November 27th, 2012
Ugandan LGBT advcoate Kasha Jacqueline posted this helpful tutorial on her Facebook page. I took the liberty of changing the bullets to numbers so we can identify the stage where the Anti-Homosexuality Bill currently stands, which appears to be at B.5, in which the committee is preparing its final report for the full House.
THE PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
The Process of the Bill in Parliament
How a Bill becomes Law
1. PRIVATE MEMBER’S BILL. Article 79(1) of the constitutional provides that “parliament shall have the power to make the Laws on any matter for the peace, order, development and good governance of Uganda”. A bill is a draft of an Act of parliament and includes both a private member’s Bill and a Government Bill. A private member’s Bill is moved by a backbench MP.
- MP. Committee chairperson moves motion seeking leave (permission) to present private member’s Bill.
- Provides proposed draft of the Bill.
- MPs debate and vote on motion.
- If the MPs reject the motion; the private member’s Bill is dropped.
- If the motion is approved: printing and publication of the Bill is done by clerk to parliament.
- Bill is published in the Gazette
- Private member’s Bill is introduced for the first reading accompanied by certificate of financial implication.
- Speakers refer Bill to appropriate committee.
- Committee scrutinizes Bill
- Calls responsible mover(s)
- Calls various stakeholders and government in public hearings
- Reviews relevant and related laws/documents
- Writes report with proposed amendments to plenary
NOTE: The committee can only propose amendments and changes to the bill. It cannot make those changes directly. Those changes can only be made through the following steps:
- Mover moves and justifies motion for second Reading of the Bill
- Committee chairperson presents report on the Bill
- Minority Report is presented (if it exists )
- MPs debate committee report on principles of the Bill
- Parliament votes for second Reading of the Bill
- Bill referred to the committee of the whole house
D. Committee of the Whole House
- Committee of the whole house means a committee composed of the whole body MPs.
- Chaired by the speaker /deputy speaker (referred to as chairperson)
- Sits in the chamber.
- Speakers leaves the chair, sits at the clerk’s Table
- MPs approve causes, and schedules of the Bill.
- MP in charge of Bill asks plenary to resume
- Reports outcome of committee of the whole house
- Plenary votes for Third Reading of the Bill
F. Clerk’s office
- Clerk’s office prepares copies for authentication and Assent of the president.
- Copy sent to the president.
G. Presidents office
- President assents to Act of parliament*
- Act of parliament becomes Law of Uganda
- Implementation starts on commencement date
- Law is published in government Gazette
*president may reject to give assent
Constitution provides that the president shall within 30 days after a bill is presented to him/her either:-
- Assent to the bill
- Return the bill to parliament with a request that the bill or a particular provision of it be reconsidered by parliament; or
- Notify the speaker in writing about the decision
The bill may be reconsidered and then presented for the president’s approval. However it may become law without the president’s assent if he/she returns it to parliament two times. It should have the support of at least two-thirds of all MPs.
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.