Boehner support gay GOP candidates

Timothy Kincaid

December 5th, 2013

Sometimes the extra-special brand of crazy right-wing nutcases are useful. Like, for example, Virginia Representative Randy Forbes. (Politico)

Forbes has waged a lengthy crusade to convince his colleagues and the National Republican Congressional Committee brass they shouldn’t back some gay candidates. His efforts on Capitol Hill were described to POLITICO by more than a half-dozen sources with direct knowledge of the talks.

Republican leadership is only in the infancy stage of wooing gay voters, but they recognize that to be a viable party in the future they need to shed the anti-gay rhetoric and ideology (among other positions). And they have taken steps, including putting party support behind a handful of gay GOP candidates.

Yet they also recognize that this will not sit well with a segment of their constituency, so they are not trumpeting their support of gay candidates on a broad scale. However, Forbes’ obnoxious hate-filled grandstanding forced the hand of leadership.

On Thursday, following POLITICO’S report, Speaker John Boehner said his party should support gay Republican congressional candidates.

Many Republicans seem willing to back DeMaio. Rep. Darrell Issa, a senior California Republican who has endorsed him, said that “he will be supported by the NRCC when he wins the primary.”

“I will see to that,” said Issa, who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Asked about Speaker John Boehner’s policy toward gay candidates, an aide pointed to several contributions the Ohio Republican made to Tisei during the past election cycle. Boehner also visited Boston to raise money for Tisei during the summer of 2012.

This is, of course, no indication that the party as a whole is supportive of gay issues or that it is going to become so overnight. It does, however, suggest that the leadership now recognizes that it can no longer be associated with blatant bigotry and it sends a signal that the power of the far right within the party may be waning.


December 5th, 2013

It says everything one needs to know about the party when this is lauded a great accomplishment.


December 5th, 2013

Now they just need to stop supporting racist, sexist, anti-science, and xenophobic candidates and policies and they could possibly survive. For me, supporting a few token gay candidates does not change my view of the party.


December 5th, 2013

I’m not sure it says that at all. At least not at this point. Besides, the Republican Party could choose from a number of type of gay conservatives that would pass the most right-wing, anti-gay litmus test they could come up with with flying colors.


December 5th, 2013

Wow, Tampa, I had not even heard of before. I agree with you. As seen by the likes of GOProud you can gay men, I think it’s entirely men in GOProud, that will be as anti-gay as they can be.

enough already

December 5th, 2013

Well, it’s an interesting situation.
I’ll withhold comment until I see how this plays out.
Generally speaking, the Republicans and the hateful christians never do anything which is not aimed at stripping us of our rights, whether in the short term or the long.

[TK: I corrected your typo in the word “Republicans” as I’m sure that you did not intend to use hate-speech in violation of our Comments Policy]

Donny D.

December 6th, 2013

It isn’t a matter of being either homophobic or pro-gay. The GOP doesn’t want to lose the homophobes that support it. But on the other hand, outright homophobia now alienates too many people. The GOP isn’t just looking at possible gay (or even L, B or T) voters, but also at the larger and growing number of cisgender straight people who don’t like overt homophobia.

It will try to balance continuing to appeal to homophobes with not alienating and maybe even appealing to LGB people and their allies. It’ll be interesting to see how well they pull it off.


December 6th, 2013

He is caught in a trap he created for himself. He just made comments about how enda was unnecessary. It would be terribly difficult to claim employment fairness isn’t warranted when they themselves continue to demonstrate its need in real time during this election cycle.

Jim Hlavac

December 6th, 2013

Remember – the Democrats went through the same process. For we are not a political issue of any common sort – gayness is just so different.

You know, I don’t think many gay men of today realize that just 20 years ago both parties were pretty much the same on gay stuff: hated it. Remember, too, that pretty much all the states that still had no-gay sex laws until 2003 were Democratic run states. Plus, majorities of blacks, who vote 95% Democrat — are still very anti-gay. This idea that somehow Democrats were “for” us all along is absurd. They just merely “evolved” faster than other heteros. Why, Obama, Biden and Hillary Clinton all said repeatedly during their campaigns that they were against gay marriage — then they all evolved in the last year or two.

So, help the Republicans evolve — so we can get beyond this 60 year discussion over our existence – instead of constantly berating them. We had to help the Democrats — so we should the Republicans — for heteros are heteros..

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.