Peru legislature votes not to protect gays from hate crimes.

Timothy Kincaid

July 5th, 2013

El Pais

El congresista Carlos Bruce propuso en 2011 una modificación al Código Penal para que las agresiones por discriminación de orientación sexual y la identidad de género fueran castigadas con penas agravadas. El proyecto de ley estuvo en la Comisión de Justicia del Legislativo hasta hace un mes, cuando se descartó para evitar el ruido de los lobbies religiosos.

Sin embargo, la noche del jueves el Congreso votó la cuestión: 56 parlamentarios se pronunciaron en contra, entre ellos 26 del oficialista Gana Perú y 16 fujimoristas. “No pensé que la resistencia a este grupo social era tan grande. Es una muestra clara de la homofobia que existe en el Congreso, una homofobia escondida, porque ganamos el debate pero perdimos la votación”, ha declarado Bruce este viernes a EL PAÍS. Durante el debate, dos parlamentarios de confesión evangélica – uno de ellos fujimorista, Julio Rosas – fueron los más reticentes. “No había congresistas que abiertamente expresaron su discrepancia. Salvo dos evangélicos con argumentos débiles, todos los otros se pronunciaban a favor. Pero había una mayoría silenciosa que al momento de la votación se expresó (en contra), en particular la bancada de Gana Perú”, añadió Bruce.

Google Translate:

Congressman Carlos Bruce proposed in 2011 an amendment to the Criminal Code so that the assaults of discrimination sexual orientation and gender identity were punished with severe penalties. The bill was in the Legislative Judiciary Committee until a month ago, when it was discarded to avoid the noise of the religious lobbies.

However, on Thursday night Congress passed the question: 56 MPs voted against, including 26 of the ruling Gana Peru and 16 Fujimori. “I never thought that resistance to this social group was so large. It is a clear example of the homophobia that exists in Congress, hidden homophobia, because we won the debate but lost the vote, “Bruce said Friday at HOME. During the debate, two MPs of evangelical confession – one of them Fujimori, Julio Rosas – were the most reluctant. “There was Congress who openly dissented. Except for two evangelical weak arguments, all others were in favor. But there was a silent majority that when the vote was expressed (against), including the bed of Gana Peru “added Bruce.

Mark F.

July 5th, 2013

How is adding an extra penalty to a crime because of motivation “protecting” people? I am assuming that assault and murder is still illegal in Peru, isn’t it? I find these laws ridiculous and offensive. Why is it worse if someone beats up another person because he is gay as opposed to just randomly beating up someone for the fun of it?

Secret Advocate

July 5th, 2013

As the Supreme Court said in Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476, 487-88 (1993), enhanced penalties for bias-motivated crimes are permissible “because this conduct is thought to inflict greater individual and societal harm.”

The legislature can rationally find that “bias-motivated crimes are more likely to provoke retaliatory crimes, inflict distinct emotional harms on their victims, and incite community unrest. . . . The State’s desire to redress these perceived harms provides an adequate explanation for its penalty-enhancement provision over and above mere disagreement with offenders’ beliefs or biases. As Blackstone said long ago, ‘it is but reasonable that among crimes of different natures those should be most severely punished, which are the most destructive of the public safety and happiness.’ 4 W. Blackstone, Commentaries *16.”

The Supreme Court in Wisconsin v. Mitchell unanimously upheld the constitutionality of statutes that provide for enhanced penalties for bias-motivated crimes. Such statutes do not create criminality. Rather, they allow for more severe penalties for bias-motivated crimes because such crimes are more likely to cause more severe impacts on their victims and on society.

Dan L

July 5th, 2013

Translation improvements (I have a degree in Spanish):

In 2011, Congressman Carlos Bruce proposed an amendment to the Criminal Code providing that assaults on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity would be punished with severe penalties. The bill was pending in the Judiciary Committee of Congress until a month ago, when it was set aside to avoid the objections of the religious lobbies.

However, on Thursday night Congress took up the question: 56 MPs voted against the amendment, including 26 of the ruling Gana Peru Party and 16 Fujimori. “I never thought that the resistance to this social group was so large. It is a clear example of the homophobia that exists in Congress, hidden homophobia, because we won the debate but lost the vote,” Bruce said Friday to the leading Spanish newspaper El Pais. During the debate, two MPs of evangelical persuasion – one of them Fujimori, Julio Rosas – were the most reluctant. “There was no congressmen who openly objected. Except for two evangelicals with weak arguments, everyone else who spoke was in favor. But there was a silent majority that voted down [the amendment], which included the benches of the Gana Peru Party,” added Bruce.

Hunter

July 6th, 2013

Mark F.: Think of bias crimes as a form of terrorism: their effect is not only on the individual victim, but on the community to which that victim belongs.

Yuulun

July 6th, 2013

I think that the headline is misleading. Crimes are still punished regardless of victim. They voted against adding an extra deterrent, not to remove protection.

I am of mixed feeling about Hate Crime Laws. On one hand I oppose them because I have not seen any evidence that they are an effective deterrent. They are well intentioned, but I think they’re another extension of the motivation that brings us torture (oh I’m sorry, “enhanced interrogation”) and capital punishment: the desire for vengeance. That being said, it is hard to deny that many of those who vote against HCL quite often think those uppity homos don’t deserve any help.

Hue-Man

July 6th, 2013

These hate crimes are often outright terrorism. Think of Matthew Sheppard left to die on a fence in Wyoming. Closer to home and earlier this year, this headline made national news: Alleged Vancouver gay bashers acquitted in controversial verdict

“Two brothers have been acquitted of an alleged 2010 beating of a gay couple outside their Vancouver home despite the testimony of six people who said they were the men who did it” http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/alleged-vancouver-gay-bashers-acquitted-controversial-verdict190113

Lesbian and gay couples know that they too can be terrorized outside their own apartment and the courts may not convict, even with video and 6 eyewitnesses…

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1854: The Surprising Twists and Turns of a Cross-Dressing Case In London

Today In History, 1927: "The Well of Loneliness" Published

Today In History, 1969: Gay Liberation Front Organizes First Post-Stonewall March Against Police Harassment

Today In History, 1978: New Jersey Senator: "We Used To Beat Them Up"

Born On This Day, 1919: Martin Block

Born On This Day, 1927: Fr. Robert Carter, SJ

Born On This Day, 1940: Rev. Troy Perry

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.