A ducking stupid controversy

Timothy Kincaid

December 22nd, 2013

So if you ask the long-haired wild-bearded Southern hillbilly redneck biker-wannabe Jesus freak from the reality show about long-haired wild-bearded Southern hillbilly redneck biker-wannabe Jesus freaks about gays, it turns out he has long-haired wild-bearded Southern hillbilly redneck biker-wannabe Jesus freak opinions. Who’d a thunk it?

In the past week we’ve added two new equality states to the total, the Ugandan parliament has passed their odious Anti-Homosexuality Bill, and three world leaders have announced that they will not be attending Russia’s Olympics due to its homophobic laws. Anyone care?

Not much. Instead the media and blogosphere is obsessed with Phil Robertson. Does he have free speech rights? Should A&E have fired him? What other things has he said? Will Cracker Barrel carry his merchandise?

I couldn’t ducking care less!

But as this thing doesn’t appear to be going away, here are my two cents. Don’t spend them all at once.

For those of you who have blissfully missed the controversy, Phil Robertson is the patriarch of a family that operates a duck-call manufacturing business and which is the subject of a reality television show called Duck Dynasty. He was a hard drinking, pill popping, bar fighting kind of guy who found Jesus and settled down to hunt ducks and raise a family.

Duck Dynasty is the highest rated show on the A&E Channel.

This year the hype caught up to me so I recorded and watched a few episodes of the show. It’s bilge, reality television at its worst.

Reality television, that genre in which artificially contrived plot lines and scripted scenarios are acted out by ‘non-actors’ who generally use their own names, is pretty light-weight entertainment to begin with. This show, however, takes artifice and banality to all new highs. Not only are the self-promoting family members (this is their third reality show after creating a youtube series) completely artificial roles, but the antics they get up to are absurdly unrealistic. Even their trademark beards used to be shaved after duck season; now they are part of the show’s contract.

The program is supposed to be about Phil Robertson, his wife Miss Kay, three of his four sons Willie, Jase, and Jep, as they live a hunter’s life and run a multi-million dollar business. But very little business appears to get done, or duck-calls made, and we are treated to the family drama of a family without drama. Basically Leave it to Beaver plotlines, but without the charm or the convincing acting.

In one of the episodes I watched, Jase wanted an office so he built one right off the outside door of Willie’s office. In one afternoon. Without anyone noticing. And when Willie found out, he attached a rope to the office and drug it to Miss Kay’s so it could be a goat shed. Supposedly down a public road. Without wheels. And it arrived intact.

In another, the family goes to Hawaii where the drama was whether the family would go along with Willie’s itinerary. Oh, and will Phil sleep all day? I found that last question to be so inspiring that I turned it off, deleted all the episodes, and went to bed.

But the show has a huge following, and I think that is for a simple reason. Most television is designed to appeal to the largest television markets, urban centers. And those who live outside cities seldom find television shows that reflect their lives, issues, and interests.

And this is especially true when it comes to faith. More than 40% of Americans claim to attend church weekly (and at least half of them actually do), but almost no one on television goes. None of the big network lineups seem to have even a passing acquaintance with church attendance and certainly you don’t see anyone praying. In fact, the only shows I can think of in which the family regularly attends church are animations.

So Duck Dynasty with it’s praying, church going, rural living good ol’ boys who spend a lot of time loving and caring for their family has an appeal to people who seem themselves as similar. And having sat through more than a few dreadful gay movies, I can see how something even as craptastic as Duck Dynasty could have the appeal of familiarity to a huge chunk of this country, even if it is an entirely fictitious presentation.

But now there’s a huge huge big dramatic oh my god clutch your pearls controversy. In an interview with GQ Magazine, Phil decided to evangelize.

“We’re Bible-thumpers who just happened to end up on television,” he tells me. “You put in your article that the Robertson family really believes strongly that if the human race loved each other and they loved God, we would just be better off. We ought to just be repentant, turn to God, and let’s get on with it, and everything will turn around.”

What does repentance entail? Well, in Robertson’s worldview, America was a country founded upon Christian values (Thou shalt not kill, etc.), and he believes that the gradual removal of Christian symbolism from public spaces has diluted those founding principles. (He and Si take turns going on about why the Ten Commandments ought to be displayed outside courthouses.) He sees the popularity of Duck Dynasty as a small corrective to all that we have lost.

