6 responses

  1. Dante
    May 19, 2012

    “whether as an early victim of sex abuse (Paul Cameron)” and “that Cameron believes that large numbers of gays are sex abusers, ”

    makes sense in light of

    “Some types of offenders, such as those who sexually offend against young boys, have still higher rates of child sexual abuse in their histories (Becker and Murphy, 1998).”

  2. Eric in Oakland
    May 20, 2012

    “You can go all the way up to the current Pope’s absurd obsession with the subject.”

    What is he suggesting?

  3. Tara TASW
    May 20, 2012

    Socarides was a piece of work. Although his theories usually attributed male homosexuality to bad fathers, in his own son’s particular case, he blamed it on Richard’s mother.

  4. Timothy (TRiG)
    May 21, 2012

    “You can go all the way up to the current Pope’s absurd obsession with the subject.”

    What is he suggesting?

    The Pope Is Not Gay

  5. Mark F.
    May 22, 2012

    What hasn’t been suggested a “cause” of homosexuality? They can always find something.

  6. Timothy Kincaid
    May 22, 2012

    I’m still holding on to the hypothesis that homosexuality is the direct result of Gerber’s Strained Peas. And as no one, no one at all, has ever even attempted to refute this hypothesis, it proves that I am right and that they are all afraid to face the TRUTH.

    And that’s pretty much the same views that everyone on the anti-gay express thinks about their own pet “cause”.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Back to top
mobile desktop