The Newer, Gay-Friendlier Rick Warren (Same as the Old Rick Warren with new packaging)

Timothy Kincaid

December 23rd, 2008

Rick Warren has been criticized recently at Box Turtle Bulletin for doing and saying some pretty disgusting things about gay couples recently. Our scrutiny increased after President-Elect Obama selected Warren to offer the invocation at his inauguration.

We were not alone in our criticism. The blogosphere, along with mainstream media, have run with the story (or at least part of it) challenging the Obama administration in its relationship with the gay community before he has even taken office and tarnishing the shiny-friendly image of Rick Warren’s brand of Evangelical Christianity.

So Rick Warren has taken his love show on the road. Over the past week he has been denying that he’s homophobic, laughing off complaints, declaring his civility, and chatting up Melissa Etheridge, and even changing his church’s website.

But sadly, most of Warren’s efforts have not been directed at healing the hurt he has caused. Instead he seeks to defend himself and dismiss the concerns of the community.

On Monday, Warren posted to his church’s website a video in which he purports to clarify his statements and give perspective. He does state in the video that he does not think that gay relationships are the moral equivalent of incest or pedophilia or polygamy.

But mostly it’s just a denunciation of journalists and bloggers and anyone else who dare criticize Rick Warren.

In the video he reimagines his interview with Beliefnet in which he compared gay couples to incest, polygamy, and pedophila. As he retells it, he also objected to unmarried couples living together and commonlaw partnerships.

This didn’t fly with Steve Waldman, the Beliefnet writer who interviewed Warren.

In his December 22 video Warren had an opportunity to do something quite straightforward and healing: clarify, take resonsibility and, ideally, apologize. He did clarify but did not, in my view, take responsibility. He could have simply said, “it came out in a way I didn’t mean and I apologize for those who I hurt because of that.” It wouldn’t have required him to back off his position on gay marriage one iota. Instead, he blamed the media and misremember or mischaracterized what he’d said.

Rick Warren is probably not an evil guy. And he probably doesn’t go about his day thinking of how to make the lives of gay people more difficult.

But Warren is like many preachers I have known. He is convinced that God has called him and that this entitles him to stand above criticism. He’s become accustomed to being a leader of his flock (at 22,000 an awfully large flock) and having his word equated with Gospel.

To Rick Warren, admitting that he has done others wrong is akin to admitting that God is wrong. And why should he back down? God is on his side.

Sadly, the history of Evangelicalism is full of those who were convinced that conquering their personal moral failings were secondary to God’s Work, who were certain that God performed as they declared, and who discovered that pride comes before a fall.

Rick Warren would be well served by publicly repenting for his sin against gay couples and seeking a life of humility in which criticism is weighed for its worth and complaints are not laughed away.

David C.

December 23rd, 2008

Rick Warren is exhibiting all the characteristics of a politician. He’s beginning to position himself as a power broker. Funny how the long arms of Obama extend as far right and left as they do. It’s the kind of reach that will allow him to make a start toward ending the Culture War, reestablishing confidence in markets, and bringing the whole country together to meet the increasingly complex challenges we face as a nation.

I think that by now nobody should be surprised that Obama selected this man to give the invocation at his inauguration. Obama has an instinct for politics that is lost on most progressive thinkers. Evangelicals played crucial roles in the setting of policy at key times in the last decade, and Obama would not be worthy of the office if he lacked the perspicacity to observe that he must start to open up a dialogue with them. Pulling in a charismatic with a large following is a good way to capture share in the marketplace of ideas. A lot of things have to change, and the more interests he can engage early and get pointed in the same direction, the sooner the divisions between them will simply disappear.

By jumping on the Warren selection for the inaugural invocation, progressives have in a number of ways called attention to the Rick Warren phenomenon. It’s no accident that Warren starts “cleaning up” his image. He’s preparing himself to assume the role of moderate leader and potential middle-man between Obama and the more ardently conservative evangelicals. This brings Obama squarely into the culture war as the commander in chief of the US to truce with those waging war to advance their short list of moral hot-button issues. Keep in mind these “issues” were enough to deliver Bush a second term in 2004 when Carl Rove successfully engineered a strategy to use gay marriage as a wedge. Obama has to be thinking in two-year increments and not overreaching while moving quickly to get the country back in operating condition.

Progressives are going to have to weigh in meaningfully after Obama becomes President. By then, the Warren participation in the inauguration will have played out, and they will need something substantiative to bring to the table they have finally gotten a seat at. That means understanding that the influence of spiritual leaders is currently playing a role in the development of policy both in the US and abroad.


December 24th, 2008

Can a leopard change it’s spots? This guy is such a megalomaniac that he will say anything to hold on to what he thinks is power. We are not Christophobes we are Rickophobes!
He’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing…and I’m waiting anxiously for his eventual public breakdown and confession to so horrible ‘sin’ he has committed in some sleezy hotel room.. He ‘doth protest too much’…
Is Obama strong enough to admit his mistake?
We do not want RICH/HARD WARren as our next nation pastor.

Craig L. Adams

December 25th, 2008

What you’re saying here about the way Rick Warren has responded to criticism rings true for me. In a way I hate to say that. I’m no big fan of Warren, but I like the idea of Obama reaching out to evangelical Christians, and Warren seems to be the most visible one around. But, that quote from Steve Waldman is right-on. It puts into words something I’ve been feeling about this for a while. Warren is defending himself and his ministry. And, that’s all.


December 25th, 2008

With Rick Warren in the National Spotlight, coupled with his feeble attempts to put a new spin on his ‘evangelical mission’, has been a true gift for the holidays.

Prop 8 is in the news again, GLBT folk have more press, and Obama is having the opportunity to bring more onto the fence of indecision.

Please, count our blessings. . .In biblical terms, Obama can give us the fish or we can take it upon ourselves to learn to fish. In other words, let’s not forget the lessons learned from the dismal Prop 8 Fiasco.


December 25th, 2008

‘this’ has been a true gift for the holidays. . .

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.