“Everything is blurred on what’s right and what’s wrong,” he says. “Sin becomes fine.”

What, in your mind, is sinful?

“Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men,” he says. Then he paraphrases Corinthians: “Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers—they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”

And in case that wasn’t enough, he later expounds on his religious conversion.

As far as Phil is concerned, he was literally born again. Old Phil—the guy with the booze and the pills—died a long time ago, and New Phil sees no need to apologize for him: “We never, ever judge someone on who’s going to heaven, hell. That’s the Almighty’s job. We just love ’em, give ’em the good news about Jesus—whether they’re homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort ’em out later, you see what I’m saying?”

And he expounded a bit more on what seems to be a real concern of his

“It seems like, to me, a vagina—as a man—would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me. I’m just thinking: There’s more there! She’s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I’m saying? But hey, sin: It’s not logical, my man. It’s just not logical.”

The significant number of gay employees at A&E didn’t much like being thrown in the same category as terrorist or goat aficionados. And that he threw his former drunk self in the mix wasn’t much solace.

So A&E put him on “indefinite suspension”. And the duck hit the fan.

People were furious that a good Christian man could be fired just for saying what the Bible says. Those little parts about terrorist and goat aficionados were irrelevant, this was an attack on free speech and religious freedom.

Conservatives and religious, family, and anti-gay groups squawked and quacked. NOM (having decided that anything anti-gay is now ‘defending marriage’) launched their most successful petition to date, demanding Robertson’s reinstatement and getting more signatures in a few days than either their Dump Starbucks or Dump General Mills efforts did in months.

A&E is continuing to air episodes shot before the kerfuffle and it remains to be seen how long (or if) Robertson’s shooting schedule will be limited to ducks. The family has announced that if he’s banned, they won’t perform.

So that’s the story and now on to the questions.

Is Robertson a bigot?

Yeah, that’s probably a good term. If you think that immorality starts with homosexuality and then spreads to bestiality and terrorism, you aren’t really basing your views on logic, thoughtful discourse, or even the bible.

Is Robertson entitled to spout his nonsense?

Yep. Just like I’m entitled to call him an ignoramus.

Should he have been suspended by A&E?

That’s really up to A&E. If they believed that he offended their employees or that sponsors would pull out or that he had poorly represented the network, then they are entitled to boot his vagina-loving ass.

But, we probably also should be aware that they had to know that the controversy would fire up the crazies and that their ratings are going to go through the roof.

And, as a bonus, now they have a new plotline to write about that isn’t completely and entirely contrived.

Is the show going to downplay religion?

Nope. In fact, Alan Robertson, son number four, joined the cast for their fourth season. Before joining, Alan had been the pastor of a church for 20 years and he sees the show as a way to preach his beliefs.

And with all the new fine Christian people tuning in to see what it’s all about, you can be sure that there will be a strong religious component to keep them coming back.

Is Robertson being attacked for his religious beliefs?

No, he’s being attacked for being an ignorant idiot who thinks that the height of immorality is two people of the same sex falling in love. If your launching point to Jesus is always from the handful of Scripture that can be read to be anti-gay, your issue has little to do with Scripture or with Jesus.

But he would definitely think that is why he’s being attacked.

Can we all just shut the duck up about this nonsense now?

Yes, please.

Priya Lynn

December 22nd, 2013

” The family has announced that if he’s banned, they won’t perform.”.

Actually they announced the might not perform.

I also don’t give a damn one way or the other – never watched the show and never will.

Richard Rush

December 22nd, 2013

Isn’t it probable that at least one member of the Robertson clan is gay or lesbian? Unless he/she/they is/are closeted, I wonder what life is like among those wonderful “praying, church going, rural living good ol’ boys who spend a lot of time loving and caring for their family.” Or, more likely, they would have been sent to NARTH, and/or they are now wandering around homeless in New York City.

If NARTH is not one of the advertisers on Duck Dynasty, they are missing a golden opportunity.


December 22nd, 2013

Whether or not you think this is a controversy, every single news outlet is talking about this. Way to come late to the party.

Does btb have anything relevant to offer anymore?


