Rick Warren To Deliver Invocation at Inauguration

Jim Burroway

December 17th, 2008

The New York Times’ Katharine Seelye is reporting that Rick Warren, the pastor at Saddleback Church, has been chosen by President-elect Barack Obama to deliver the invocation at the inaugural ceremony.

This is the same Rick Warren who recently said that the relationships of his “many gay friends” are no different from child rape, incest or polygamy. He also jumped on the paranoia bandwagon surrounding same-sex marriage by falsely claiming that Prop 8’s failure somehow would have overturned the Constitution’s First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and religion. (It can’t. No law or state constitution can.).

Warren himself has acknowledged that the only difference between himself and Focus On the Family’s James Dobson is just “a matter of tone.”  So given President-elect Obama’s stated commitment to bringing the country together, it’s hard to fathom the reasoning behind choosing such a divisive figure. What’s worse, this decision to include Warren revives memories of the controversy surrounding ex-gay advocate Donnie McClurkin’s partication in an Obama campaign event in South Carolina during the primaries. This announcement will certainly be taken as another punch in the gut.

More details and reactions to follow, I’m sure. You can count on it.

Update: Are you looking for someone to email to express your outrage? Well, a well-placed source just provided these email addresses:

You can also contact Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office. She chaired the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies and made the announcement.

Update: People for the American Way respond.

Rick

December 17th, 2008

How very craptastic.

Rick

December 17th, 2008

Thank you Jim. I’ve contacted the five on the list and used some of the information you cited recently to express why Rick Warren is a profoundly inappropriate choice. I also contacted Feinstein’s office to ask her how she could be part of such a stupendously wrong-headed selection.

Timothy Kincaid

December 17th, 2008

Warren is a choice of the popular over the respected.

If Obama wants to lend gravity and credibility to the process, I’d recommend Rev. Peter Gomes, the chaplain of Harvard. He’s a perfect choice. Gomes is African-American, a Baptist, and unabashedly gay (though celibate). His theology is challenging to conservative and liberal alike and calls on believers to pay as much attention to the teachings of Jesus as they do to the celebration of his birth.

But before the conservatives could whip up any fury about a liberal pro-homosexual agenda, Gomes has already provided the invocation at the inaugurations of Ronald Reagan and George Dubya Bush.

Or alternately he might consider someone from his own faith, the United Church of Christ. No homophobes there.

UMJeremy

December 17th, 2008

Sent. May their future actions listen more to that still small voice and the ache in their gut…rather than the glitter and glam of political opportunism.

rusty

December 17th, 2008

my brief note in the email to the five listed by jim

I became aware of the selection of Rick Warren to lead the Inaugural events by way of delivering the Invocation. I am truly disheartened, disgusted with this news, and am calling for a more suitable person to lead the invocation of President-Elect Obama. I know that I am just one of many expressing the heart-wrenching angst that has been stirred with the announcement of Brother Warren to be sharing the stage with OHB.

PSUdain

December 17th, 2008

I threw in my two cents to each of them. Thanks for the addresses, and the reference material.

Thanks also to Timothy for the Gomes thought. There’s still an interview with him that I have on my iPod that I keep meaning to listen to.

john ozed

December 17th, 2008

A great big THANKS to Timothy Kincaid! I just saw a video of Rev Gomes and found him quite brilliant, and I’m an atheist.

I’m still mighty upset about Rick Warren, and I’ve written the names that BTB suggested.

If they drop Rick Warren then Rev. Peter Gomes should immediately go to the top of the list. Though ideally, why mention ‘god’ at all?

I had no idea that he was the invoker at Reagan and Bush2’s inaugurations, I can only hope he’s not bad luck.

John

December 17th, 2008

I sent a message to Feinstein and the Obama folks telling them just how betrayed I feel by this choice. I was really looking forward to this Inauguration. I thought it might be as inspiring as the Kennedy Inaugurtion that occurred before I was born. Now, I have no interest in the event. The Obama folks have no idea how angry so maany of still are.

What a way to ruin what should be a great historic event for all of us.

Patrick M

December 17th, 2008

Thanks for the email addresses. Have sent a strong letter off.

Another useful one is the press team at press@ptt.gov.

I love Gomes, and thought he would be a perfect choice. Warren is more than a slap in the face, it is an assault on my dignity.

Hank

December 17th, 2008

I sent a message too to the addresses provided above. Thanks. This is truly unbelievable!

