Republican Leadership: no more marriage fighting in Washington

Timothy Kincaid

June 26th, 2013

While many grass-roots conservatives will rally the troops and, well, send out fund-raising letters, the national Republican leadership seems intent on packing up the marriage issue and shipping it out of the Capital. (Politico)

House Speaker John Boehner, whose leadership spent millions to defend DOMA, said he was “disappointed” in the decision, but did not promise action in the Republican House.

“While I am obviously disappointed in the ruling, it is always critical that we protect our system of checks and balances,” Boehner said in a statement. “A robust national debate over marriage will continue in the public square, and it is my hope that states will define marriage as the union between one man and one woman.”

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican, said he’s “disappointed in this decision, and the marriage debate will continue in the states”

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the No 2. Senate Republican, said “like it or not, the Supreme Court is the final word on constitutional matters.”

“It sounds to me that that battle will be moving to the states,” Cornyn said. “The issue is not going away and there are going to be havens of traditional values like Texas where I don’t think the law is going to be changed.”

Why yes, campaign donor and right wing grassroots activist, they support your effort to go against the nation’s growing consensus. Just somewhere else. Now move along while they do something that won’t hurt their reelection abilities.

Read more:

occono

June 26th, 2013

But there’s now the question of the rights of those married in one state but residing in a non-recognizing one.

Gene in L.A.

June 26th, 2013

Yes, what Occono said. I see email after Facebook post after blog, all saying “DOMA has been found unconstitutional.” Not so. SECTION 3 of DOMA has been found so. Section 2 still allows states to deny recognition of same-sex marriages legal in other states. While this is clearly unconstitutional on its face, it hasn’t been invalidated yet. Until it is, our marriages are still second-class.

MattNYC

June 26th, 2013

“there are going to be havens of traditional values like Texas”

if by “traditional values” you mean the values of the 1300s.

Ben In Oakland

June 26th, 2013

about those million you spent defending DOMa, Mr. speaker?

Will

June 26th, 2013

“Their re-election abilities” . . . too funny — WHAT re-election abilities? They’ve rendered themselves irrelevant.

Steve

June 26th, 2013

@occono
That’s settled law really. Aside from a few exceptions like Social Security and VA benefits that may trigger a lawsuit, what counts for federal benefits is usually the state of celebration.

Even without Section 2 states have always been free to ignore laws from other states. Which is why that part hasn’t been challenged yet. It’s messed up and no way to run a modern country, but it’s how it has been for a long time.

Hyhybt

June 26th, 2013

Why does their speaking so rationally just make me think they’re up to something?

occono

June 26th, 2013

Steve: Yeah it’s the laws that are based on residence or are ambiguous I mean.

Some rights are explicitly based on if you are married in a state, some are explicitly based on if you are married in YOUR state, and some don’t say either way.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwyHNoblIr47VmlEMXE1a3BlOXc/edit

I’m saying I’d be surprised if they’re saying they’re not going to try to legislate to make the ambiguous federal rights depend on your residence, just for the sake of it.

occono

June 26th, 2013

And yeah section 2 is a waste of time to challenge. People should go directly challenge the marriage bans themselves, aim to eventually get a Loving-style ruling (eventually).

Jim Hlavac

June 26th, 2013

Does Cornyn he know that the mayor of Houston is gay? In a long term relationship? Egad.

Lord_Byron

June 26th, 2013

Texas is going to be a purple state by 2016 so let’s see how long “traditional values” are enforced in Texas.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.