UK Marriage Equality Bill Clears Final Hurdle

Jim Burroway

July 16th, 2013

It’s a done deal. The House of Commons gave its final approval to the bill after minor changes were made by the House of Lords, which approved the bill on Monday. But not before marriage equality opponents tried a last ditch effort to ditch the bill:

Conservative MP David Burrowes had tabled an amendment and was today once again accused of trying to delay implementation of the bill. Pro-equal marriage MPs padded out their speeches so that Mr Burrowes could not propose his amendment.

The amendment he tabled sought to force the government to hold individual public consultations for changes to secondary legislation.

The bill now goes to the Queen for Royal Assent. No monarch has withheld Royal Assent since 1708.

Same-sex marriages are expected to begin in the spring or summer in 2014 in England and Wales only. Legislation to allow marriage equality in Scotland is in its initial stages. There are currently no efforts underway as yet to institute marriage equality in Northern Ireland.

(By the way, when I went to Google Images looking for an appropriate image for this post, I typed “Big Ben Gay” into the search box. This image popped up, accompanied by hundreds of results for Ben Cohen. Which is appropriate when you think about it, since today’s news clears just one more obstacle to our obvious destiny of wedded bliss together.)

Sir Andrew

July 16th, 2013

A great story and a great outcome.

Now: Would you please find a better flag pic for heading up these stories. That flag is upside down. According to its designer, Gilbert Baker, and the filings with the international group that handles flags and standards, the red stripe is always on top when presented horizontally, and on the left (to the viewer) when presented vertically. It shows disrespect to our community to display it upside down.

I know you found this on Google, but the person waving the flag has got it wrong.


July 16th, 2013

Maybe it’s actually the Peace Flag.


July 16th, 2013

Your headline is inaccurate as you explain in the body of your post. Since Scotland and Ireland don’t yet have marriage equality it wasn’t a UK marriage equality bill but rather a England and Wales marriage equality bill.


July 16th, 2013

Excuse me. Northern Ireland.

Timothy Kincaid

July 16th, 2013

And the UK has gone and screwed up the numbering system. This vote makes England and Wales the 16th country to have marriage equality.

Kind of.

So when Scotland gets equality (on track for about a year behind England and Wales), do they get a whole number for themselves or are they grandfathered in to E&W? Maybe the 16 1/2th?


July 16th, 2013

I’m just waiting for Ireland to get marriage equality. The Catholic Church went crazy in France over this and over abortion in Ireland imagine how much the catholic church would flip their shit if and when Ireland goes equality.


July 17th, 2013

Umm… I’m going to neither criticize the title or the flag. And I think Sir Andrew is being tongue-in-cheek? Deadpan gets me every time.

This is a great day!


July 17th, 2013


There is massive public and govt support for gay marriage in the Republic of Ireland, but they have to amend their constitution first apparently and don’t know how long that takes or how easy it is.

the opposition to equal marriage in Northern Ireland comes from protestant fundie presbytarian types (the DUP). Sinn Fein (the major Catholic party) has always voted pro equal marriage.

also HURRAY!!! we will be converting our civil partnership into a marriage ASAP


July 17th, 2013

There are some in the UK who can probably explain this…

I am not sure when it happened, but I know that Scotland was granted limited autonomy relatively recently. I wasn’t sure of the details, but I guess this type of law change is one of those things over which they retain separate rights.

I do know that “UK” includes Northern Ireland, so this is more a “modified Great Britain” :)


July 17th, 2013

There are currently no efforts underway as yet to institute marriage equality in Northern Ireland.

Not entirely true, depending on which way you split the hair.

A Bill to legalise equal marriage failed at Stormont (NI legislature) only a few months ago. Since Sinn Fein is taking a very active stance on LGBT rights generally (e.g. their recent statements regarding Russian anti-gay laws) and on this issue in particular, it is only a matter of time before it comes up again.

One of the main reasons why it will sooner or later come up again (and I suspect sooner rather than later) is because it exposes a systemic problem with the way Stormont works, one which potentially makes it even more unworkable than US Congress. Ordinarily a legislative assembly requires a simple majority to pass a law – it’s a given for virtually every democratically elected legislature on the planet. Two notable exceptions are the US Senate, where a supermajority is required to end a filibuster, and Stormont, where majorities are needed in both Catholic/Nationalist and Protestant/Unionist blocs. This is like requiring majority support from both the GOP and the Dems, and since neither bloc has an outright majority in the Assembly, it allows less than a quarter of MLAs (26 for the Unionists, 22 for the Nationalists, out of 108 in total) to block legislation.

So simple majority support is irrelevant: majority support is also needed from the Unionists. Getting the current Pope to support gay marriage, abortion and women’s liberation would be both easier and more believable.

Since the Republic of Ireland is likely to legalise within the next few years, this causes a potential constitutional crisis as it means a minority group is blocking legislation favoured by not only a majority of MLAs (representatives in the Northern Ireland Assembly) but also the two national legislatures (Parliament and Oireachtas) with joint authority over the province.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.