Pat Buchanan Wants The US To Be More Like Russia

Jim Burroway

August 14th, 2013

I never thought I’d see the day when Pat Buchanan would argue that the United States of America should throw out the First Amendment and emulate Russia:

Only yesterday, homosexual sodomy, which Thomas Jefferson said should be treated like rape, was outlawed in many states and same-sex marriage was regarded as an absurdity. Was that America we grew up in really like Nazi Germany? In the Catholic schools this writer attended, pornography – let alone homosexual propaganda – would get one expelled. Was this really just like Kristallnacht?

As Father Regis Scanlon writes in Crisis Magazine, in 2005, Pope Benedict XVI reiterated Catholic doctrine that homosexuality is a “strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil,” an “objective disorder.” That homosexual acts are unnatural and immoral remains Catholic teaching. Thus, if we seek to build a Good Society by traditional Catholic and Christian standards, why should not homosexual propaganda be treated the same as racist or anti-Semitic propaganda? We can no longer even agree on what is good and evil.

…Putin is trying to re-establish the Orthodox Church as the moral compass of the nation it had been for 1,000 years before Russia fell captive to the atheistic and pagan ideology of Marxism.

“The adoption of Christianity,” declared Putin, “became a turning point in the fate of our fatherland, made it an inseparable part of the Christian civilization and helped turn it into one of the largest world powers.”

Buchanan titles his post, “Which Side Are You On?” Good question, Buchanan. Which side are you on? America’s or Russia’s?

TampaZeke

August 14th, 2013

Ignorance and hate make for strange bedfellows!

Jay

August 14th, 2013

TampaZeke, Buchanan and Putin are not strange bedfellows. They are both fascists.

MattNYC

August 14th, 2013

QED – My comments about the “uniqueness” of Russian homophobia and a nostalgia for the “good old” ’50s.

Charles

August 14th, 2013

Buchanan has kept his mind closed during the last 50 or so years to the revelation that homosexuality is no more of an evil than being left handed. God gave us a brain to use and mental health experts have determined that one doesn’t choose their sexual orientation. Does Buchanan want to bring back burning at the stake for those accused of being witches?

………….has his sister come out of the closet, yet?

Andrew

August 14th, 2013

The discussion of “sides” here is unfortunate, since I’m really not looking forward to the return to cold war mentalities that Putin is returning us to. The one vaguely decent thing about Buchanan’s mindset is that he does not apparently see the world in that binary anymore, and I kind of wish this article didn’t do that in the very last line (America *or* Russia’s) – I regret that we seem to be seeing the media in this country reflecting the anti-American sentiment outside of Russia that Putin is using to bolster his nationalistic support inside of Russia. Each time we use “us or them” when speaking of Russia, we play into Putin’s message and strengthen his hand. The story of Russian oppression all along has never been about Russia or the USSR vs. the West – that’s the story they tell – it’s been about their government versus their own people and against human dignity.

But yes, this reflects an unsettling set of priorities in Buchanan – that he would laud an oppressive state in their activities rather than see them in their larger context which spells trouble for many Russians in many contexts.

Marcus

August 14th, 2013

Well said, Andrew. It’s disappointing when LGBT-rights supporters resort to sexism, racism, or on this issue, xenophobia. If anything, we should be better at keeping ourselves away from bigotry.

MattNYC

August 14th, 2013

“Does Buchanan want to bring back burning at the stake for those accused of being witches?”

The answer is clearly, “yes”–and he’d classify as “witches” a great many people with whom he disagrees. For fun, go watch his 1992 GOP Convention speech, on which the great Molly Ivins commented, “probably sounded even better in the original German.”

gar

August 14th, 2013

What TampaZeke said.

Pat’s a kook. A fringe. A pompous cipher, albeit a dangerously noisy one.

MattNYC

August 14th, 2013

This isn’t about West versus East or Left vs. Right.

It’s about enlightenment versus medieval times.

The only bigotry I hold is against bigotry. Calling out Russia and Dark Age ideologues like Buchanan is not bigotry.

And on Russians in general, this isn’t like the view of the world of the “re-election” of Bush in 2004 (at least many in the world recognized the theft even as they shook their heads at our susceptibility to Goering-style misinformation). Russians in all wide polling seem to have owned this desire to circle the wagons and act like savages.

