June 11th, 2015
In May the North Carolina legislature passed Senate Bill 2, a bill designed to allow individual Magistrates to give up conducting marriages and to allow assistant Registrars to give up issuing marriage licenses. Republican Governor Pat McCrory vetoed the bill, saying that public officials who swear to perform the duties of their office should not be exempt from doing so.
On June 2nd, the state Senate voted to override the Governor’s veto and today the House did the same. So the bill becomes law.
Here’s what it does:
While this is seen as an affront to our community, it is not clear that it will have much real impact on same-sex couples seeking marriage. The provisions require that licenses be issued and marriages be conducted and it probably matters little whether any specific Magistrates or Assistant Register of Deeds individually participate.
And it should be noted that the state has been issuing marriage licenses and conducting marriages since October 2014, and things appear to be going smoothly. I suspect that the offices of the various Registers of Deeds and Magistrates have by now pretty much identified ways to comply with the law without any serious loss of religious freedom or significant inconvenience to marrying parties. I doubt much will change.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
MattNYC
June 11th, 2015
Window dressing. Doesn’t really do anything but they can be on record as not sitting idly by while equality reigned.
Nathaniel
June 11th, 2015
http://news.nhcgov.com/news-releases/2015/06/statement-from-nhc-register-of-deeds-tammy-beasley-regarding-todays-nc-house-override-of-the-governors-veto-of-sb2/
Mark F.
June 11th, 2015
It’s stupid and wrong, but as you note, it really doesn’t actually do much. Of course, that won’t stop various people from the sort of absurd overreaction we normally get from the anti-gay side. “Why, next thing you know, North Carolina will be feeding gays to the lions!” “Move out od the state while you can!'” etc.
CPT_Doom
June 11th, 2015
I just want the magistrates who choose this option to be “named and shamed.” They have to live in these communities and should be treated with the disrespect they practice.
etseq
June 12th, 2015
This isn’t just about same sex marriage – bill allows for basically ANY religious objection so inter-racial, interfaith, divorced people, etc. Also, since the state isn’t allowed to question the sincerity of the objection, basically any magistrate or judge can opt-out for any reason so the state has basically incentivized public employees to opt for reduced job responsibilities with no down side. As for the suggestion that this will all be handled behind the scenes with no disruption, maybe in the few major counties with large offices but in rural areas, these offices are usually staffed with 1-2 people max so in these counties it will be a logistical nightmare. Even though the statute says the state has to provide a floater magistrate to cover counties where employees have opted out, the bill did not appropriate any funds for these mystery magistrates and because NC has become a libertarian paradise under the radical republicans these last few years, state budgets and taxes have been slashed so even basic state government services are increasingly difficult to sustain. Finally, this bill will most likely never go into effect because the Democratic House Leader has already indicated that his caucus will seek a preliminary injunction based solely on the machinations the Republican speaker of the house used to manipulate the votes required to override the veto. The trick the Speaker used has apparently been tried in the past and the NC Supreme Court has ruled it unconstitutional due to certain quorum procedures in the state constitution. Also, the ACLU has indicated they will probably bring a suit in federal court.
Leave A Comment