July 11th, 2013
Yesterday someone messaged me a most perfect description of our opponents.
He and I had been tangling with NOM’s Jennifer Roback Morse on an anti-gay website, pointing out the error of using a tragic case of child abuse as an argument against same-sex marriage. Morse, on her Facebook page, claimed we were defending the abusers — “a couple of pro-gay guys circling the wagons around these creeps,” is how she put it.
It’s enough to make you wonder where she learned to read. I alerted my compatriot and he wrote back this description of Morse and her allies on that site:
Mostly they just talk to each other and, essentially, engage in a conspiracy to take each other seriously.
Read that again, just for the pleasure of it:
…engage in a conspiracy to take each other seriously.
I say that’s a perfect phrase.
It’s fluid, looks good on the page, trips off the tongue, and rewards you with deeper insight the longer you contemplate it. I’m holding on to it, and whenever I encounter a cluster of people swapping statements with no apparent connection to reality, instead of feeling baffled I’ll think: Yes! — they’re engaged in a conspiracy to take each other seriously.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
bill johnson
July 11th, 2013
That’s great and really it’s the best way to describe people who engage in such extreme levels of intellectual dishonesty on such a constant basis. I would also point out that given Jennifer Roback Morse’s education level she can’t claim ignorance either, this is deliberate misrepresentation of what is being said and she knows it.
Ryan
July 11th, 2013
Kudos to you for being able to laugh off such a disgusting character assassination.
Stephen
July 12th, 2013
This is making me think of the now defunct familyscholars.org where David Blankenhorn, Elizabeth Marquart, et al, would endlessly praise one another for their superior understanding of whatever tripe it was they were sounding off about while at the same time deleting and banning some very astute and interesting commenters for lack of ‘civility’. They banned straight grandmother, for God’s sake!
One saw over time the conversation dwindle to the same four or five voices till eventually it died of its own inertia. After the last round of banning at nomblog no one posts there, either. I imagine Tommy Peters, hunched over his Dell, pouncing on whatever slips through to delete it with the fervor of a true believer defending the ramparts of heaven.
jay
July 12th, 2013
Love Stephen’s reminiscence about familyscholars.org. Reminded me of loons like Alana S. and others who posted the most outrageous things, but when they were challenged Elizabeth Marquardt accused the protestors of being mean. There was a wonderful account of familyscholars and getreligion.org by someone at glbtq.com. Here is a link:
http://www.glbtq.com/sfeatures/confessionsofablogaddict.html
It was written before Blankenhorn flipped, but it gives a good sense of what it was like back then. Their impoverishment of ideas finally caught up with them.
Jim Hlavac
July 14th, 2013
What a great phrase — and indeed, they are in a conspiracy of the serious — to stop the militant radical homosexual – they’ve created the poor fellow, assigned him every possible worst thing imaginable, set him up a lobby and an agenda, and now they aim to stop him. The problem is, of course, is that he doesn’t exist. And then we get the um, “fun” of listening to this and trying to argue with it.
Leave A Comment