A Model for 2014 Olympians

Jim Burroway

August 13th, 2013

Nick Symmonds is a straight ally and a middle distance runner who is in Moscow right now for the World Track and Field Championships. He took the silver medal in the men’s 800 meters, and told R-Sport (which is part of RIA Novosti, Russia’s state-owned news agency) that he was dedicating his win to his gay and lesbian friends back home. RIA Novosti said his statement made him “the first athlete to openly criticize Russia’s controversial anti-gay law on the country’s soil.”:

“As much as I can speak out about it, I believe that all humans deserve equality as however God made them,” he told R-Sport after running a 1:43.55 at Moscow’s Luzhniki Stadium. “Whether you’re gay, straight, black, white, we all deserve the same rights. If there’s anything I can do to champion the cause and further it, I will, shy of getting arrested.”

…”I respect Russians’ ability to govern their people,” he said Tuesday. “I disagree with their laws. I do have respect for this nation. I disagree with their rules.”

Symmonds had earlier said that he wouldn’t criticize Russia during the games.

Timothy Kincaid

August 13th, 2013

I have a new hero


August 13th, 2013

That beats the hell out of the article he wrote for runnersworld.com last week. I hope he’s rethought some of the things he said in that article; particularly the thoughtless comparison to being a polite dinner guest who didn’t lecture his host on how to raise their kids.


August 14th, 2013

Hey, TampaZeke,

This is actually precisely what he said he would do. He said he would not be criticizing Russia there, that he’d just dedicate his win to his gay and lesbian friends.

So, presumably, his comparison of visiting someone who is disciplining their children still holds. Even as that parent is allowing another child to kick and abuse the lgbt child.


August 14th, 2013

Oh, hey – cool, this article wasn’t written by Tim, does that mean that comments won’t be deleted by the editor?

I am seeing a LOT of threads internationally – I have very close friends in the leadership of GLISA (and yes, the OutGames just finished up the other day – congrats to all!).

I see many gay or gay-supportive peole pushing for what I can only describe is unrealistic boycotting of the Sochi games. I see people who did not live through the last round of boycotts (’80, ’84) suggesting that athletes should basically throw their life’s dreams into a trashbin to suit their personal sociopolitical point of view, and even to make it sound easy. All of which strikes me as remarkably naive, selfish, and short-sighted.

I’ve even seen someone commenting that all the gay athletes should march into the Olympics as their own “country”

Even assuming that the IOC, which won’t even allow rainbow pins, would ever permit such a thing… how does this play out in the context of recent political gains? Doesn’t this look a lot like, well, ingratitude, and a lack of patriotism?

Doesn’t this disregard the fight by so many to do the opposite — that is, to gain their full citizenship in their native countries and all the rights they’re entitled to. They should bail on their country now in order to make a grand entrance? How does separation strengthen our message? How does it protect our athletes (Munich anyone?)? How would that play on TV during the frankly nationalistic coverage of the Olympics?

I think we find the answer with Mr. Symmonds here – and in this, I find this article incredibly helpful (and have referenced it in many other places.

Great pickup, Jim, and one that I think speaks to an issue of great controversy within gay and gay-supportive communities right now. I’m really hoping that we can find a way to support our athletes, and find ways to express support for LGBT Russians this summer. It doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game.


August 14th, 2013

Speaking of the OutGames.

How is it possible that we have an obtrusive posting on the details of the medical treatment being provided to a staffer at an anti-gay advocacy group, but we didn’t see ONE ARTICLE on the OutGames – an international sports event with over 5,000 athletes from over 100 countries?

I have serious questions about the objectivity and what I can only describe as obsessive interest on the part of some concerning intimate and possibly HIPAA-protected details of the lives of their advocacy counterparts. I believe it has, and will continue to, impact the quality of commentary here, and negatively impact the reputation of this thread.

Timothy (TRiG)

August 14th, 2013

Doesn’t this look a lot like, well, ingratitude, and a lack of patriotism?

Ingratitude for what? I’m not clear on what you’re saying there.

(And I’ve never seen the point of patriotism anyway.)



August 14th, 2013

Victor, he actually did criticize Russia in Russia so I think he reconsidered his earlier statement.


