Thomas Peters Update

Rob Tisinai

March 22nd, 2013

I’m trying to come up with some sort of pun using the term “facts evasion.” Because, you know, it sounds a bit like “tax evasion,” right? Right? No?

Anyway.

After posting my conversation with NOM’s Communications Director Thomas Peters yesterday, I alerted him to its existence:

In response, he blocked me.

That’s probably the sensible move for him, on a number of levels. But it does nothing to change my judgment that Thomas’ primary strategy for dealing with inconvenient reality is simply to ignore it. Once again, it seems NOM is guilty of facts evasion.

No? Still no? Really?

I might need some help with that one.

StraightGrandmother

March 22nd, 2013

LOL! He can block you all he wants, that is the first sign of tyranny suppression of speech.

Doesn’t matter, I have faith that the Regnerus Paper will be RETRACTED.

Hunter

March 22nd, 2013

If you’ve ever seen any videos of those (admittedly rare) occasions when Tony Perkins has been challenged on one of his false assertions, the reaction is the same: try to ignore it, and if that doesn’t work, change the subject.

Dave H

March 22nd, 2013

I like “facts evasion.”

You could also say that people from these various wingnut organizations are living on a “fact-free diet.”

Bill T.

March 22nd, 2013

The average NOMnut is not known for its truthiness.

Priya Lynn

March 22nd, 2013

I think “facts evasion” works well, even sounds similar to “tax evasion”.

Richard Rush

March 22nd, 2013

True story:

About nine months ago I was approaching a deadline for providing some information to a state government office. I faxed it, and they said they didn’t receive it. Same thing the second time. Then, as they say, the third time is the charm.

I called it Fax Evasion.

Jamie O'Neill

March 22nd, 2013

Remember when the NOM crowd were saying, Just because we post something doesn’t mean we agree with it? That’s a kind of fact loophole.

DN

March 23rd, 2013

SGM, as much as I agree with you basically all the time, it’s not a violation of freedom of speech until an agent of the government shuts down speech. Just a friendly reminder :)

Regan DuCasse

March 24th, 2013

On their websites and FB pages NOM, FRC, ILI…We Can Defend Marriage…ALL their cohorts.
They will delete and block and ban most dissenting views, facts and information. They call it ‘troll banning’. Even after I put out some pleas and assurances about respectful interaction and deletions and bans and what about free speech, no sale.
Any forums THEY can control, rank hypocrisy will prevail.
I can say in all honesty and generalize that these are people who truly can’t think intelligently, nor spontaneously and don’t WANT to be informed about what’s going on in the real world. So “facts evasion” is an EXCELLENT way of putting their behavior.
It’s not hard to call them out. Not just on how stupid they are, but on how arrogant. They, after all, use the Bible and religious belief as a substitute for actual character and intelligence. None of which is their own original thought. They are using quotes after all. THEY didn’t write any of it.
But they put themselves up as if such deep thinkers and morally more thoughtful and capable than the rest of us mere mortals.
Until you do nail them on question that’s actually very simple, and a person of good character and decency would know in a second.
And they choose to not answer, they ignore it. And then they delete the question.
Only proving they aren’t what THEY think they are.
We all know how often we get accused of hating God, Christians and Christianity…just by challenging these people on their arrogance and phoniness and lying.
In truth, we know GOOD Christians when we see them.
And THAT is what they don’t want anyone else to find out.

And these are the people who think they deserve to be in control of other people’s lives?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Vermont Bans Conversion Therapy

Report: ISIS Stones Teen For Allegedly Being Gay

CA Police Warn Of Carjackers Using Grindr To Lure Victims

First Same-Sex Couples Are Marrying In Colombia

OK Lawmakers Make Last-Minute Effort Move Anti-Trans Bathroom Bill

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1895: Oscar Wilde Convicted of "Gross Indecency"

Today In History, 1913: The Redl Affair

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.