December 22nd, 2013

And just in case someone thinks I’m being unfair, there were two nuggets in this piece I didn’t know about – those being the youtube series they had launched. I do appreciate those links and will watch them when I have time.

But every single other point has been handled ably by towle, jmg, goodasyou, and even Bill O’Reilly. What’s the original angle here? What pearl of wisdom required all this time to sit upon?


December 22nd, 2013

If you turn on your television right now you’ll see that A&E is running a Duck Dynasty MARATHON that has been running back to back episodes ALL DAY and will continue until 3am. I’m surprised that no one seems to have noticed this. Coincidence? I don’t think so. I’m really starting to believe that this whole thing was a publicity stunt by A&E with no concern or thought to the deep and lasting damage that the gay community would face. There is a fever pitch of anti-gay hatred in the air. Fox News and right wing and Christian media have been in a tirade 24 hours a day for days now. The mainstream media has carried the “free speech violation” water and left wing blogs and media have been virtually silent or neutral. People who I thought were allies are buying 100% into the “vicious, anti-Christian, intolerant gay bullies” meme. The reality of how quickly so much hate can come flooding our way and how our allies/the media/progressives at best sit silent and at worst throw us to the wolves is really frightening to me.


December 23rd, 2013

DN, none of the blogs you listed have reported on A&E’s all-day Duck Dynasty marathon today.


December 23rd, 2013

Richard Rush, sure people tend to reflect upon what they believe when it hits closest to home but I don’t think that the outcome is always the same when it comes to the position on homosexuality. Specially if it is something that you so staunchly believe in.

“Is Robertson being attacked for his religious beliefs?”

Yes, imo, but I don’t see how that matters in context. If your beliefs can not co-exist with the policies of the company… Should the company dismiss the policy to align itself with every religious belief it encounters? Is this what is sought by all the uprising on the attack of religious liberty? TO me the answer is no… Policies will inevitably be inconsistent because religious beliefs can be and are mutually exclusive to each other.

Just because his religious beliefs are exactly like what you’d (Timothy) consider an ignorant idiot’s to be, does not mean that they are no longer HIS religious beliefs. Religious beliefs are 100% arbitrary to whatever the person wants to attribute religious belief to, or is there a standard to what religious beliefs can encompass or stem from? I don’t think so. SO yes, I would completely understand how he or others would consider it an attack on religious belief.


December 23rd, 2013

Funny; I’ve only seen three or four episodes (my family in south Georgia loves the show, so I watched it with them one day) and Hawaii was one of them.

Another was this: one of them bought a chair another didn’t like, so they spent the rest of the episode at an arcade. No, of course that doesn’t make any sense, why should it?


December 23rd, 2013

What baffles me is that NOT ONE TALKING LGBT HEAD in this vaunted “community” has had the common sense to say the ONLY thing that matters in this: It is perfectly legal to fire any LGBT person in 29 of these United States for simply being LGBT – whether or not they themselves ever even utter the words. By failing to cast this in the light of what REAL discrimination is, our glorious “leaders” have bought into the free-speech malarkey of The Right and missed a Golden Opportunity to turn this into a Teachable Moment.

Priya Lynn

December 23rd, 2013

Great point Victor. All those bigots screaming what an injustice it is to fire Robertson are the first ones to demand christians have the right to fire gays. And somehow gays are supposed to be the intolerant ones for not liking being compared to terrorists and beastiality.

Joseph Singer

December 23rd, 2013

In case no one noticed all this is just about money! Because all this press is great for them it will cause A&E’s advertising rates to go up. It’s definitely a win-win for A&E. A&E could give a chit whether Robertson has anything in particular to offer. He’s making money for them. This the marathon. If DD is at the end that’s why they’re doing the marathon so that they can get the last bit of money out of this “found” show. Doesn’t matter whether he’s a homophobic douchebag. He’s making money for them. That’s what they care about.

Neon Genesis

December 23rd, 2013

I’m much more bothered by all the extremely racist comments Phil Robertson has made about blacks and the Japanese that apparently his Christian fans must be perfectly ok with.


December 24th, 2013

Neon: they pretty well have to ignore the racist comments. Doing otherwise makes it too hard to laud the anti-gay ones.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.