San Antonio passes non-discrimination ordinance

Timothy Kincaid

September 5th, 2013

There’s nothing particularly controversial about the ordinance being considered today by the San Antonio City Council. It’s virtually identical to ordinances in hundreds of cities around the country – and around Texas.

But for some reason, conservative Republicans and anti-gay activists decided to make this vote their Alamo. So heavy hitters from U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz to the candidates vying for the Republican nomination for governor all put in their two cents about how bigotry should be a perfectly legal reason for San Antonio’s residents to fire and evict their gay neighbors.

And they lost. Badly. (StarTrib)

The 8-3 City Council vote in favor of the ordinance was a victory for gay rights advocates and for Democratic Mayor Julian Castro, a top surrogate of President Barack Obama. Castro has called the ordinance overdue in the nation’s seventh-largest city, where there is a stronger current of traditionalism and conservatism than other major Texas cities that already have similar gay rights protections.

It may well be that, like the Battle of the Alamo, conservatives are counting on shock and horror to propel a powerful backlash. I think they are seriously misunderstood the political climate. Even in Texas.


September 5th, 2013

It’s really sad and shameful that two of the three no votes were from women of color.


September 5th, 2013

Any particular reason for the Alamo stand? It was all over the right wing blogs and I couldn’t figure out why.


September 5th, 2013

They’re hoping for a victory, any victory; and they thought that SA, being in the south and fairly conservative would be the right place to take a stand. They were badly mistaken, and instead chalked up another loss in what has been a very bad year for them.

Chris McCoy

September 5th, 2013

markanthony said

Any particular reason for the Alamo stand?

The Alamo is in San Antonio.

Chris McCoy

September 5th, 2013

Here’s what local news sources are reporting.

Most noteworthy:

Because there were eight affirmative votes, the ordinance takes effect immdeiately.


September 5th, 2013

The Alamo would be a perfect metaphor for these homophobes and social conservatives since the Alamo’s real history wasn’t nearly as heroic or honorable as it’s been portrayed in Texas/American history books. There again, Texas has never been known for its high academic/history standards.

Timothy Kincaid

September 5th, 2013

It’s possible that it’s even more of a loss for the anti-gays than at first glance.

Council members Elisa Chan, Ivy Taylor and Carlton Soules voted against adding LGBT protections. Chan and Soules voted against adding veteran status protections.

I don’t know Chan and Soules, but by voting against veterans status, it may be that their opposition comes from libertarian principles rather than anti-gay animus. (Most social conservatives are not anti-veteran). It may be that the anti-gays only ended up with a single council member voting based on animus.


September 6th, 2013

Timothy – maybe you missed the whole Elisa Chan brouhaha in the run-up to this vote. Just google her name and you’ll find that she is not shy in proclaiming her ‘anti-gay animus.’

Timothy Kincaid

September 6th, 2013


Thanks! I had seen all that but I didn’t make the connection.

Such a lovely lady, isn’t she? And she seems to believe that if truly vile things are said in the privacy of her constituent-paid office with her constituent-paid staff, that it’s nobody’s business but her own.

In her case, I’m not sure if it’s that she hates veterans as well, or if she’s just so stupid that she hasn’t the faintest clue what she’s voting on.


September 6th, 2013

Even if she legitimately hates gays, it would be hard to defend her considering her anti-vet vote (no matter the reason). Her opponents will have a field day with her in her next election campaign.


September 7th, 2013

Because some of those veterans are gay. Duh!

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts


Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.