June 9th, 2014
About 10,000 Texas Republicans wrapped up their annual convention in Fort Worth this weekend to approve a new platform for the 2016 elections. Things looked promising at first, when the Dallas Voice reported that the party had stripped a statement from their proposed platform proclaiming: “We affirm that the practice of homosexuality tears at the fabric of society and contributes to the breakdown of the family unit. Homosexual behavior is contrary to the fundamental, unchanging truths that have been ordained by God, recognized by our country’s founders, and shared by the majority of Texans.”
Whatever good news that represented evaporated when a new plank on homosexuality surfaced:
Homosexuality must not be presented as an acceptable alternative lifestyle, in public policy, nor should family be redefined to include homosexual couples. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior, regardless of state of origin.
Additionally, we oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose homosexuality out of faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values. We recognize the legitimacy and value of counseling which offers reparative therapy and treatment to patients who are seeking escape from the homosexual lifestyle. No laws or executive orders shall be imposed to limit or restrict access to this type of therapy.
The Texas Republican Party approved that platform over the weekend.
The enshrinement of ex-gay therapy into the official agenda of the Texas Republican Party goes against the recommendations of every legitimate mental and medical health professional organization in America, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychoanalytic Association, and the American School Counselors Association.
The platform also opposes same-sex marriage, as well as “the recognition of and granting of benefits to people who represent themselves as domestic partners without being legally married.”
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
David in the O.C.
June 9th, 2014
This last part really clarifies who these people are:
“…as well as “the recognition of and granting of benefits to people who represent themselves as domestic partners without being legally married.â€
In other words, this has nothing to do with the so-called protection of marriage, and everything to do with anti-gay hatred.
patrick
June 9th, 2014
Separation of church and state?
SharonB
June 9th, 2014
This is what the Tea Party does to the brain, people.
So every time you see that piss-colored rag of rebellion plastered on a car or truck rolling down the highway (especially in Texas), you know the beliefs of the occupants!
Nathaniel
June 9th, 2014
David, I read that statement as targeting unmarried heterosexuals. While the statement would certainly include gay people, it is not, as Jim presents it, restricted to such. The final sum would be : we oppose letting gays marry, and we oppose giving rights to ANY couple that isn’t actually married (because they are all filthy sinners and need to be spanked).
Bose in St. Peter MN
June 9th, 2014
As fraudulent and abusive as SOCE therapy is, it’s still a wonder that Texas GOPers are being defrauded into believing that the anti-gay stuff will be good for their party.
How much less welcome can they make their state to the un- and under-employed (exploding numbers of minimum wage jobs), women (access to self-directed health care), the uninsured (offensively little access to Medicaid) and educators (forcing the teaching of creationism during science class)? Pissing on LGBT folks specifically, and reasonable thinkers generally, is just frosting on the cake.
And in case that isn’t enough, a bonus: If bad science wrongly convicts you of murdering your own children in Texas, count on your governor to subvert any credible evidence arising later to ensure your execution and the cover-up that follows.
Merv
June 9th, 2014
This will serve them well in Texas, where the electorate is extremely religious and bigoted.
Joseph Singer
June 9th, 2014
It’s Texas. You were expecting something different?
Despite the state’s designation (Tejas) it’s anything but friendly
Lord_Byron
June 9th, 2014
And not surprisingly we only get silence from groups like GOProud
Steve
June 9th, 2014
@Nathaniel
That doesn’t make it any better. That the US discriminates relatively heavily against unmarried straight couples should be fixed as well. There are way too many rights and benefits that are tied to marriage, but shouldn’t and needn’t be.
ebohlman
June 9th, 2014
There’s also a plank in there supporting the “right” of parents to refuse to vaccinate their children for any reason at all, so we have at least two endorsements of medical quackery.
Leave A Comment