August 14th, 2013

Tim, the question of ingratitude is ill-founded, but a could follow naturally in the mind of some outside our community in the context I described – the Olympics have nationalistic overtones, and it often bruises feelings when athletes compete or even march with a country other than their own in the opening. In what I described, if all the gay athletes to refuse to march with their own country in an event with nationalistic/patriotic overtones at the same time that they are claiming their rights in those countries, it could be seen / spun as a slap at their own country, rather than as a slap to the Russians – it’s unfortunately open to interpretation, and badly timed.

But thank you for posting, since your viewpoint, or the narrowness of it, and requirement that others share it or be muzzled is very much at question here.

I question why you are meddling in the details of the private lives of anti-gay activists (and demanding that people here support you in that or be silent) a the expense of covering a massive 2-week international gay sporting event. It manages to be both creepy and oppressive at the same time, which is a neat accomplishment.


August 14th, 2013


You’re right. I shouldn’t have been reading the post late at night.


August 14th, 2013

If anyone is wondering about the effect (in Russian) – it’s been minimal. Currently, only one Russian-language news source inside Russia has a very short piece about it. The other publication is in Russian from Armenia. Both cite foreign-language publications. The Russian news site does not have the piece even on its sports page, while the (marginal) Armenian publication does. (While there are almost 400 English-language news stories about it as of now. Per Google News.)


August 14th, 2013

Victor, the internal Russian homophobia – at least to me – appears to be a campaign of xenophobia and nationalism that is intended for internal consumption. If so, they aren’t going to publicize anything that doesn’t further the actual aim – to solidify support internally through what amounts to picking on scapegoats.

Publicizing this article does nothing for Putin, so I don’t expect to see it go anywhere internally. There’s nothing to be gained by it. They aren’t really invested in this conflict, it’s merely a means to an end.


August 14th, 2013

You’re right as far as Russian sources that are officially connected. However, there are also independent news sites and influential Russian-language sites in the Ukraine and the Baltics (and, to a degree, Israel). As far as I know, Google News indexes Ukrainian and Baltic ones, too. However, they don’t seem to come up through Google News search. On the other hand, at least some smaller sites are reporting it.


August 14th, 2013

Victor – that is really cool information. And what do we know about the anti-gay constructs going on in other Eastern European nations? If Russian homophobia is rooted in nationalistic xenophobia, what’s going on in the remainder of the old Soviet bloc? Why are gays suddenly the objects of scrutiny, and why are they losing out so badly elsewhere?


August 14th, 2013

(no, seriously, that’s a question… i’m trying to out how it’s all working out there.


August 14th, 2013

Whatever is going on in Russia does affect nearby nations. However, in the Baltics – as they are in the EU – there is free press, and in Ukraine, there are as many papers as there are opinions. (Well, maybe that one is an exaggeration.)

They’re losing out so badly everywhere for the same reason that gays were losing out in the US even two decades ago. Not many people are out even to their families. Many people – if not the vast majority – do believe gays are pedophiles. And they definitely espouse the view that gays want to recruit their children… So, the politicians are not just acting out of fear of Putin or something. Many of them believe this in earnest.

If you are asking about “que sera?” I’d guess that Ukraine won’t adopt a similar law – they want more open access to the EU. The Baltics will likely either be stopped or will have to come up with ways of soft application of such laws (I can’t remember which one of the three already has something like that…).


August 14th, 2013

And, not to forget, but what we have in Ukraine and the Baltics are evangelical and charismatic churches trying to spread their message – including the anti-gay part. (In fact, the big group in Ukraine, “Love against homosexuality,” was founded and is run by a Protestant of some kind – sorry, I don’t remember which; mind you, the guy is now, I believe in his 30’s, and is still single! Yes, I am implying what I am implying.)

In Ukraine, these churches and groups regularly organize “family marches” (against homosexuality).


August 14th, 2013

BTW, the “vkontakte” (equivalent of facebook) group “Straights for Equality” (Альянс гетеросексуалов за равноправие ЛГБТ) – this is a legitimate group, which participated in protests – has a link by one of their activists to an Armenian news site, which according to his translation says that the Russian Ambassador in Yerevan (capital of Armenia) has invited heads of (I assume) companies, which operate in Russia, to discuss pulling sponsorship of newspapers, which he considers as furthering “homosexual propaganda.”

news source:

Straights for Equality:


August 14th, 2013

Sorry for multiple posts. I meant to say “(I assume Armenian) companies…”

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.