Box Turtle Bulletin

Box Turtle BulletinNews, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
“Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife…”
This article can be found at:
Latest Posts

Uganda’s Inter-Religious Council Calls On Government to Revisit Anti-Homosexuality Act

Jim Burroway

March 14th, 2014

While the rest is outraged over Uganda’s passage of the Anti-Homosexuality Act which imposes lifetime imprisonment for LGBT people and lengthy prison sentences for their supporters, the controversy inside Uganda is being augmented over a recently passed Anti-Pornography Act, which, according to reports (caveat: I haven’t seen the text of the Act itself), allegedly bans women from wearing miniskirts. This has led to a number of mob assaults on women throughout the country who are seen wearing clothing that others perceive to be in violation of the law. In many of these cases, the women have been forcibly stripped of their clothing in public.

YouTube Preview Image

This is just part of the background behind a letter from the Inter-Religious Council of Uganda that appeared in yesterday’s Daily Monitor, Uganda’s largest independent newspaper. The letter from the Council’s General Secretary calls on the government to revisit the Anti-Pornography Act somewhat in passing while arguing for major changes to the Anti-Homosexuality Act.

The Inter-religious Council of Uganda would like to comment on the homosexuality and pornography debate particularly the anti-homosexuality and anti-pornography laws.

Having studied the two laws in detail, we have come to the conclusion that the laws actually seek to protect the moral fibre of our society by stopping recruitment and promotion of homosexual acts, and indecent behaviour.

In our earlier statements on the Anti-Homosexuality Bill, we demonstrated availability of evidence to prove that recruitment into and promotion of homosexuality was indeed taking place in some of our schools and society as a whole, and this was targeting mainly young people.

However, we discovered that a number of clauses in the laws could be subject of abuse. For example: Section 2 of the Anti-Homosexuality Act is too broad as it talks about incriminating someone on the basis of “touching a person of the same sex with the motive of having sex with them”. The interpretation of “touch” is subjective, and may imply that anyone can be accused of homosexuality and fail to defend himself.

Section 13 of the same Act stipulates that it is an offence for “any person to use electronic devices (internet, films and mobile phones) for purposes of abetting or promoting homosexuality. The problem here is that if a person/media house writes an article trying to show homosexuality as ‘natural’ then he/she commits an offence earning a stiff penalty to either the individual or the media house.

In light of the above, we propose the following:

Parliament revisits certain provisions in the Act, especially those relating to punishment of offenders. Our view, which is informed by pastoral considerations and our earlier position in which we advised government to drop certain provisions in the then Bill, is that the sentences prescribed for homosexual acts must be proportional to the gravity of such acts.

Government stops the media from publishing names of persons it purports to be homosexuals, or promoting homosexuality in Uganda. Politicians and sections of religious leaders also stop using inflammatory language in the debate on homosexuality. Government also revisits the Anti-Pornography law in light of recent attacks of women.

Government provides clear frameworks for implementation of both laws.

Government dialogues with the donor community on the looming suspension of aid to our country.

We condemn any unlawful acts of mob justice against perceived offenders, and appeal to you to embrace such persons with love and compassion as we search together answers to the issues at hand.

The Inter-Religious Council is a coalition of Ugandan Roman Catholic, Anglican, Muslim, Christian Orthodox and Seventh-Day Adventist faith leaders. It’s unclear how much influence the Council wields in government or in society however. When the Anti-Homosexuality Bill was first proposed in Parliament in 2009, the Inter-Religious Council debated the bill and many of its members gave it their full backing, although many questioned the death penalty provision in the original bill. But by the following spring, the Inter-Religious Council softened its support for the bill.

Norway, Demark, the Netherlands, which collectively had provided $27 million in aid to Uganda, announced that they are cutting aid to the Ugandan government. Sweden announced that they were cutting just a little over $1 million in direct government-to-goverment aid, but was continuing to provide aid to non-govermental programs. Two weeks ago, the World Bank said it was delaying a $90 million loan to Uganda’s health service. And yesterday, unconfirmed reports emerged that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was delaying an unspecified portion of an estimated $2.3 million grant to Uganda’s Ministry of Health.

The interruption in foreign aid appears to have gotten the Council’s attention. While much of the suspension has been focused on direct aid to the Ugandan Government, it’s almost certain that many of the faith-based charities in Uganda are also beginning to feel the pinch.

Comments

POST COMMENT | COMMENT RSS 2.0

Jay
March 14th, 2014 | LINK

These stupid people have let the genie out of the bottle. Who knows what other outrages will occur. Count me not surprised.

Leonardo Ricardo
March 14th, 2014 | LINK

You know I wasn’t going to use the word STUPID (it was the first one that came into my mind) after reading the inter-religiouslike-nonsense…but, since Jay used it too, I think it’s valid!

STUPID
Deadly
Outcasting
Dishonest
INSANE

but most of all, these thick headed, self-righteous bigots (some are thieves) STILL would persecute and prosecute fellow citizens for simply being their LGBTI family members, coworkers, everyday friends. I think it TRUE and frightening that these knuckle-heads are very spiritually and emotionally SICK and after reality sets in, WE will need to send funds to rehabilitate THEM!

SharonB
March 14th, 2014 | LINK

So, is Uganda a civilized country?
sheesh.
Keep religious fanatics away from power!

Nathaniel
March 14th, 2014 | LINK

Is there any sign that concerns might also come from impending and likely court challenges that risk striking down the whole law when some simple revisions might make it more constitutionally palatable? I know, in the US, a great deal of effort is put into making controversial bills pass constitutional muster (like abortion bills that ban abortion clinics without actually saying they are banning abortion clinics), so it would make sense to me for people to start back-peddling when a law they favor might be struck down by the Judicial branch. On the other hand, how much of the law could they dump before it resembles the laws that were already in place?

Lord_Byron
March 14th, 2014 | LINK

Oh just so nice of them. They are only worried about the punishment. They totally do not care that adults are being prosecuted for something innate.

grantdale
March 14th, 2014 | LINK

Don’t they know lying is a sin?

We “discovered”, when in fact they and individual members have long supported the damn thing; excluding the death penalty. Here is but one example:

“The Anti-Homosexuality Bill

Last week Parliament passed the Anti-homosexuality Bill, yet to be accented to by His Excellency the President. The Council of Presidents would like to congratulate Parliament for passing this bill that will go a long way in promoting spiritual, moral and ethical values of our society. However, our religious teachings promote love, respect, compassion, and sensitivity of individuals and groups. We shall therefore continue to pray for the gays, lesbians and their promoters for their transformation, and also to respect the will of Ugandans. On our part as religious leaders, we shall provide and also advocate for establishment of more centers for guidance and counselling, and provision of social services to the survivors and perpetuators of gay activities in the country.”

http://www.ircu.or.ug/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=221:end-of-year-2013-statement-&catid=41:latest-news&Itemid=50

grantdale
March 14th, 2014 | LINK

And the one I was trying to find, from only 1 month ago… (dated Feb 2014) .. with even a supporting reference to Nigeria.

http://www.newvision.co.ug/newvision_cms/newsimages/file/irc-02-08.jpg

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.