Maggie Gallagher Gives False Information About El Coyote Owner

Timothy Kincaid

May 4th, 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTiTYRvaloQ

I don\’t object to National Organization for Marriage\’s Maggie Gallagher having any view she wishes to endorse. Nor do I oppose her opining wherever she gets the chance.

But Gallagher is not entitled to make claims that are contrary to the facts.

On Larry King Live (with Joy Behar sitting in as guest host), Gallagher said the following:

After Prop 8 … we had a waitress who gave $100 to support marriage and people were calling for her job, they wanted her to lose her job because she supported marriage as a man and a woman.

That, of course, was a reference to the response when gay Angelenos found out that Margie Christoffersen contributed to Proposition 8. Margie was not “a waitress”.

Margie is the “face” of El Coyote Mexican Restaurant, the family member selected to represent the family owned establishment to their customers. She is the daughter of the titular owner and the wife of the business manager for the company; they operate the restaurant together.

When gay patrons of the restaurant, most of whom had been customers for decades, found out that Margie had smiled at them one day and gave money to remove their rights the next, they demanded a meeting. In that meeting Margie was completely dismissive of their concerns.

Christoffersen has never been a waitress. Gallagher knows the facts of this story, she’s written on it before. This was nothing but a false attempt to elicit sympathy for a powerless woman who feared for her next paycheck, a woman who does not exist.

Johnson

May 4th, 2009

Thanks for bring that story up, I have wondered what has become of the El Coyote and Margie. Do you have an update for us?

homer

May 4th, 2009

Since when has Maggie Gallagher been interested in telling the truth?

RU486

May 4th, 2009

The best part of that show was seeing Stephen Baldwin with a pout on his fat face, complaining that he’s being persecuted(!) If only.

BPL

May 4th, 2009

Yeah, I caught that, too — “waitress” is quite a stretch, and Ms. Gallagher is probably fully aware that it’s a stretch, yet chose that word for its effect, regardless of its accuracy.

Ms. Gallagher seems to rely on:
(1) anecdotes
(2) that aren’t presented quite accurately; and are
(3) couched in an atmosphere of unnamed, diffuse, while very dark fears (“a storm is coming” and all that).

By contrast, we have truth and empiricism (e.g., the sky hasn’t fallen in Massachusetts) on our side. The only negative that has happened in places where SSM has become legal is basically that “some people don’t like the concept of it.”

As Wanda Sykes said, if you don’t like same-sex marriage, don’t get married to someone of the same sex.

Tommy

May 4th, 2009

This semester of college I took my senior seminar on the topic of propaganda. We have to write a massive final paper that I’m working on right now. I chose to write about NOM’s propaganda campaign of the last two months. Poor Maggie Gallagher, I already have so much material to work with that I can’t actually find room to discuss her blatant lies in that interview.

Buffy

May 4th, 2009

Maggie Gallagher is a professional propagandist. She wouldn’t know how to tell the truth if her life depended on it.

Regan DuCasse

May 5th, 2009

I have called back a few times, and tried to make contact, but Marj was pretty much not available.

Business fell off for a bit, and there hasn’t been a measurable way to blame a boycott so much as the overall downturn of less people eating out for any troubles the El Coyote might be undergoing.
The business hasn’t closed, nor have any lay offs been announced. I’m sure if any could be directly attributed to a gay walkout, we’d hear about it.

But Marj should have understood the lesson in betraying a customer base you depend on so much.

BTW, a man named anderson659 over at TownHall is on the march and has taken a strange obsession to me. This is fairly new and I’m not sure about what to do, but we’ll see.

It’s new to me to be accused of something and claims made as if I’ve committed a crime from a website blog thread.

He’s convinced I harassed a waitress and got her fired because of Prop. 8 simply because I mentioned attending the meeting and in the rally that passed by the restaurant. And he seems to think I should pay for it, or at least he won’t let it go.

What seems to be happening is if you’re honest about something it’s twisted into a Christian persecution mob. Indeed, he’s convinced of anti Christian persecution from more than a few people.

Anyway, this thing is virulent like the Ms. CA situation is.

I’m glad you caught what Gallagher said Tim. I was wondering if someone would report on it on our end.

We were there at El Coyote, but people like Gallagher and anderson659 don’t want to believe what we have to say about what really happened.

If anyone has any advice about what to do with this guy, it would be welcome.
As I said, this is a new one on me and I’m not sure how to respond.

Ben in Oakland

May 5th, 2009

Regan– give him the links to the lengthy discussions on el coyote at this very blog.

Then ignore him.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

FBI Reports Massive Surge In Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes in 2015

Baptist General Convention of Texas Warns Churches in Dallas and Austin Over LGBT Inclusion

Trump Selects Alt-Right Nationalist As "Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor"

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.