty-four hours after the previously unseen bill made its debut in the lower house. The bill passed both houses with the required two-thirds three-fifths majority without public notice, debate or input.

State law already bans same-sex marriage, and the 30-16 vote in the Senate, voters will decide to enshrine discrimination in the state’s constitution, along with a wider constitutional ban on civil unions and domestic partnerships. The vote will take place during next May’s primary election. With a hotly contested GOP presidential primary and an uncontested Democratic field, the election will likely boost turnout for the amendment’s supporters, while also give an edge to social conservatives in the GOP primary.


September 13th, 2011

Is there a way to hurry the courts to finally put an end to all these discriminatory laws?


September 13th, 2011

If it’s already illegal in NC, what the fuck is the point of making it even more so?

What’s with the pissing contest to see who can make same sex marriage the most illegalest??

Doesn’t make much sense to me.


September 14th, 2011

We’re talking NORTH CAROLINA, for goodness’ sake. But I’ll refrain from posting the Gomer Pyle YouTube link of which I’m so fond.


September 14th, 2011

Um, how did it pass with two-thirds majority in the Senate when it passed 30-16?

Jim Burroway

September 14th, 2011

Sorry, that should have read three-fifths.


September 14th, 2011

With NC Unemployment at 10% Tea-Republicans work feverishly on opressing minorities RATHER THAN on Jobs creation?

The REAL test for North Carolina Economically will now lie with the people and just how they vote on this initiative.

Here is a nice list of NC Manufacturers to support or refrain from supporting depending on how this all resolves – *file for future reference


September 14th, 2011

“The vote will take place during next May’s primary election.”

Ouch. I did not know that. That absolutely means this will pass. With demographic changes in NC and with the amendment having been drafted very broadly to ban all domestic unions and with a favorable poll from PPP, I thought that it might be possible, if unlikely, that we could pull an upset. But if it is on a primary day, forget it. Write it off and save the money for ME and NC.

It is really appalling that it is permissible to amend the state constitution with a vote on a primary election day, when only a tiny fraction of the electorate will vote. So much for “let the people vote!”

The only positive thing about this development here is that we see the continuation of a pattern. The NC GOP concealed the vote as long as possible and disposed of the issue w/in 24 hourse and without any supportive speeches. In MN, the GOP passed the amendment during a night session with no speakers in support, and quickly left the building through a rear exit. In NY in 2009 and 2011, no GOP members of the senate or assembly spoke against gay marriage. This is not the way you behave if you are on the righteous side or the winning side.

Richard Rush

September 14th, 2011

customartist said, “With NC Unemployment at 10% Tea-Republicans work feverishly on oppressing minorities RATHER THAN on Jobs creation?”

I suspect they do view this as jobs creation legislation – in the sense that God will bless them with jobs for bashing the gays. Lots of people really are that stupid.


September 17th, 2011

If it’s already illegal in NC, what the fuck is the point of making it even more so?

Normal statutes can be repealed by the state legislature and governor. A state constitutional amendment has to be repealed via both the state legislature and a popular referendum.

Having a ban in the form of a state constitutional amendment is also kinda worth a little more in federal lawsuits especially at the US Supreme Court.

It’s also just the Religious Right being asshats. It might take five more years to repeal or get overturn of a SCA than a simple statute.

When looking at these things I remember William Sherman describing Southern state legislatures to Lincoln as utterly compliant to the planter class and otherwise a form of local entertainment.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.