Indiana House amends marriage ban bill

Timothy Kincaid

January 27th, 2014

The Indiana House of Representatives has voted to amend the anti-gay marriage ban to remove the second sentence:

Only a marriage between one (1) man and one (1) woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Indiana. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized.

The vote to amend passed by a healthy majority, 52 to 43.

The House has not yet voted on the bill itself. But if it does pass both the House and Senate as amended, it cannot go before the voters until the next legislative session passes identical language. This means that the bill cannot go before voters on the November ballot.

UPDATE: 23 of the state’s 69 Republican reps and 29 of 31 Democratic reps voted to strip the second sentence.

Mark F.

January 27th, 2014

Well, a smart move for the Republicans. There was a better than fair chance the voters would reject the Amendment in its current form. They can now vote for the Amendment knowing that it won’t come before the voters for another 2 years. But by that time, it still may fail, assuming no big SCOTUS decision makes it moot.


January 27th, 2014

2 more years is a long time with this issue. If NOM et al. can’t get this through Indiana, I dont think they will last in their current form. I would formally predict they fold or get folded up into some other larger group.


January 27th, 2014

I thought that the “marriage-only” ban was what they were originally pushing in the first place- maybe I’m wrong.

bill johnson

January 27th, 2014

Markanthony, I think you’re right. Indiana was going to NOM “victory” of the year, if they can’t get it passed then their relevance is really in question.

I would also note that during this critical time for the proposed amendment Brian Brown isn’t even in Indiana but rather is out in Utah for a rally that is frankly pointless. Why should donors even bother giving money to NOM when NOM’s leader is attending a meaningless rally in a state where the matter is in federal courts instead of being on the ground in a state where the issue could go to the ballot? If there is no role for Brian Brown to play in Indiana then there is no reason for NOM to exist.


January 27th, 2014

Matt: You were wrong.

Sir Andrew

January 27th, 2014

@Matt: There was more to the amendment. It forbade anything that looked like a marriage that was between other than a man/woman. It also banned the legislature or people from approving civil unions ever in the future (which would have killed this amendment in the Supreme Court anyway).

This is the start of the last gasps of the anti-marriage equality forces. Even NOM has recognized this and has now broadened their mandate to include ALL pro-gay bills of any sort. They are linking with other groups that share the goal of forcing all of us back into our closets even as all of our rights are reversed. As Bugs would say, “What a bunch of maroons.”


January 28th, 2014

@ Sir Andrew: Since we’re on the subject of ridiculing NOM (well, at least I am):

Albert Pujols, the Dominican-born MLB pitcher and a devout Christian, …

Eli Manning, (who hardly needs an introduction as to his professional talents), …

(Italics mine.) Pujols was the best baseball player of the ’00s; he’s the one who needs no introduction, and certainly not one calling him a pitcher (he’s a first-baseman/designated hitter–the very opposite of a pitcher). Manning, on the other hand, has never ever been the best quarterback (much less the best football player) for even a single season.

Stay hip, NOM!


January 28th, 2014

@SirAnthony/occono- glad to be wrong in this instance. Oddly enough I lived in Indiana from 1998-2007, and the same people in the state legislature spent all that time trying to push through the same amendment on an “on again, off again” basis. They’d pass it one year, fail to pass it the next year, let it lapse for a bit, bring it back, etc., so I guess it’s easy to lose track after all that time.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.