Charles

August 14th, 2013

By the way Russian psychiatry is still mostly controlled by the state. There is a small independent organization that is tolerated.

Marcus

August 14th, 2013

MattNYC,

There’s a difference between calling out Russian leaders on their bigotry (not xenophobic) and treating the Russian people as a monolith, blaming them for their government’s actions, and generalizing with anti-Russian stereotypes (xenophobic).

Andrew

August 14th, 2013

Marcus, I certainly did not mean to imply that there was xenophobia or bigotry going on here – not at all.

It’s just an unfortunate turn of phrase in the posting that plays off of what Buchanan had to say. My comment was intended to be a minor nudge, not a condemnatory statement. And it comes in the context of breathless media coverage elsewhere about “the return of the cold war”, honestly… my comment really is intended to serve as a coda to keep that particular phrasing (us v them) from becoming an accepted subtext.

I’m all about subtext – it’s the accidental or intentional insertion of facts not in evidence into a conversation or argument, and it serves to shape debate through language rather than through persuasion.

I feel certain that Jim is not a “cold-warrior”. What’s weird for me, here, however, is that Buchanan – who is a great candidate for that label – is not adopting the mantle being dragged out of deep closets by his conservative allies who are grumbling along those lines. That is what is fascinating here. All the old Hawks are talking “return of cold war” and Buchanan is out-of-step with them in admiring Russian social conservatism. That says something very interesting, and why it’s well worth posting.

Sorry, Jim, I think you tried to summarize a lot with a few short deft penstrokes. I think I appreciate where you’re coming from !!!!

Priya Lynn

August 14th, 2013

Andrew said “The one vaguely decent thing about Buchanan’s mindset is that he does not apparently see the world in that binary anymore, and I kind of wish this article didn’t do that in the very last line (America *or* Russia’s)”.

Although Andrew may have more or less said what I’m about to I want to say that I don’t think the “America *or* Russia’s) comment was meant in the general sense of “everything American good, everything Russian bad” but rather in the sense of “Are you on the side of Russia’s anti-gay oppression or are you on the side of America’s acceptance of gays?”. In that limited sense it most certainly is “Us versus Them”.

TomTallis

August 14th, 2013

Some people outlive their souls…

Andrew

August 14th, 2013

Priya, I wholeheartedly agree, and I’d love to see that carefully parsed – there are so many lugheads out there in the boorah crowd who would love to see a return of the Evil Empire so we know who to hate again.

I also want to remind folks that the kernel of homophobia in Russia appears to be a hypermasculine militarized nationalistic culture of aggrievement in the post-Soviet empire.

Putin has successfully convinced Russia that “The West” is responsible for the lousy state of affairs in Russia today, while leveraging his martial and ridiculously “masculine” persona. In this context, “gays” are “Western corruption”, especially from a masculinity point of view (in their limited worldview).

The reason I highlight that is to point out that even to put the moral question into an “us” versus “them” argument risks bolstering and underscoring the game Putin is playing. He sounds the call from within, and by responding to it, we confirm it from without. The result is very convincing to the average Russian. LGBT Russians lose – badly – despite our best intentions.

What I haven’t figured out yet is how to confound what is really a very nasty clever little construct Putin (and many other repressive leaders) have created — oppress your people, blame outside corruption, and when outsiders critize your repressive tactics, use that as proof that they’re responsible for the corruption. You’re damned if you speak out, but you’re certainly damed if you remain silent.

Marcus

August 14th, 2013

Andrew – I wasn’t singling out any comment in particular, or even necessarily the comments on BTB. But the subtext you’re describing so eloquently is infiltrating much of the online discussion of Russia’s homophobic laws, and I think it’s accurate to call that subtext xenophobic.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Social Conservatives In Morelos Mobilize To Block Marriage Equality

Federal Court Re-opens Marriage Equality Case Over Mississippi's "Religious Freedom" Law

Morelos On the Cusp Of Enacting Marriage Equality

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1969: Stonewall

Today In History, 1970: First Gay Pride Marches to Commemorate Stonewall

Today In History, 2000: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Boy Scouts' Gay Ban

Today In History, 2009: Fort Worth Police Raid the Rainbow Lounge

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.