NOM Loses Control Of Web Presence

Jim Burroway

April 11th, 2012

The National Organization for Marriage is having a rough day. Their blog is down, their Facebook site had been hacked, and someone else has control of NOM’s Twitter feed NOMTweets:It looks like NOM has their Facebook page back, and their “apology” for stifling comments in their web sites and their racially divisive strategy is gone. But NOMTweets is still going rogue.

Update: NOM’s Brian Brown vows to crush the rebellion:

SteveInMI

April 11th, 2012

I’m sure I’m not the first to notice Brian Brown’s sloppy reference to Darth Vader from the original Star Wars film (if it really is Brian Brown at this point…)

Vader: I find your lack of faith disturbing.

Tarkin: Enough of this. Vader, release him!

Vader: As you wish. [drops his hand and Motti’s head hits the table as he regains his breath]

Tarkin: This bickering is pointless. Lord Vader will provide us with the location of the Rebel fortress by the time this station is operational. We will then crush the Rebellion with one swift strike.

David in Houston

April 11th, 2012

Wow… they have a massive 108 followers on Twitter. So that means that 0.0000003466% of the public supports them. Very impressive!

Johnny Q. Doe

April 11th, 2012

@David

Those 108 followers are all new since the hijack.

Whomever hijacked the site changed the Twitter account to @NOM4EQuality (Queery has a screenshot), thus freeing @NOMTweets as a screenname. Someone quickly grabbed that username, so all the followers are new. The original account has been deleted or suspended. Either by Twitter or by the hijacker (perhaps to destroy the follower-link to the established account). NOM’s original followers were approximately 5k on Twitter as you can see on the screenshot mentioned).

Richard Rush

April 11th, 2012

B.S. Brown: “A mutiny is underway. We will end the rebellion with one quick stroke.”

Spoken like a classic despot. B.S. and NOM are perfect together.

Priya Lynn

April 11th, 2012

Sounds like the National Organization Against Marriage is even losing the support of their own employees. You know your movement is in trouble when you can’t even keep your employees on board.

Wendy Leigh

April 11th, 2012

“One quick stroke” eh? Would that be a “long stroke” Brian???

Ryan

April 11th, 2012

Brown must be hacked, too. Most people don’t cast themselves in the Darth Vader role. This is a highly amusing morning!

Snowman

April 11th, 2012

Either that, or he’s so out of touch that he hasn’t seen the Star Wars movies.

Samiimas

April 11th, 2012

It’d be epic if this turns out to be the work of one of their employees.

Perhaps they made the mistake of outsourcing the control and maintenance of their websites and such to a third party who doesn’t share their bigotry and who could no longer stomach helping them, regardless of the paycheck?

Priya Lynn

April 11th, 2012

Samiimas, from Brian Brown’s comment I take it that this is the work of more than one of the National Organization Against Marriage’s employees. It appears they finally couldn’t take the dishonesty and sleazyness of their organization’s approach even if they opposed marriage equality.

Patrick

April 11th, 2012

It’s obvious why they’re worried: the leak of the IRS forms wasn’t a criminal act by the HRC as they claimed, it was internal dissent.

Ben In Oakland

April 11th, 2012

If it worked for Louis Marinelli, maybe some other people working there finally have seen the light.

homer

April 11th, 2012

Given Brian Brown’s nasty personality, I can imagine working for him is no fun. Wouldn’t surprise me if someone decided to get revenge.

Tone

April 11th, 2012

[This comment has been removed for violating our comments policy — JB]

TomTallis

April 12th, 2012

I think that his use of the word “mutiny” strongly suggests that this was an inside job…

Matt

April 12th, 2012

Channeling a tinpot despot- how appropriate.

Matt

April 12th, 2012

And when/if he catches the person(s) responsible, can we expect a “You have failed me for the last time” tweet?

Boo

April 14th, 2012

Are you sure Brown’s tweet isn’t the result of another hack?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.