Maggie’s Freudian slip

Timothy Kincaid

November 7th, 2012

Writing in National Review Online, the National Organization for Marriage’s Maggie Gallagher opined with her observations about what drove last night’s election results:

The Obama electorate defeated marriage. I’m guessing we lose at least three of tonight’s four races, and maybe four of the four. We were outspent eight-to-one — and no one was willing to speak for marriage, while the whole Democratic establishment and Hollywood campaigned for marriage. Last night really is a big loss, no way to spin it.

Catch it?

“…the whole Democratic establishment and Hollywood campaigned for marriage.”

Not “campaigned against traditional marriage”, not “campaigned for articifical marriage”. No, Maggie got it right.

The Democratic establishment and Hollywood (and a whole lot of others) campaigned FOR MARRIAGE, for the integrity and dignity of a treasured institution that it not be sullied by exclusion or animus or smug superiority.

(oh, and someone slip Brian Brown a note about spinning)

Bose in St. Peter MN

November 7th, 2012


“…no one was willing to speak for marriage…”

is the phrase jumped out at me, too.

What does this really mean to her? That all of NOM’s archbishop buddies nobodies who didn’t speak up enough? Or that the Catholic Church in Maine didn’t reinlist in 2012 like 2009? Not enough black pastors took the bait in Maryland?

I’m honestly curious — who didn’t speak up despite Maggie’s hopes and expectations?

Lindoro Almaviva

November 7th, 2012

oh, and someone slip Brian Brown a note about spinning

And a box of Kleenex.


November 7th, 2012

Haha, good one, thanks for pointing that out, I missed it first time I read her comments on another blog.

David Roberts

November 7th, 2012

I suspect she simply left out “gay” as in “gay marriage” but who knows. She is a bizarre individual — even Freud would be challenged.


November 8th, 2012

Well, she did describe BOTH sides as “for marriage,” which is really getting it right for once. An understandable error, considering how distraught she probably is at the unignorable reminder that she will someday soon have to find a new line of work.


November 8th, 2012

Great Catch. I didn’t see that mentioned in the NR comments section even.

I thought the most interesting part was her note about the lack of support the issue gets from conservatives. The only people who campaign on this issue any more are religious leaders from conservative denominations. Big business and small government types have all lined up on the pro-SSM side.

She has written alot about her side’s hidden “common sense” support. These actually losses must be making her re-think that.

Priya Lynn

November 8th, 2012

Hyhybt said “Well, she did describe BOTH sides as “for marriage,” which is really getting it right for once.”.

No, that’s not right. Maggie doesn’t do any advocating for heterosexual marriage, her activities are solely about preventing gay marriage. Maggie is not for marriage, she is against (same sex) marriage.


November 8th, 2012

I caught that too! It was a fleeting moment of truth for ole Maggie!


November 9th, 2012

The thing Maggie and Brian seem to have missed is that with all of the Bigots and Archbigots and close-minded preachers who railed against allowing same sex couples to have access to civil marriage the folks in the pews turned a deaf ear.

A couple of weeks ago someone wrote a comment predicting doom for the gay marriage measures on the ballots. I think it was in response to the President’s promoting it. Nate Silver is not likely to offer him a position on the staff of five-thirty eight.

If no one has mentioned it, the fourth justice on the Iowa Supreme Court was up for a retention vote. He too won with a comfortable majority. The Dems held the Iowa senate so no ballot measure is possible before 2018.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.