Hutcherson’s Plan For Microsoft: A Hostile “Christian” Takeover

Jim Burroway

November 16th, 2007

So we already told you about Pastor Ken Hutcherson’s bluster before Microsoft shareholders last Tuesday, where he threatened the company with a “firestorm” if they don’t change their nondiscrimination policies. Hutcherson was later reminded hat Microsoft’s policies were affirmed by 97 percent of the shareholders last year. So what’s a Watchman to do?

Well it looks like Hutcherson wants to take over Microsoft by packing it with new shareholders who will vote Hutcherson’s way. So let’s see… There are about 9.35 billion shares of Microsoft stock outstanding. And since stock is hovering around $34 per share, that represents a market capitalization of some $318 billion. For a man who can’t even collect enough signatures in two attempts to get an innitiative placed on the Washington state ballot to overturn that state’s anti-discrimination laws, that looks like a pretty tall order.

Timothy Kincaid

November 16th, 2007

Oh it’s not THAT much of an investment. He only need to control half of the voting shares. That would only be $159 billion. I’m sure his “host of powerful white people” can just write a check.

Maybe the nation of Latvia will buy up Microsoft for him. Or maybe not. The gross domestic product for the Nation of Latvia is only about $20 billion.

Hmmm… maybe we could ask Bill Gates to buy the nation of Latvia instead.

Steve - Geneva, IL

November 16th, 2007

He may be an idiot, but he’s no dummy. Lets say he starts a fundraising drive and raises 0.001% (1 one thousandth percent) of the $159 billion that he needs. Thats $1.59 million dollars. He may not even get that much, but I’m sure he can scrape up a few hundred thousand dollars doing this. How come I can never think of this stuff? I still have to work an honest job for a living!


November 17th, 2007

I always wondered why the culture warriors have never used this tactic.I have listened to them moan and whine for over 50 years.It has always been one thing or another.Depending on the day it could be TV,movie studios,liberal newspapers,book publishers,or elite universities.Many of these businesses have changed hands many times.I have always felt that if you didn’t like their product you were free to buy them and turn them in any direction you want.The only problem they face is that even a wowser with money is not that stupid.The wowsers want control without putting up the required cash that it would take to control these businesses.It makes no sense to buy a chain of newspapers and then run the company into the ground.I can see it now.Microsoft run by graduates of theological diploma mills.

Ben in Oakland

November 17th, 2007

This is SO obvious!!! All he has to do is ask god for the money. I’m sure it’s on god’s agenda, and besides, god has more money than, well, god!!!!

Here is the real problem with our ocuntry in a nutshell. Idiots supporting idiots iwth idiotic agendas.


November 17th, 2007


I would suggest that Hutcherson has very little support, and that is why his initiatives keep failing. There is also no way for him to raise enough money to buy Microsoft. Perhaps he is planning to be a modern Don Quixote tilting at Microsoft.

Idiots may be supporting idiots with idiotic agendas, but they don’t seem to be heavily supporting this one.


November 17th, 2007


I don’t know how th Christian faith is going to survive megalomaniacal morons like Hutcherson and Robertson, et. al. These guys make Jesus look like an idiot with their words and actions.



Bill Ware

November 17th, 2007

Hutcherson is suffering from egomania, that’s for sure. He doesn’t seem to realize how he is embarrassing himself through antics like this.

Just a technical note:

“Hutcherson was later reminded that Microsoft’s policies were affirmed by 97 percent of the shareholders last year.”

This might be better stated:

Hutcherson was later reminded that Microsoft’s policies were affirmed by shareholders controlling 97 percent of Microsoft stock last year.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.