I cannot express how disappointed I am at the selection of Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at Mr. Obama’s inauguration.
I had been hopeful of the promise of unity and our country moving in a new direction, but now I see that I was deceived yet again.
This is a total betrayal. I urge you to reconsider and select someone who lives up to the principles that Mr. Obama claimed to hold during his campaign.

babyming

December 17th, 2008

I sympathize with those who are horrified by Warren’s anti-gay hatred. May I also point out that Warren also fights tooth and nail against stem-cell research, and a few months ago, I lost a loved one to a long illness, which might have taken a different course had Bush not slowed down stem-cell research in August 2001.

Obama missed a chance to show LEADERSHIP: reaching out to as many people as possible, but not to anti-gay haters and anti-science know-nothings. Like Sarah Palin, Obama has encouraged ignorance, when he should have set a better example. I like Obama and I wish him well, but there is no good that will come from his selection of Rick Warren.

Bob King

December 17th, 2008

Graphictruth: Obama’s Inaugural Fuckup

There’s even more significant dirt on Warren than his anti-gay rhetoric – and it comes from real, very conservative Christians.

Not that Anti-gay, anti-choice issues insignificant, but in Warren’s case, they are symptomatic of a moral disease that has “purposely driven” his career; a far more loathsome disease that disqualifies him as both a Christian – and a Citizen.

He should not be permitted on the stage with Obama.

Arthur

December 18th, 2008

And there is the problem of creating another Billy Graham, boosting a national figure who will trade on the relationship on a national media scale. Many of us of a quieter, less showy, faith in this country are tired of seeing the media preachers given more media by the government.

werdna

December 18th, 2008

A recent post at Pam’s House Blend suggests we also contact

Emmett Beliveau, the executive director/CEO of the Inaugural Committee: 202-203-1715; emmett@pic2009.org

oakland753

December 18th, 2008

Timothy, I like your idea that Obama select someone from his own United Church of Christ for the invocation. I think Dr. Jo Hudson, the Pastor of the Cathedral of Hope in Dallas, Texas, would be a great pick. She is very cordial and is the only woman pastor of a congregation in that part of Texas. The church is the largest gay congregation in the world and I believe the third or fourth largest in the entire United Church of Christ denomination. See http://www.cathedralofhope.com for more on her.

oakland753

December 18th, 2008

It seems it is not useful to contact Feinstein unless you live in California. Here is the automated response I just received to my email I sent as a Florida resident. I assume this means not only do I not get a response to my email, but it is not even read by anyone because it did not contain a California address…anyone care to loan me your address. hahahaha!

Thank you for sending me your electronic mail message. I appreciate your taking the time to share your thoughts with me.

Because of the volume of e-mail that is received by my office, we can only respond to email that includes a California postal address. Please resend the text of your e-mail message, including your postal address, and I will respond to you as soon as possible.

truthynesslover

December 18th, 2008

Warren is a wise political choice.The more that people see and hear obama the more comfortable they become with him.By choosing warren he will be getting a much larger audience than if he had just picked a typical liberal preacher.It is those people we need to reach many of whom probable didnt and dont want a black man in the whitehouse,never mind the bigotry against gays.Is everything always about you?

Timothy Kincaid

December 18th, 2008

A few other choices:

Tono Compolo: liberal evangelical. Thinks gays should be celibate but if not then they should be monogamous (it may be sin, but it’s better socially) though he opposes marriage.

Albert Mohler: I’m putting an extreme choice here to make my point. Mohler is a dedicated anti-gay activist. He writes regularly in opposition to gay equality. But I don’t think Mohler has ever equated gay couples to pedophiles, polygamists, or the incestuous.

Just how friggin hard is it to find someone – even someone religiously conservative – who hasn’t spouted insanely offensive homophobia in the past six months? REALLY

Maurice Lacunza

December 18th, 2008

I sent Obama’s people an email suggesting that they could offer prayer napkins blessed by Rick’s church. I thought $25 would be a reasonable donation for that. I don’t know though; what would an evangelical person donate for an Obama napkin invocated and blessed by Rick Warren?

I just had this thought: Maybe Jerry Falwell could sneeze up from middle earth and plop some of his santorum on the napkin. Wait…I am on to something…maybe have TWO napkins…

OMG, I have a second thought: Texan preachers lately are selling all kinds of napkins. Lets call Texas and get the whole crowd there.

Obama, Obama, Obama, What aileth thee to make such an irrational decision?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.