14 responses

  1. Boo
    April 4, 2008

    Wow. Guy can’t even add. 29+38 is 67, not 77.

    Don’t you hate it when junk math messes up perfectly good junk science?

  2. Fannie
    April 4, 2008

    Since all of these (misused) “statistics” pertaining to how “homosexuality is physically harmful” refer to gay men and butt sex, it’s clear that there is no problem with being a lesbian.

    Yessss!

    But seriously, disregarding for a moment the reprehensibility of NARTH’s use of junk science to spread lies about gay men, what’s the “problem” with lesbians? Has NARTH forgotten us, or are we just not as “threatening” as gay men?

  3. Loki
    April 4, 2008

    Fannie,

    It’s funny you ask because I came up with a theory recently after reading Townhall and other anti-gay news sites and the comments left by their readers. I think they have a hard time with lesbians because as straight males, lesbians mainly do what they would do sexually to a women, although according to my lesbian friends, not as well. It is hard to condone a sex act when it is one you would do yourself if you could, while easy for them to see two men and say, I would never do THAT.

    The commenters easily condemn gay make sex, but are OK with lesbians as long as they are only “experimenting” and end up married to a “real” man or are willing to include them.

    Just my thoughts on the subject.

  4. TJ McFisty
    April 4, 2008

    “Has NARTH forgotten us, or are we just not as “threatening” as gay men?”

    Oh no, Fannie…what you laaadies do is hot hot hhhhhot! Yowza!

    Well, that’s what they think.

  5. Fannie
    April 4, 2008

    “Oh no, Fannie…what you laaadies do is hot hot hhhhhot! Yowza!”

    Yeah, as long as it’s not two butch lesbians. They would probably have to be cured.

    ;-)

  6. TJ McFisty
    April 4, 2008

    They have no idea what you’re talking about.

    “Oh, you mean that dude that came over and did that bang up fixit on my sink/car/train? Man, he was something el–OH! A woman! Huh! Wow. Well, she sure knew her way around a belt sander…that’s fer sure! Heh, heh.”

    There ya go! Butch lesbians don’t have sex. They bowl and fix things. Don’t even register a blip on their radar.

  7. bls
    April 4, 2008

    He doesn’t know what he’s talking about anyway. Women get infections from ordinary intercourse all the time – and of course until quite recently in history they often died in childbirth.

    These arguments are totally without foundation – and always from the male point of view, please notice.

  8. Joel
    April 4, 2008

    Miss Republican Kern is a female bls…

    I know of another title for this post that might just work:
    “Another personal experience fuels the propagation of NARTH”
    Does his son aid his father in this quest?

  9. bls
    April 4, 2008

    “Stephen Graham” is, I’m sure, a man – and he is the topic here. I don’t see anything about Kern here, so I’m not sure why you’re bringing her up. I’m referring to this post, no other.

  10. grantdale
    April 5, 2008

    SoL: The objective of the “gay” lifestyle is easy, quick, shallow, fake sex with no strings attached.

    Damn. I sure messed that up, didn’t I? I’ve got more strings attached than a, urgh, umm, sticky string thingy in a string factory on string day.

    And I’m not sure how one measures such matters… but… no “deep sex” allowed. That’s a rule?

    I don’t remember it being on the form when I joined up but, then again, I never do read the fine print. It’s probably buried, but not deeply buried, somewhere from about page 42 onwards.

    Unfortunately I’ve already given the toaster away to a homeless shelter, but where do I send the membership badge and uniform back to?

    (all I’ve got is the P.O. Box in Michigan that they posted my copy of “The Gay Agenda” from.)

  11. Yuki Choe
    April 5, 2008

    “Q: Doesn’t heterosexual sex carry the same physical risks as homosexual sex?

    A: No, none, if there is abstinence before marriage, and fidelity and healthy, normal sexual intercourse in marriage.”

    This is strange. I am sure any gay can abstain from sex before marriage, be faithful and healthy, and have normal sexual intercourse in marriage too. But it cannot be proven, and we all know why, homosexuals are not even ALLOWED to look forward to marriage. Talk about risks when there are none.

  12. Stephen
    April 8, 2008

    “… what’s the “problem” with lesbians? Has NARTH forgotten us, or are we just not as “threatening” as gay men?”

    Women don’t count, as they’re not really human … (/sarcasm)

  13. blob
    June 11, 2008

    You should know. Belinda Jensen is Stephen Graham’s sister-in-law.

  14. Timothy Kincaid
    June 11, 2008

    thanks blob… that does make this easier to understand.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Back to top
mobile desktop