The Daily Agenda for Sunday, May 19
French President Hollande Signs Marriage Bill
The Daily Agenda for Saturday, May 18
Fox News Ignores Marriage Equality Wins
The Era of Civil Unions Is Coming To An End
Orthodox Priests Lead Violent Attack On LGBT Rights Rally in Tbilisi, Georgia
France's Marriage Equality Bill Clears Final Hurdle
The Daily Agenda for Friday, May 17
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Emily K
January 12th, 2009 | LINK
what do you mean, “sunk to?” this is pretty much party platform.
KZ
January 12th, 2009 | LINK
I believe there are fair-minded, fiscally conservative Republicans out there. The problem is it’s difficult for me to vote for them after watching this filth.
Jake
January 12th, 2009 | LINK
What was the supreme court decision? Lawrence v. Texas?
Lindoro
January 12th, 2009 | LINK
This comment was deleted due to violations to our comments policy.. Please, leave the profanity on the playground.
Lindoro, this is the third time we’ve deleted a comment of yours due to a clear violation of our comments policy.. We are placing you on moderation for the next two weeks. If this continues for a fourth time, you will be banned. Please familiarize yourself with our comments policy. We’ve put links to it all over the place, so it should be easy to find. — Jim B.
homer
January 13th, 2009 | LINK
Why should Huckabee or Coulter care about sodomy? They are the ultimate nosy next door neighbors.
AJD
January 13th, 2009 | LINK
That is one of the sickest things I’ve ever seen. I know that Mike Huckabee is a semi-closeted theocratic fascist, but the sight of he and Ann Coulter arguing over who is more or less “pro-sodomy” while the audience yucks it up is just disturbing.
I can’t just dismiss them as “nosy next-door neighbors.” Huckabee might run for president in 2012.
Where is this country going?
Joe
January 13th, 2009 | LINK
I think it’s amusing that they are arguing over a word, whose definition they probably don’t completely understand. “Sodomy” is leagally considered any sexual contact other than a penis going into a vagina. Oral sex=sodomy. Anal sex (heterosexual)= sodomy.
Best thing for me was Huckabee raising his hand and saying “scout’s honor,” and couldn’t even give the scout salute right. What happened to that part in the Scout Oath “to help other people at all times…?”
Houndentenor
January 13th, 2009 | LINK
Yes, this is what Republicans have come to. Actually they have been there for quite some time. They abandoned fiscal restraint and small government long ago and their only issues seem to be anti-gay and anti-abortion. That’s hardly an appealing party platform. What’s amazing is that after decades of carefully constructed PC statements to make anti-gay positions seem not anti-gay (“equal rights but not special rights” etc) they have dropped the mask. Similarly they are doing so on the issue of race. With the mask off they reveal their true ugly face.
I do think the GOP will regroup and win elections in the future, but they have to push people like Coulter and Huckabee to the sidelines in order to do that. With the moderates completely disgusted with the party that might take some time.
Timothy Kincaid
January 13th, 2009 | LINK
I don’t think that either Ann Coulter or Mike Huckabee speak for the Party. I seem to recall that he lost that election.
AJD
January 13th, 2009 | LINK
What worries me is that even if Huckabee runs in 2012 and loses, he’ll still manage to rile up a lot of the religious right. What will make things different is that for the time being, he has a forum on Fox News that allows him to bark his nonsense to a nationwide audience that is willing to swallow every word of it.
Maybe I’m just being paranoid, but I think we live in times more dangerous than a lot of us are willing to admit. All over the gay blogosphere, I see these comments that the religious right is just “desperate” and that they’ll soon disappear because time is on our side. I don’t think it’s that simple; if it were, then we would have had full equality a long time ago, not 30 states where we are constitutionally forbidden from marrying.
It’s worth pointing out that even Mussolini dismissed Hitler as a “silly little monkey” after they met in 1934, but we all know what happened within a few years.
Maybe we ought to start trying to get Fox to fire Huckabee and/or get more newspapers to drop Coulter’s column. Pressuring companies that advertise during Huckabee’s show might be a start.
cowboy
January 13th, 2009 | LINK
I have a feeling you’re not going to see Huckabee nor Coulter going away any time soon. Remember, there are people who still listen to Limbaugh even after his comments and his mocking actions about Michael J. Fox. That should have been the end of Limbaugh’s career in the media but it wasn’t.
As for what we should do? I say: the more we pick at the scab the longer it festers. Ignore these media hounds. They’re in it for the money and any publicity garners them more.
The trick is to somehow get something overwhelming negative associated with Huckabee or Coulter…the likes of what Don Imus had when he made sexist/racist statements on air. Maybe Coulter’s comment about single mothers will do it. And I do think Coulter is dangerously close to the edge of falling out of the public’s favor. The public’s need for Mike and Ann’s form of entertainment is finicky…
But, again, you have to steer away from giving these people any more publicity. They THRIVE on it. Once they have had a taste of notoriety, they want more. It’s an addiction and perhaps we should pity them.
I’ll stick to PBS shows if I can get my digital to analog converter hooked up before next month.
Leave A Comment