LGBT activist wins Nevada house nomination

Timothy Kincaid

June 13th, 2014


Lauren Scott is the executive director of Equality Nevada and a leading advocate for civil rights issues in the state. She is also a government consultant and serves on the Equal Rights Commission.

She is now also her party’s candidate for Nevada Assembly District 30.

The Republican Party, that is (gaystarnews)

Scott received 58% of the vote over rival Republican primary candidate Adam Khan who only received the support of 42% of party members.

Khan had been endorsed by the Nevada Republican Assembly but Scott received endorsement from Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval in her bid to be the candidate.

Sandoval appointed Scott to Nevada’s Equal Rights Commission in 2012 and she also helped found the group Equality Nevada.

Scott brings with her extensive military service and a devotion to the state. Scott had been a Democrat until 2011, but her passion for economic development and job creation – and the nature of Nevada politics – suggested that she’d be more effective as a Republican.

Should she win, she will make history. Lauren Scott will be Nevada’s first transgender legislator.

Paul Douglas

June 13th, 2014

Love to vote for her if I lived in Nevada, but I just cannot bring myself to cast a ballot for someone with an “R” after their name. I’ve seen our queer community burned and screwed over maliciously by the republicons for 40+ years and it will take some abject apologizing and a lot of very public repentance by these God’s Own Party clowns to change that for me.

The Lauderdale

June 13th, 2014

Individuals may repent/change/show sense. Parties elide or revise their histories.

Chris McCoy

June 13th, 2014

Paul Douglas wrote:

it will take some abject apologizing and a lot of very public repentance by these God’s Own Party clowns to change that for me.

How do you expect things to change if you resist said change at every opportunity?
It’s almost as if you’re saying to the GOP “Stop being nice to me. You’re supposed to be mean, and I won’t accept anything other than meanness because that’s what I expect.”


June 13th, 2014

Because Republicans have been so awesome at creation jobs. What nonsense.

Priya Lynn

June 13th, 2014

Republicans have done everything they possibly could to block job creation, eliminate government jobs, and harm the U.S. econonmy. And then the blame the economy on Obama.


June 14th, 2014

Republicans have taken a crap on the dining room table cloth, and then blamed Obama because he can’t get all of the stain out.

Not all Republicans hate me, but everyone who hates me is a Republican.

-Pretty much how I see it.

Timothy Kincaid

June 16th, 2014


It’s takes time and effort to analyze situations, understand issues, and determine what policies are best. It’s much much easier to hate a party and vote against its members – which is what pretty much drives our political system right now.

Even if one knows that the other party has a more knowledgeable and competent candidate, voting for him could cause a disruption to the ease of voting party line, so many people will knowingly vote for the fool and the scoundrel. (which is how Bob Filner got elected)

But when the realities of what that party loyalty is based on changes, that is the most difficult time of all – it questions the basis of their party loyalty and makes one wonder whether perhaps there are other party-loyal policies that may require a new look. And then you’re back to analysis and research and issues and policies and it’s all just easier to find a reason to hate.

Should the Republican Party become pro-gay to any extent, this will cause some true discomfort to some gay people. Take away the ‘reason’ to hate all Republicans, then you’re left with a hate without reason.

Some will reconsider other policies and candidates that Republicans propose – once they are absent of anti-gay animus – and perhaps accept some or reject them based on their analysis. But I suspect that most will come up with other reasons to hate the party. It’s easier.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.