Update On Latest Ted Haggard Revelation

Jim Burroway

January 25th, 2009

Colorado Springs KRDO television reporter Tak Landrock appeared in a teaser of a report promising a full report on Monday about a second accuser against Ted Haggard. The unnamed young man, described as being in his twenties, said that some of his sexual encounters with Ted Haggard as non-consensual, and he revealed that the church paid him a large sum of money to keep quiet about it.

The KRDO teaser contained a brief telephone conversation between the young man and Haggard, in which Haggard admits to the relationship. New Life Church, which Ted Haggard founded and pastored  until his fall from grace, has refused to respond to questions from KRDO.

We noticed that the church’s statement on the latest accusations acknowledged that there were others who had a sexual relationship with Ted Haggard. KRDO has confirmed that observation.

Haggard is scheduled to appear on CNN’s Larry King Live on Thursday, and he already has taped a segment on “The Oprah Winfrey Show.”  “The Trials of Ted Haggard,” a documentary about Ted Haggard’s fall from grace, will premiere on HBO on Thursday.

Trevor

January 26th, 2009

Did you also notice that they jumped all-over Haggard when the target of his amorous advances was a promiscuous drug-using male prostitute (undoubtably representative of the “Homosexual Lifestyle”) but when it was one of their own sweet innocent cherubs they brushed it under the carpet?

BD

January 27th, 2009

http://www.krdo.com/Global/story.asp?S=9737380

Boyds statement

http://tinyurl.com/at9dah

How is an event two people acknowledge allegations? How is a relationship two people acknowledge an alleged relationship?

Piper

January 27th, 2009

Is it alleged, when both sides admit it happened?

And it is a big deal because one of the people in the relationship preached against gay people.

Thanks for the links by the way.

Bonnie

January 28th, 2009

I watched Oprah today and could not believe it when Mr Haggard said he believes that God accepts homosexuals.
THE HOLY BIBLE states that “for a man to be with a man, a woman to be with a woman, or either with an animal, is an ABOMINATION unto the Lord”.
God WILL forgive a homosexual, IF he admits and asks FORGIVENESS, and does not perform homosexual acts again, nor acts as if if he thinks admitting it on TV makes everything “ok”…..but marching for RIGHTS, and shoving it down our throats (no pun intended) to accept it is NOT okay!! I still haven’t come to grips as to whether it is sinful to BE gay, but it is sinful to act as if it is a right and that we should accept it, and it is wrong to teach our children that to practice it is acceptable and that they are wrongly prejudiced if they don’t!!!

Timothy Kincaid

January 29th, 2009

Bonnie,

You poor dear. Clearly you have never read the Bible and don’t know it well.

Because the words inside your quotation marks are not in the Bible; not in ANY translation. Oh how sad times have come when anti-gays are so very ignorant of Scripture that they can’t even quote it correctly.

Once even those who lived in the Ozarks and who could not read and write at least memorized passages from the Bible. I guess even that tradition is gone.

So it’s no wonder that you make wild and baseless claims like “it is sinful to act as if it is a right and that we should accept it”. Of course you don’t provide scipture for that claim because you are completely scripturally illiterate. Poor dear.

It’s sad, really. Pathetic even.

samantha spade

June 29th, 2009

Mr. Kincaid, you are the pathetic one to be sure! I won’t bother to give you the verses because it is quite clear that you have NO idea what God says about homosexuality! If you care to check out the book of Romans, First Timothy or Peter…it’s pretty clearly stated! Temptation is not a sin, weakness is not a sin. When temptation leads to action it then becomes sin….find it in the book of James! Being homosexual is not a sin…just like thinking about lying or stealing is not a sin. When we are tempted Jesus gives us a way out so that we can stand up under it…Corintians, big guy. If we choose to act on our temptations rather than turn to Jesus we indeed sin! Homosexual acts are sinnful thinking otherwise is sad, pathetic even!

r norton

July 27th, 2010

To T. Kincaid and S. Spade. Interesting. Now do either of you know Customs and manners of either the old or new testament? Translation, try the original language, while your at it remember Jerome stated he edited the N.T. I noticed everyone quotes this, that, other. The cool thing is scholars agree there are interpolations, not in the original text. Other Books of the Bible, they were never considered cannicle until royal edict around 310 ADE. How do I know this? I have a MA in early church history.

Approach the Bible as a scientist or a historian not as an armchair scholar who believes they might know something.

Homosexuality isn’t the issue, it’s our presumed knowledge of what you think the Bible says. If you knew the answers then there would be no editing and there would be only one belief, one christian church, not thousands.

I feel sorry for the lack of knowledge. religious philosophy does not nor can it ever take the place of historical knowledge or a rational scientific approach to scripture. They will either stand or fall on their own merits.

I request do not fence with me on this unless you are a historian.

Timothy Kincaid

July 27th, 2010

r norton,

You’re a bit late to the debate (look at the date on previous comments).

And considering your misinformation about the development of the New Testament canon (as well as your mangling of words familiar to scholars), I very much doubt your stated credentials.

But you are right that those who claim to know “what the Bible says” are only displaying their ignorance. Generally, they know what their religious tradition’s take is on the English translation of some cherry-picked selection of text (which may or may not reflect original language) which they see in terms of their own experiences without consideration (or knowledge) of the context in which it was written, the mindset of the audience, the concurrent cultural assumptions, or whether the author even intended it to be authoritative.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Federal Court Re-opens Marriage Equality Case Over Mississippi's "Religious Freedom" Law

Morelos On the Cusp Of Enacting Marriage Equality

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1969: Stonewall

Today In History, 1970: First Gay Pride Marches to Commemorate Stonewall

Today In History, 2000: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Boy Scouts' Gay Ban

Today In History, 2009: Fort Worth Police Raid the Rainbow Lounge

Today In History, 1936: John Inman

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.